PDA

View Full Version : Sage Rosenfels


bronco_head
08-18-2009, 11:03 AM
Maybe we should go after Sage Rosenfels since vikings p/u Farve.He is a lot better then Orton plus has a stronger arm. I dont think vikings are going to keep 3 QB. What do all of you think.

Atwnbroncfan
08-18-2009, 11:06 AM
There is a reason the vikes only got him for a 4th round pick. There is a reason why they want favre there. I will pass.

MorenoFan27
08-18-2009, 11:20 AM
I'lll take him....oh and Ortons worth more than a 4th rounder...hahahahahahahahahaha YOUR FUNNY.

Den615
08-18-2009, 11:54 AM
What about John David Booty? He might be flat out released (unless they trade Jackson, which could happen)

Booty seems like a McDaniel QB, but I doubt it happens. We wont carry 4 QB's so I dunno who gets cut, I guess you could try to hide Brandstater on the practice squad. Dunno if he'd clear waivers or not.

LastGoodScene
08-18-2009, 12:26 PM
It's not like Rosenfels is better than Orton by any significant amount, and Orton has already spent time learning the offense.

bronco_head
08-18-2009, 01:17 PM
Rosenfels to me is a better player he also has a stronger arm to get the ball down field in which Orton does not.These little 5-10yrds dinks is not going to cut it do you remember griese?THE Offense is built not only for short passes but big plays down the field and Orton cant get the ball past 20 yrds.That is going to kill us because look at are schedule this year.Tough D this year need to get ball down field.:orton:NOT THE ANSWER VERY WEEK ARM

jhildebrand
08-18-2009, 01:21 PM
There is a reason the vikes only got him for a 4th round pick. There is a reason why they want favre there. I will pass.

That reason is they were flirting with Favre all summer long, another reason is they have Booty as the future, and the final reason would be the Texans were set at QB.

The Broncos, on the other hand, have three reasons to look at a guy like Rosenfels:

#1: 1st INT
#2: 2nd INT
#3: 3rd INT

There is no reason the Broncos should not explore all possibilities for better talent at ANY POSITION.

LastGoodScene
08-18-2009, 01:26 PM
That reason is they were flirting with Favre all summer long, another reason is they have Booty as the future, and the final reason would be the Texans were set at QB.

The Broncos, on the other hand, have three reasons to look at a guy like Rosenfels:

#1: 1st INT
#2: 2nd INT
#3: 3rd INT

There is no reason the Broncos should not explore all possibilities for better talent at ANY POSITION.

That is what you call oversimplification

licence_to_kill
08-18-2009, 01:44 PM
I don't think Sage is going anywhere. Tavaris is the one they might try and shop around.

jhildebrand
08-18-2009, 03:19 PM
That is what you call oversimplification

I was simply replying to Atwnbronco fan in similar tone.

sage
08-18-2009, 07:06 PM
Maybe we should go after Sage Rosenfels since vikings p/u Farve.He is a lot better then Orton plus has a stronger arm. I dont think vikings are going to keep 3 QB. What do all of you think.

A Rosenfels+player/pick for Orton trade would improve our QB situation and possibly get a future defensive contributor.
:doh::orton::doh:

TRUEBRONCOFAN24
08-19-2009, 05:32 PM
Sage Rosenfels is more turnover prone than Kyle. I truly hope you guys don't think otherwise because of one PRESEASON game.

So the question is: Do we want a more turnover prone QB (proven fact, not just my opinion) or do we want to just stick with Kyle?

Ed Canfield
08-21-2009, 01:21 PM
How about trading Marshall for Sage and a draft pick.
This way we get a better qualified QB, and Marshal goes to a division that can't hurt us plus he gets to stick it to his buddy Jay !!!!!! :D

JakeNbake
08-21-2009, 01:22 PM
I'lll take him....oh and Ortons worth more than a 4th rounder...hahahahahahahahahaha YOUR FUNNY.

We actually gave up a 5th for Orton.

Hoserman117
08-24-2009, 06:12 PM
This is retarded. Why would they trade Rosenfels and a player/pick for Orton when they already have Favre? The only way to get this trade is if we gave up a pick/player.