View Full Version : Torry Holt
bouloux29
09-28-2008, 03:57 AM
Im not usually one to propose players as im a believer in drafting for almost everything- but if he was available for a reasonable pick would he be worth it? We'd have an unbelievable wr line up- we'd be very difficult to stop, thoughts?
pipes
09-28-2008, 05:27 AM
Im not usually one to propose players as im a believer in drafting for almost everything- but if he was available for a reasonable pick would he be worth it? We'd have an unbelievable wr line up- we'd be very difficult to stop, thoughts?
Denver's offense is already explosive as any offense in the league....
And no one has been able to stop Denver's wide-outs this year.
Bringing in somebody like Holt would just be retarded. It would stunt Eddie Royal's growth.....not to mention his contract.
Denver is gonna need all their money here very very soon with guys like Marshall needing some new big coin.
I like Holt, but the WR position is a strength, not a weakness on this team as it sits right now.
The problem is defense....I'd much rather see Denver bring in a pass rushing DE, a penetrating DT, a playmaking S than ANY wide receiver at this point.
bouloux29
09-28-2008, 06:05 AM
fair enough, just got excited when they mentioned maybe releasing him
MindField
09-28-2008, 08:11 AM
Denver's offense is already explosive as any offense in the league....
And no one has been able to stop Denver's wide-outs this year.
Bringing in somebody like Holt would just be retarded. It would stunt Eddie Royal's growth.....not to mention his contract.
Denver is gonna need all their money here very very soon with guys like Marshall needing some new big coin.
I like Holt, but the WR position is a strength, not a weakness on this team as it sits right now.
The problem is defense....I'd much rather see Denver bring in a pass rushing DE, a penetrating DT, a playmaking S than ANY wide receiver at this point.
BS.
Are you writing the checks? If not, what do you care what his contract is?
Holt would actually be a great role model for Royal and Marshall, who has had his share of problems off the field less we forget.
Holt is a pro's pro and would be perfect here. I also believe his contract expires after the 2009 season, which makes him even a more attractive addition.
I would make this trade in a NY minute, but I have a feeling the Rams FO would veto Linehan's attampts to trade him.
Yes, the WR position is very good with the starters, but it is not deep. Stokely has trouble staying healthy, and beyond him, we have nothing with Darrell Jackson and Cliff Russell.
I say inquire, and if Holt costs a fourth or less, make the deal.
Momentum
09-28-2008, 01:38 PM
Can he play MLB? :coffee:
kratos_godofwar
09-28-2008, 06:18 PM
BS.
Are you writing the checks? If not, what do you care what his contract is?
Holt would actually be a great role model for Royal and Marshall, who has had his share of problems off the field less we forget.
Holt is a pro's pro and would be perfect here. I also believe his contract expires after the 2009 season, which makes him even a more attractive addition.
I would make this trade in a NY minute, but I have a feeling the Rams FO would veto Linehan's attampts to trade him.
Yes, the WR position is very good with the starters, but it is not deep. Stokely has trouble staying healthy, and beyond him, we have nothing with Darrell Jackson and Cliff Russell.
I say inquire, and if Holt costs a fourth or less, make the deal.
This speaks the truth. And let's not forget, Holt is one of the best route runners in the NFL. Something Marshall still needs to get better at and something Royal could learn a thing or 2 from.
jay who ?
09-28-2008, 06:22 PM
wr is not an immediate need....we need safeties,lb maybe a corner and a sackmaster i dont think holt fills any of those needs
maybe we could talk to jackson though:D
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.