PDA

View Full Version : Chicago D or Baltimore D???


DenBronx
08-26-2007, 04:49 PM
I currently have CHI D but was wondering should I propose a trade for BAL D??? I was thinking Hestner would be huge for returns as well. Should I just stick with CHI?


Another note, Desmond Clark is still available. I have Winslow as a TE and Sheffler. Should I get rid of Sheffler and pick up Clark?

And I have Randel El as a 5th reciever.....should I go after BMarsh instead even though he is rated lower?

Lorcust
08-26-2007, 04:55 PM
I don't think Clark will have a significantly larger Fantasy impact than Scheffler this year. It's really a wash.

Try to get Baltimore D, its far more certain, IMO, and BJ Sams/Yamon figurs make an excellent return duo as well. Don't give up too much though.

Also, I'm pretty sure BMarsh will do better than Randle El, who is going to benefit far more from Walker's double coverages than Randle El will from Moss's double coverages.

Giveemlove
08-26-2007, 08:55 PM
If everything else on my 3 teams suck....I at least got good Def....

Ravens in one
Bears in another
and this was so friggen hard for me to do, but the best choice available....SD in the last. This one has been tarnished from draft day forward....my backup def is Oakland. :laugh:

BRONCOS_OWN_U16
08-26-2007, 09:33 PM
If everything else on my 3 teams suck....I at least got good Def....

Ravens in one
Bears in another
and this was so friggen hard for me to do, but the best choice available....SD in the last. This one has been tarnished from draft day forward....my backup def is Oakland. :laugh:

back up D?
why would you get a back up D?



i never end up with the best defense since i draft my defense last or 2nd last.

Doggcow
08-26-2007, 09:43 PM
Chicago purely because their schedule is rediculously easy every year.

DenBronx
08-26-2007, 11:57 PM
Chicago purely because their schedule is rediculously easy every year.



i looked at baltimores schedule and its pretty brutal compared to chitowns. plus chicago went to the superbowl last year and they are in the nfc.



If everything else on my 3 teams suck....I at least got good Def....

Ravens in one
Bears in another
and this was so friggen hard for me to do, but the best choice available....SD in the last. This one has been tarnished from draft day forward....my backup def is Oakland. .


actually the raiders will be a pretty good backup come bye week and if sd was all that was available then you faired well.

Giveemlove
08-27-2007, 07:29 AM
back up D?
why would you get a back up D?



i never end up with the best defense since i draft my defense last or 2nd last.

I do that so that on my bye week, I don't end up with some scrub team who will net me -5 points. That and if I have 2 good D's, I can interchange them based on who they will play.

Giveemlove
08-27-2007, 07:30 AM
i looked at baltimores schedule and its pretty brutal compared to chitowns. plus chicago went to the superbowl last year and they are in the nfc.






actually the raiders will be a pretty good backup come bye week and if sd was all that was available then you faired well.


That's why I picked them up. But it killed me as a Broncos fan!! :laugh:

laxstar263
08-27-2007, 10:14 AM
Baltimore isnt that good they have talent but they are old. Chicago is young with players like Lance Briggs, Tommy Harris, Nathen Vasher. With Chicago you also get Hester.