OU or Auburn

[chickennob2]

who do you guys think should play USC?

[West]

auburn...auburn has played more tougher opponents and has beat them with flying colors...ou on the other hand has not played tough opponents and has almost got beat by them ...TEXAS 12-0 (texas almost lost to a 2-7 kansas team)..texas a&m who has a terrible defense...ou's d is the most overrated d in the nation...and auburn should be 2

[Booher]

OU does not deserve it what was that poll on espn likke 66 % said auburn should be #2.........and they should.......

[chickennob2]

looking at teams theyve beaten right now, maybe auburn should get the nod. But i guarantee you that OU can beat any team in college football. Close games build character. If Auburn got behind early (as they would in a BCS bowl), they would have no idea what to do. They would have to abandon Cadillac, and they would fail miserably. OU knows what to do though. It just sucks that this argument has to take place. Playoffs baby, playoffs. not a top 24 playoff system, but just top 8 or even top 4. with a top 4 system, just add another game a week after the top 2 bowls. Bowl system remains, you just add one a week later that determines the national championship. (winners of top 2 bowls play). I think an 8 team playoff system would work better, but a 4 team system is more realistic.

[West]

yea thats what everyone said when a 5'7 running back tore them up with 200+ rushing yards and 3 tds...and then a true freshman running back ran all over them last year in back to back games...until they prove they can beat lsu and usc you cant say that...

[MtRushmore]

Funny how you say that OU hasn't played anybody. Looking at the strength of schedule, you would have to say the same, and MORESO, about Auburn AND USC.
OU is like 12th in the nation, while USC and Auburn are 35-37.

You OU haters make me giggle.*giggle*

C'mon, westie, just admit you're jealous of OU's success since 2000. :rockon:

[RunByDesign]

Is that Narcisuss in your avatar?

[MtRushmore]

Is that Narcisuss in your avatar?


YUP! I'm devoting my posts. ;) ;)

[West]

Funny how you say that OU hasn't played anybody. Looking at the strength of schedule, you would have to say the same, and MORESO, about Auburn AND USC.
OU is like 12th in the nation, while USC and Auburn are 35-37.

You OU haters make me giggle.*giggle*

C'mon, westie, just admit you're jealous of OU's success since 2000. :rockon:
yea im jealous of 2 straight losses last year and a joke for playing in the national championship last year :cross:

[NJBRONCOSFAN]

Definitely Auburn.
They've played 3 teams that were in the top ten at the time of playing them.

Meanwhile, Oklahoma plays in what's basically the weakest major conference around, at least this year.
If Auburn stays undefeated, that means they will beat Alabama, and Georgia again in which case i think they need to be given the nod above Oklahoma.

[MtRushmore]

yea im jealous of 2 straight losses last year and a joke for playing in the national championship last year :cross:

I thought so, thanks.

So the first 12 games of the year were just an anomaly? :coffee:

[West]

your calling the teams taht you played the first 12 games were tough opponents? give me one good d secondary that white destroyed in those first 12 games

[West]

Definitely Auburn.
They've played 3 teams that were in the top ten at the time of playing them.

Meanwhile, Oklahoma plays in what's basically the weakest major conference around, at least this year.
If Auburn stays undefeated, that means they will beat Alabama, and Georgia again in which case i think they need to be given the nod above Oklahoma.
wrong tennessee is playing in the sec champ game...i think auburn will be upset in that game it will be a champ game consisting of usc and ou...

[MtRushmore]

Woo Hoo.

I didn't think I'd ever be happey to see OU #2, but then again, if NU can celebrate a field goal, anything's possible. :laugh:

[chickennob2]

ok, against k-state in the big12 championship game, sooners had scored a td early in the game and were driving when jason white hit his hand on the top of a wildcats player and broke multiple bones in his throwing hand. Yes, we did poorly after that. And yes, LSU healthy was slightly better than OU without their HEISMAN WINNING QUARTERBACK! and as to UT upsetting auburn, never gonna happen. Ainge is out, their mobile QB is out, theyre now on Rick Clausen, their 3rd string QB. Trust me, its not gonna happen

btw, VOLS SUCK!

[Broncos28]

The Auburn Tigers should be ranked as the number one team in the Country because they play in the SEC, the toughest Conference in the Country and they have been consistent in every game they have played. Plus they have played the hardest Schedule between the two.

The Oklahoma Sooners should be the number two rank team in the Country because they play a tougher Schedule than USC and they play probably in the second hardest Conference in the Country, the Big XII.

The USC Trojans should be number three because they play in the sorriest Conference, the Pac 10. Between the top six Conferences in the Nation, the Pac 10 is the worst. The only good team they have beaten was the California Golden Bears.

I want to see the Oklahoma Sooners and the Auburn Tigers go at in the Orange Bowl for the National Championship.

[West]

i disagree the big east is the worst

[NJBRONCOSFAN]

well yea, but really, their so bad, i don't eve consider them one of the major conferences anymore!

[West]

yes but next year there getting a solid school in louisville

[NJBRONCOSFAN]

but that's it...
anyways, their basketball conference is gonna be gangster.

[West]

yea fo sho...their getting louisville to add to pitt nd (i think) and some more

[Broncos28]

Okay let me rephrase my statement the Big East is the worst Conference now between the six major Conferences but the Pac 10 is right next to the Big East. In the last 15 years you guys can agree the Pac 10 has always sucked.

Anyway, I still want to see Auburn and Oklahoma go at it because I hate the USC Trojans and every single California team Pro or College.

[NJBRONCOSFAN]

Yea, they already have pitt, nd, uconn, st. johns, syracuse, providence, villanova, boston college, georgetown, and seton hall.
and they are gonna add Louisville, Marquette, Cincinatti, and Depaul
it's gonna be a nasty conference.

[Broncos28]

Yea, they already have pitt, nd, uconn, st. johns, syracuse, providence, villanova, boston college, georgetown, and seton hall.
and they are gonna add Louisville, Marquette, Cincinatti, and Depaul
it's gonna be a nasty conference.For Basketball, Yes! Go Johnny's!

[twotone]

Okalahoma deserves to be in the nat'l championship game.

[chickennob2]

i cant believe the big east raided C-USA and dfidnt take Memphis! We now have an automatic NCAA tourbney bid essentially and will go undefeated for many seasons in football. Why would anyone take depaul over memphis? Wawtch it guys, this bball season, the memphis tigers in the elite eight, im callin it right now

[rcsodak]

I posted this on the BCS thread also.
But just in case ya'll missed it. :cheers:
Just thought those of you that don't think OU deserves the #2 spot, that this might interest you.


A Comparison of the BCS Top Three - TALE OF THE TAPE


Oklahoma USC Auburn
Overall Record for 2004 Season

10-0 10-0 10-0
Overall Conference Record for 2004 Season
7-0 Big 12 7-0 Pac 10 7-0 SEC
Opponents' Combined Records
57-43 (.518) 48-50 (.490) 45-49 (.479)* (includes I-AA Citadel)
Schedule Strength
(BCS Formula)
14 36 21
Games vs. Ranked Opponents
^ 3 2 3
^ All of these rankings are from the time the game was played. If moving to the current poll, Oklahoma goes up to four with the addition of Bowling Green and USC goes up to three with the addition of Virginia Tech.


Road/Neutral Games vs. Ranked Opponents
3 0 1
Opponents with Winning Records
5 3 3
Combined Record of Conference Opponents
41-29 (.585) 32-37 (.463) 34-36 (.485)
Conference Opponents Played With Losing Record
2 4 4
Conference Schools Ranked Among Top 25
4 3 4
Conference Schools Ranked Among Top 5
2 2 1

The BCS Computers
Oklahoma USC Auburn
Anderson & Hester No. 1 No. 2 No. 3
Billingsley No. 1 No. 2 No. 3
Colley Matrix No. 1 No. 2 No. 3
Wolfe No. 1 No. 2 No. 3
Massey No. 2 No. 1 No. 3
Sagarin No. 2 No. 1 No. 6

Road Wins
Opponent Opponent Rank Opponent Home Record
Oklahoma vs. Texas (12-0) 5/5 Neutral Site
Kansas State (31-21) NR 3-3
Okla. State (38-35) 20/20 3-2
Texas A&M (42-35) 22/22 4-1

USC
Virginia Tech (24-13) NR Nuetral Site
BYU (42-10) NR 3-3
Stanford (31-28) NR 3-3
Wash. State (38-0) NR 1-3
Oregon State (28-20) NR 2-2

Auburn
Miss. State (43-14) NR 3-3
Tennessee (34-10) 10/8 4-2
Ole Miss (35-14) NR 2-3


Big 12 Top 5 Pac 10 Top 5 SEC Top 5
Oklahoma (10-0) USC (10-0) Auburn (10-0)
Texas (9-1) California (8-1) Georgia (8-2)
Texas A&M (7-3) Arizona State (8-2) LSU (7-2)
Oklahoma State (7-3) UCLA (6-4) Tennessee (7-2)
Texas Tech (6-4) Two at 5-5 Three at (6-4)


Big 12 Bottom 5 Pac 10 Bottom 5 SEC Bottom 5
Nebraska (5-5) Two at (5-5) Arkansas (4-5)
Missouri (4-5) Stanford (4-6) Miss. St. (3-6)
Kansas State (4-6) Washing St. (4-6) Ole Miss (3-6)
Kansas (3-7) Arizona (2-8) Kentucky (2-8)
Baylor (3-7) Vanderbilt (2-8)

So all the nuts and bolts point to NOT whether OU deserves to be #2, but whether they shouldn't be #1.
__

[Booher]

Yea, they already have pitt, nd, uconn, st. johns, syracuse, providence, villanova, boston college, georgetown, and seton hall.
and they are gonna add Louisville, Marquette, Cincinatti, and Depaul
it's gonna be a nasty conference.


Still second best though :rockon:

[rcsodak]

Still second best though :rockon:
HEY! Get that bball crap off of this thread. Go make your own!!!!!!


:cheers: