9 - 0!

[RaiderhaterinKC]

How sweet it is!

Cleveland had only given up 8 touchdowns all year, and the Chiefs put up 5 on them today.

It was a complete victory today, and if Gary Stills makes that block, Dante can find paydirt again.

[NYCHIEFSFAN]

And the team we're supposed to be so scared of (Indy) only managed 9 points and 0 TD's vs the Browns. No one can stop us!

[jocool]

So what, theres no way a Trent Green lead team is going all the way, ****ing forget it! Be happy now but-realize Steve Mcnair and the TITANS will beat you in the AFC championship! Remember Jocool said it!

[NYCHIEFSFAN]

Originally posted by jocool
So what, theres no way a Trent Green lead team is going all the way, ****ing forget it! Be happy now but-realize Steve Mcnair and the TITANS will beat you in the AFC championship! Remember Jocool said it!

Are you talking about the same Titans who lost to the Colts (who lost to the Jags)????

Maybe you meant the Patriots? No, I doubt it. They lost to Buffalo (who we THRASHED).

Hmmmmmm.

Let's hypothetically match the Titans up with the Chiefs.

QB- McNair over Green - barely
RB - Holmes easily over George
O-Line - Chiefs
TE - Gonzo
WR's - Titans
Special Teams - KC

Total Defense TN (327) over KC (347)
Sacks: KC 21 over TN 19
INT's: KC 18 TN 7
Giveaway/takeaway: KC 18 TN 7
Points per game: KC 16.2 TN 20.9

Obviously, the game will be in KC so,

Homefield Advantage: KC

How in the world do you see the Titans winning this game??? Put down the crackpipe and think about it.

[Return of Lava]

Why dont all yall SHUT UP! You may laugh at Denver but you know in your heart a healthy Denver team can squash you without you infamous homefield advantage which led to a 1 pt. win. your 12th man will be injured come December buddy!

And titans wont even make it to the superbowl steve can carry them that long buster.

remember Lava said it!

[ozzy_osbourne]

Originally posted by horseface
Lava...that was a long, long time ago...the Chiefs have looked infinitely better since that game, and the Broncos haven't even come close to playing good football since.
any team can lose on any given Sunday, don't start getting too ****y, that is a set up for a let down...

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
Lava...that was a long, long time ago...the Chiefs have looked infinitely better since that game, and the Broncos haven't even come close to playing good football since. No, the chiefs were playing good back then also they had the exact same score against the steelers before our game so that means they ran into a "real" team, but rallied behind their home crowd to get the win. But wont be able to rally in Mile High!

[UNC-KC]

two quick points:

1) just because you lost by 1 at KC doesn't mean you won't lose at home by 30. like they said, you gotta play THAT GAME, past results are nullified.

2) 9-0 feels mighty good, but hopefully the best is yet to come!

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by UNC-KC
two quick points:

1) just because you lost by 1 at KC doesn't mean you won't lose at home by 30. like they said, you gotta play THAT GAME, past results are nullified.

2) 9-0 feels mighty good, but hopefully the best is yet to come! Let me counter that with this

Just because you squaked out a 1 point win, even though we dominated you on both sides of the ball and we even did it at arrowhead, by an infamous return by Dante Hall, that doesnt mean it will get easier for you when you come to Mile HIgh.

[RaiderhaterinKC]

Hey props to the '98 Broncos, but guess what? This ain't '98, boys. This is 2003 and that means it's the Chiefs all the way. It's their year. We got better weapons and alot less injuries than anyone in our division. The division race is over.

Now it's all about home field advantage, and bring on one and all to Terrorhead. It's the last stop before Priest and the boys depart for Houston.

Will somebody please tell the '72 Dolphins to put away the champaign? The ice is melting...

It could be worse: you could be a Raiduhs' fan...

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by RaiderhaterinKC
Hey props to the '98 Broncos, but guess what? This ain't '98, boys. This is 2003 and that means it's the Chiefs all the way. It's their year. We got better weapons and alot less injuries than anyone in our division. The division race is over.
with the exception that you have better weapons, i will let you have the rest of that paragraph.

[RandomKCFan]

My mom can beat up your dad.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
do you honestly feel that the Chiefs played their best football in that game?
Do you watch them play? They looked the worst all season that game...granted, Denver's D looked great, but the Chiefs were simply not clicking. They are firing on all cylinders right now, and are playing completely different football. If you can't see that...you're blind Lava. You seem to be an intelligent fan, but to say that the first game will have any affect on the second is ludicrous. Denver has a lot of work to do before they even stand a chance against THIS Chiefs team. Running on all cylinders my a$$ you played the browns! the team that has no D! I will let you say that if you put up that on the broncos at mile high ok.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
much better weapons. please

[RandomKCFan]

You are a ****ing retard. Browns have no D? They happened to have the 7th best D in the league, and number 3 passing D. They had the number 1 Redzone defense, and had only given up 8 TDs all year long. They have no defense though.

[RandomKCFan]

Lava, i have removed your speaking priveleges.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by RandomKCFan
You are a ****ing retard. Browns have no D? They happened to have the 7th best D in the league, and number 3 passing D. They had the number 1 Redzone defense, and had only given up 8 TDs all year long. They have no defense though. Since you wanna metion all that why dont you mention the fact that they allowed the most running yards in HISTORY since you are so smart why u leave that out?

[RandomKCFan]

Because we didn't beat them on the ground, we beat them in the air.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by RandomKCFan
Lava, i have removed your speaking priveleges. Shup up you know how dont u sound "I have removed your speaking priveleges"..........geek

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by RandomKCFan
Because we didn't beat them on the ground, we beat them in the air. Which is the reason i say they have no D you stupid or something you ran right into that one!

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
The Browns Defense was actually ranked 7th in the NFL before today son. Do your research before you make accusations about who we play. The Chiefs scored 5 TD's against a defense that had only given up 8 total TD's coming in...that is hitting on all cylinders young man. Hey whatever we will see what you can do against a defense ranked better than 7 ok BUSTER? Your defense cant stop anybody either!

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
they've stopped 9 straight teams kiddo. You see the object of this game is to score more points than your opponent. The Chiefs D has done enough to make that 9-0 record possible. And as for the Broncos D...it's slowly dropping...like your players. Don't count on the Denver game to be a shootout. The Bronco's will have to put up 30 to keep up with the Chiefs. And if you really believe that you have no business being a fan of anything. You think the Chiefs can really put up 40 against us? Priest will have no where to run cause yes we do have our starting DT back and he dont play that. I wouldnt be suprised if we blow u out at mile high.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by Return of Lava
And if you really believe that you have no business being a fan of anything. You think the Chiefs can really put up 40 against us? Priest will have no where to run cause yes we do have our starting DT back and he dont play that. I wouldnt be suprised if we blow u out at mile high. If the browns can put up 20+ on you, im sure we can put up 30+

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
Priest will get his...he always does. And now that Trent is on (119.9 QB rating today) he'll go ahead and throw for 400yds against your secondary. It's falling apart at the seams...the Chiefs will simply finish ripping it for you. OK guy, im sure you want to believe he will really do that. Just know who we have and as long as we are healthy, you will always take a back seat to us!

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
a backseat? to the Broncos? this year?

You were healthy when we played last Like I said, and we did dominate we had 460 yards you had 270, we had 22 first, you had 13, we had 1 turnover, you had 2 . that is dominating, those are FACTS, but like i said you rallied behind arrowhead and hall's clip-full return and won that game. you cant get that lucky again

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
If you don't think Priest will get his...you haven't been watching football for the last 3 years. He is the best back in the NFL....him and Marshall are the most complete backs. You'll be lucky to keep it within 10 in Denver. It may not matter when San Diego ruins your playoff hopes next week. If you have been watching the last 2, Portis has been stealing the show. He took it in the KC game with his 65 yard run and 72 yard catch and will continue. i dont expect u to admit that he IS the most complete back!

[RaiderhaterinKC]

Portis is a terrific back, but Denver has too many injuries this year. I'm not sold on Plummer yet. Are you? I think it's too early to tell about Jake the Snake, and Danny K's not going to make you start saying John Elway who.

It just isn't Denver's year this year because of all of your injuries.

The Chiefs' three biggest tests will be Cinci, Denver and Minn.

It could be worse: you could be a Raiders fan.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by RaiderhaterinKC
I'm not sold on Plummer yet. Are you? take a quick peek in the general discussion

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
Portis hasn't stolen anything...He had the better game once this year...but last I looked, Priest led the league in TD'a and yards from scrimmage. Priest is the complete package. Portis has a long way to go if you ever want to compare the 2. ask john madden

[Return of Lava]

argument is weak?? Fine genius, you want facts, here yo go. Portis has a better yard per carry than holmes and thats what matters most when talking about the best cause anybody can run all day and lead the league in yards from scrimmage. then since portis was injured, hw missed chance to get a lot of yards against lions and chargers. second, to be a complete back, you have to have the FULL package. that means more that run and catch, it also includes blocking, priest would know nothing since he is always trying to get downfield for a catch bu take one look at Portis blocks and tell me who is the best back. how's that for a weak argument!

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
are you saying that weak little Portis is a better blocker than Priest Holmes. You are an idiot young man. speaking of weak, wheres YOUR proof on that BUSTER

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
You may be the only person in the world that believes Portis is a "complete" back. He's quick and is a great back, but Priest is THE "complete" back...hence the #1 in yards from scrimmage and TD totals. Priest put up the numbers he did last year with an injury as well, so don't play that card with Portis...you're preaching to the choir. He runs...catches (possibly the best at screen passes in the NFL)...and SCORES TD's. As for blocking...he does it when he needs to, but when you have the best O-line in football giving Trent all day to throw...I'd rather have him running routes. With Denver, Portis has to block...and gets run over. With KC, Priest is able to play his game. Possibly if Portis was in a better system and better offense he could be compared to Priest, but as long as he's a Bronco...Priest will be better. Whatever, see thats the reason why i never come to the smack board. People just dont know how to be reasonable. you are 9-0 so you are gonna throw out a bunch of statements that exaggerate your success and i wont say anything anymore until you beat us at mile high, if you do u will get props but until then , we might as well be tied both defending home field.

[ChiefsMang]

Originally posted by Return of Lava
Hey whatever we will see what you can do against a defense ranked better than 7 ok BUSTER?

Ohhhh, like Buffalo and Baltimore? Someone like that?

[elwaymvp]

Originally posted by NYCHIEFSFAN
Are you talking about the same Titans who lost to the Colts (who lost to the Jags)????

Titans looked pretty good Sunday...

[CHIEFS 9&0]

hey donkeys, it dont matter how much you controled the game .the part you didnt control was the final score

[Elway]

Originally posted by elwaymvp
Titans looked pretty good Sunday...

NFL Live tonight talked about them, calling them the best team in the AFC even though KC is 9-0.

That Trey Wingo, Mike Golic & Brian Cox.... what a bunch of crazy guys.

[breTTus]

Originally posted by RaiderhaterinKC
We got better weapons and alot less injuries than anyone in our division. The division race is over.

Now it's all about home field advantage, and bring on one and all to Terrorhead.

Will somebody please tell the '72 Dolphins to put away the champaign? The ice is melting...



seems it hasn't been much of a race, tho... yes, you may very well have the div.... and you may very well get the bye and homefield throughout... but 9-0 (though statistically sound) doesn't mean you can open your own champagne... go ahead, tho, if you reallyreally wanna... still have some pretty good teams to go thru... and even if the all of the numbers are in your favor, do you not think that KC will ever cool down?... or that one cylinder can't possibly start misfiring?... 9-0?... yes, but that still needs to be almost doubled for perfect in-season, and better than doubled for perfect season... in contrast to the last team that went 9-0, KC looks just as good in their chances... but I would feel they're a bit slimmer in the perfect season chances than DEN was in their run at it... and both may even pale in comparison to '72 MIA... good luck... turd... :D...

[RednGold4Life]

I do not think anyone on the Team or the coaches are thinking about popping any corks anytime soon. All I hear from the Coaches on the radio or in the paper is how much respect the Coaching staff has for every team we have played.

Also hear the team members on radio repeatedly state "We try and win 1 game at a time" whenever one of the radio people ask about houston.

You can cry and whine all you want about bad luck- and you guys surely have had some this year, and we have been lucky ourselves to be sitting at 9-0. We could have lost a couple of games sure, but the whole team is playing well.

Yes there are some disrespectful fans mouthing off, excited to be undefeated- I have been one. So what. If your team was 9-0 I am sure you would be saying Plummer and Shanarat walked on water.

I do hope you guys can make the playoffs and come to arrowhead. I honestly believe if all are starters are healthy at that time, you go home losers.

Also - Get Lava some help. Not sure if he has missed his meds or what, but am concerned about his sanity.

[breTTus]

Originally posted by RednGold4Life

You can cry and whine all you want about bad luck- and you guys surely have had some this year, and we have been lucky ourselves to be sitting at 9-0. We could have lost a couple of games sure, but the whole team is playing well.

Yes there are some disrespectful fans mouthing off, excited to be undefeated- I have been one. So what. If your team was 9-0 I am sure you would be saying Plummer and Shanarat walked on water.

Also - Get Lava some help. Not sure if he has missed his meds or what, but am concerned about his sanity.

I took 'em... ;)... anywho, at one time I was, and still am, and still do... *looks around*... how was that?... am I sane?... hello?... oh, yes... you're still a turd... do you think that yours do the fluid-top waltz?... yet?... still?... whatever... hey, nurse!... get these damn voices outa here!...

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by RednGold4Life
I do not think anyone on the Team or the coaches are thinking about popping any corks anytime soon. All I hear from the Coaches on the radio or in the paper is how much respect the Coaching staff has for every team we have played.

Also hear the team members on radio repeatedly state "We try and win 1 game at a time" whenever one of the radio people ask about houston.

You can cry and whine all you want about bad luck- and you guys surely have had some this year, and we have been lucky ourselves to be sitting at 9-0. We could have lost a couple of games sure, but the whole team is playing well.

Yes there are some disrespectful fans mouthing off, excited to be undefeated- I have been one. So what. If your team was 9-0 I am sure you would be saying Plummer and Shanarat walked on water.

I do hope you guys can make the playoffs and come to arrowhead. I honestly believe if all are starters are healthy at that time, you go home losers.

Also - Get Lava some help. Not sure if he has missed his meds or what, but am concerned about his sanity. what you talkin bout behind my back?

[elwaymvp]

Originally posted by Return of Lava
what you talkin bout behind my back?

THE FOOZBALL!! :)

[breTTus]

Originally posted by elwaymvp
THE FOOZBALL!! :)

and stuff... where did you hide the meds this time?... I'm jones'n... c'mon, lava, hook a brother up... :D...

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
The numbers don't lie my friend. do you really believe this?

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
In this argument...referring to Priest Holmes being the most complete back in the NFL the last 2 years...I absolutely believe it. As do most of the analysts around the game. He is the "picture-perfect" complete back. He does it all. So yes...I do believe that Priests #'s don't lie...they do all the talking for him as the best back in the NFL. So if you believe it for priest, what does it mean that you dont believe it for the broncos dominating the chiefs in that game? If the numbers dont lie you can easily admit that the broncos are a better team. You try and say that they just had a bad game but it seems like a contradiction.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
a players stats over an entire season don't lie...but they can play a bad game, that won't establish who they are over that season. As for the Chiefs/Broncos game...the Broncos played the better game that day, but over the course of the season, the Chiefs have proven to be the better team. In this analogy, the Chiefs played their worst football of the year that day, and the Broncos played very well. On that day, the Broncos played better football, but that does not mean they are the better team.

Look at it like this: Priest Holmes has say 85 yards on a given Sunday...not playing very well...and the same Sunday, T.J. Duckett has 120 yards and plays one of his better games. By your logic, now Duckett is the better running back...but you and I both know that's not the case.

The #'s don't lie is not a "blanket" statement that covers everything in the universe...must I continue??? well that just means your statement wasnt as strong as it once was. numbers do lie. they lied when they gave you the win that game cause even you say we played the better game that day. numbers lie a lot if you ask me. any team that has a bad game, just got outplayed that day,there is no such thing as just a bad game but a good opponent, that day. even that, doesnt mean you will win (ex. den-kc game)

[SeaOfBlack0304]

lol how could Priest number's be a lie? How can you lie about how many yards or touchdown's he's had? Seems like a pretty exact thing to me...

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
He's saying that his abilities are not reflected by his numbers, I guess. Supposedly Priest is not as good as his numbers make him out to be. im just sayin if you gonna apply it to one, then apply it to all and dont try to make excuses just cause youre a chiefs fan, i said priest was a good back, but you insist on saying the chiefs are still the better team even though we came to ARROWHEAD and dominated the game. its not about numbers as much as it is what you see out there.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
Once again...the better team is not decided in one game. Over the course of the season...the Chiefs have been the better team...no question.

take baseball for example...the world series is won in a best-of-seven-series. With your mindset...the better team should play better in every single game and win 4-0 because they are the better team. One game does not decide that. Denver played the better game on that particular day, but that does not make them the better team this season. They just played the better game that day. No one, outside of Denver, around the NFL will tell you that the Broncos are the "better" team...it's just not the case. The numbers...over the course of the season...don't lie. And the #'s "OVER THE COURSE OF THE SEASON" say KC is the best team in football...comprende? so you are saying you are the better team cause you have a better record? thats bull cause you didnt even win that game between us cause all the ref's help but we been injured for every other game after that. in baseball, the team with the best record over the season DID NOT win the championship so there goes that argument. this is football and in football, you get one chance to prove yourself if you get beat, you get beat, but even though stats dont tell who won the game, it tells who the better team was. If you wait until the dec. game for us to prove to you again that we are the better team (when healthy), then you do that.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
you are not listening...it's not the record that proves it (although it helps)...it's how they've been playing football all year (with an exception of that one game in reference). They are the better team. Playing "good" football is about dealing with injuries and overcoming the challenges you face. Most teams face some adversity over the course of the season. According to your argument...even if the Chiefs go on to win the Super Bowl, if Denver wins the Dec. 7th rematch, Denver is the better team...and that is ridiculous. The entire season determines who is better...and as of RIGHT NOW...at this point in the SEASON...the Chiefs are the better team. Are you really going to continue to argue that?
I'm sure that you think "historically" the Broncos are better than the Chiefs, right? They have won more Super Bowls and had better success in the post season...I too would say Denver is the better "historical" team. BUT, according to your logic...the Chiefs are the better team historically due to the head-to-head matchup between the teams belonging to the Chiefs...
POINT BEING: Head-to-head matchups DO NOT mean everything. so how do you feel you won the game? do you think it was fair the kicker got to kick twice for 3 more points? u think it was fair to get clipped twice? i just want to know what you think about that.

[Return of Lava]

Originally posted by horseface
do I think he should have kicked twice...YES. The ref was out of position and it never should have been a live ball. That is the rule. It was the correct call. If he would have made it...you would have been happy that the CORRECT call was made and he had to kick it again. END OF STORY on the kick.

do I think the refs missed "a" clip...probably so. We don't know what exactly the refs saw...penalties are missed on every play in the NFL...you are just upset that they missed this one. However, if Denver truly "dominated in every facet of this game" it shouldn't have come down to one missed call. Denver played better that day...but often times the team that plays better loses. They're were other factors in the loss. Denver did have the ball 1st and goal on the 3 yard line and couldn't put it in the end zone. Denver did get the ball back after Hall's return with enough time to get into field goal range. The Chiefs played great D when they absolutely needed to and pulled out the win. You need to put some of the blame on your boy Plummer and the Broncos for not putting the game away when they had the chance.
That is what I think about that. I see what you are saying but the fact that we couldnt punch it in on 1st and 3 was our fault, not the refs to blame for that. its just a coincidence that probably the only kick morten ever missed from that distance was a mulligan. its also a coincedence that the best play moss ever made in his highlight filled career came against us, also the only FG return and longest play in history came against us, also the best return Dante Hall will ever make came against us, also the.....well im off topic, but i dont care anymore.......ITS JUST NOT FAIR DAMNIT!

[brnc fan 14]

beating the browns is NOT THAT BIG of a deal...

and you still have denver to play

[breTTus]

Originally posted by horseface
it wasn't beating them...it was how we beat them. They had given up 8 total TD's all year long...and the Chiefs put up 5 against them in one game. Their D was ranked 7th in the NFL before the game...it most definitely wasn't after.
And I think it's more like...Denver still has to play the Chiefs.

Coming from the fan of a team that hasn't defeated a good team yet...I don't think you need to tell us about who we beat. We've beat everyone we've played...you've beat strictly subpar teams....thanks for the refresher course though.

and all this coming from a fan of a team that wins by an edge for a living... I mean, except for the browniescouts, KC hasn't really 'dominated' a game from gun to whistle have they?... seems that they're always getting that 'one' play or series that puts it away... I know that a W is a W, but it is only midseason and here y'all are talking like you have the next 'dynasty' all dressed up in that nasty red/gold combo... and DEN did play KC well in the last meeting... at least well enogh that you needed 3.75 quartes to put it away... *rolls eyes*... some domination THAT is... :cheeky:... as if CLE isn't a fine example of a subpar team to beat upon...

[UNC-KC]

San Diego W 27-14
Pittsburgh W 41-20
@ Houston W 42-14
Buffalo W 38-5

are those not "dominating" as well?

[breTTus]

Originally posted by UNC-KC
San Diego W 27-14
Pittsburgh W 41-20
@ Houston W 42-14
Buffalo W 38-5

are those not "dominating" as well?

*assumes patronizing facial expression*... yeah, ain't nuthin' like beating those super forces there... *rolls eyes*... I'm sure Houston really put it to ya... and SD?... man, had to just be lucky, I guess... congrats, this KC team has GOT to be the 'best-in-all-time' for those wins... *golf clap*... ttttttttttthhhhhhhhhhhhbbbbbbbbbttttt... (looks like - :cheeky:)...

[breTTus]

Originally posted by horseface
The fact of the matter remains. The chiefs have beat everyone they've played thus far...which is much more than the Broncos can say. The chiefs have beat good teams and killed some questionable teams...but Denver is yet to beat a team that could be even considered "GOOD". As for beating "super forces"....didn't Denver almost lose to one of those forces at home...Does Pittsburgh ring a bell????? What about almost losing to the Lions at home???? You haven't beat anyone good, and you have barely beat the teams you should have killed in your own backyard. Win a tough game...then talk smack about the Chiefs.

first of all... :cheeky:... that's what I meant last post... now... I'll agree with the above statement, but you list SD as one of your 'great' wins... so when we win this weekend we'll be closer to playing at your 'vaunted level', yes?... good luck with CIN... :p... and when we DO win in Dec., I'm almost certain that you'll have something or another 'wrong' then... *starts to walk away, then stops and turns back*... and I don't give a fat chef's a** whether you win 'em all, or we don't win another... I'll talk da smack aaallllll I wanna... :goofy:... turd...