PDA

View Full Version : Conflict of Interest

sdbroncofan1
10-25-2005, 11:23 PM
Westbrook or Bell
(Mind says) (Gut Says)




Intellege Reply's Wanted
Bucc_Nasty
10-26-2005, 09:17 AM
well remind your gut that the eagles held LT to under 40 yrds TOTAL..bell is not going to do a thing...
AlWilsonizKING
10-26-2005, 09:28 AM
well remind your gut that the eagles held LT to under 40 yrds TOTAL..bell is not going to do a thing...


A lotta times what you do one week is not what you do the next week.....



PEACE!!!
xX-Bronco-Xx
10-26-2005, 02:43 PM
Sadly to say u should start Westbrook cuz if he doesnt do well in running he will do well catching.
BroncoBailey024
10-26-2005, 02:50 PM
I say Bell over Westbrook.

We wern't supposed to run on the Jags, but we did.

Same thing with redskins but we ran over them too.

The eagles threw the ball 54 times last game, so obviously they don't utilize the run.

Westbrook will have couple catches but I think bell would do better. :D

Just my 2 cents
NJBRONCOSFAN
10-26-2005, 03:47 PM
Gotta go with Westbrook..he's just the better back, and like it was said, if he doesn't get the rushing yards, he'll most certainly get the receiving ones.
DenverFanInGB
10-26-2005, 06:51 PM
Westbrook..
sdbroncofan1
10-26-2005, 10:10 PM
i put tater at rb

westbrook at rb/wr

good or bad?
NJBRONCOSFAN
10-27-2005, 05:13 AM
i put tater at rb

westbrook at rb/wr

good or bad?
Who did you take out of the lineup in order to start tatum? If you had two spots open to begin with, then it doesn't matter.
Tatortot
10-29-2005, 10:17 AM
If you get points for receptions, you should definitely start westbrook. He had what, like 10 receptions last week? Even if he doesnt get many yds, he would pile up receptions. If you dont get pts for receptions, play bell possibly if sheppard doesnt start because they wont be able to stack the line as much and if he does play, go with westbrook.