View Full Version : Is Ahman Green A Possibility in Denver...
TDMiller
12-25-2006, 09:29 PM
How do Bronco Fans feel about bringing in another Green Bay Packer player.
He missed two games in October with a hamstring problem that likely was related to his quadriceps tendon injury.
Green is playing on a one-year contract, and the Packers face a tough decision about his future.
With the numbers he has put up this season, Green and his agent almost certainly will be seeking one more big-money contract. But given Green's age — he'll be 30 next season — the Packers might be reluctant to invest in him long-term.
It's too soon to know whether the Packers' offensive coaches will recommend that GM Ted Thompson try to bring him back next season, but they seem pleased with his production and the way he's bounced back from his injury.
"I think Green's getting stronger," offensive coordinator Jeff Jagodzinski said. "He's close to being a 1,000-yard rusher, and I thought before the season he'd be a 1,000-yard rusher. That's a testament to him the way he came back and battled back, so I don't think he's trailed off."
http://www.ahman30.com/commerce/inthenews/inthenews.asp?reqdate=12/17/2006&id_passed=282
rcsodak
12-25-2006, 09:33 PM
How do Bronco Fans feel about bringing in another Green Bay Packer player.
http://www.ahman30.com/commerce/inthenews/inthenews.asp?reqdate=12/17/2006&id_passed=282
Why ask the fans?
m_shannahan@broncos.org
:rolleyes:
TDMiller
12-25-2006, 09:38 PM
Why ask the fans?
m_shannahan@broncos.org
:rolleyes:
That's what this forum is for, the fans.
Who else would I ask?
sneakers
12-25-2006, 09:40 PM
NOOOOOOOOO!
Washed up!
Bring back Ron Dayne!!
Merry Christmas!
flbroncofan
12-25-2006, 09:40 PM
Man he may be getting stronger in rehab but 30 is pretty old for a rb. (kind of funny to type because i'm gonna be 31 on the 29th!) Don't think we want to hitch our wagon to someone with that many miles. Need to look to the draft for the rb position imo.
Nick7
12-25-2006, 09:41 PM
I'd like it, just because I'm a Husker fan, but he's too old and hurt at this point,
rAiDeRs SuCk
12-25-2006, 09:46 PM
NOOOOOOOOO!
Washed up!
Bring back Ron Dayne!!
Merry Christmas!
hoping thats sarcasm
cause Ron Dayne was washed up when he got IN the league. :D
sneakers
12-25-2006, 09:52 PM
hoping thats sarcasm
cause Ron Dayne was washed up when he got IN the league. :D
No sarcasm, Did you see what he did the other day? Merry Christmas (what is left of it).
silkamilkamonic
12-25-2006, 09:59 PM
Just say no to Ahman Green!!
He isn't a completely terrible option, but there are far better ones out there, including the ones we already have.
rcsodak
12-25-2006, 10:09 PM
That's what this forum is for, the fans.
Who else would I ask?
I answered that question already.... :cheers:
...sorry, but I just get tired of all of the "should we get" threads.....
...especially when the current season isn't even over.
It'd be nice if these could wait until the season is over, free agents are listed, needs can be addressed, etc.....
It's like a store getting Christmas stock in July.......
...there needs to be some sort of separation, imo..... ;)
OrangePeel
12-25-2006, 10:12 PM
if the medical staff was convinced he was healed.
yes I would take a flyer on him. This is the same guy who ran for over 1,800 yards a couple years back. 30 really isn't that old. He should have 2 or 3 more years in him if he is healthy.
Dream
12-25-2006, 10:15 PM
If it's for cheap, why not? He's also developed as a blocker and he's a good receiver out of the backfield.
TDMiller
12-25-2006, 10:28 PM
I answered that question already.... :cheers:
...sorry, but I just get tired of all of the "should we get" threads.....
...especially when the current season isn't even over.
It'd be nice if these could wait until the season is over, free agents are listed, needs can be addressed, etc.....
It's like a store getting Christmas stock in July.......
...there needs to be some sort of separation, imo..... ;)
Yeh, I can understand your point.....I just wanted to talk about someone else beside Portis.
Plus with Green on a one year contract might seem more realistic, because he is looking at the short term versus the long term. My only concern is how much money would he be asking for on a one year contract.
I love the Bells, but I also like Greens size and he is an excellent blocker. He is very similiar to Deuce McCallister. His only injury is that injured quadricep, not for sure if he's had any other major injuries.
Since 2000 he's rushed over 1,000 yds every season up until 2005 when he got injured and returned for 2006 and only needs 20 yrds to go over 1,000 this season. That's pretty good for a team that their offensive line is struggling.
WABronco
12-25-2006, 10:34 PM
He's been injured WAY too much for my taste......but if he wants to play for cheap (not likely), then why not? He's a solid vet and he can catch the ball too.
dogfish
12-25-2006, 10:37 PM
If it's for cheap, why not? He's also developed as a blocker and he's a good receiver out of the backfield.
how likely is it that a name player like him comes cheap? i suppose there are scenarios where i wouldn't be entirely opposed to it, but it's hardly anyone's idea of a long-term solution. . . it just makes so much more sense to spend a 1st day draft pick and try to find a back who we can pair with cutler for the next five years at the least-- enough with the revolving door at a position that's so vitally important to this team's success. . . .
sometimes you can get a nice payoff bringing in veterans, but a guy with green's history is likely to cost more than he's worth. . . i'd much rather see us target up-and-coming young players in free agency, such as dj hackett, kevin curtis or shaun macdonald, terdell sands, michael turner etc etc. . . besides, green has always been a notorious fumbler. . . .
TDMiller
12-25-2006, 10:40 PM
Here is more on Ahman Green
By TOM SILVERSTEIN/JS Online
Ask the Green Bay Packers coaches and they’ll tell you that Ahman Green is running the way he once did.
But if that’s true, why haven’t they found more ways to get their franchise back the ball, especially in light of the problems they’ve had running behind an offensive line featuring three rookies?
Now that he’s more than a year removed from the ruptured thigh tendon that cost him most of last season, Green’s strength in his legs appears completely back, and when he gets some running room he seems to make the most of it. But in the last three games, his touches have been down significantly, especially compared to early in the season.
Not being able to run the ball is a factor, as is getting behind early against the New York Jets and New England Patriots, but given Green’s ability to supplement his numbers with receiving yards, the Packers don’t seem to be maximizing his ability. What’s more, Green’s endurance seems to be playing a factor because he continually comes out of the game after three or four plays during any given drive.
“You’re trying to get him the ball so many times, but you’re trying to keep his rep(etition)s to a certain number,” coach Mike McCarthy said Wednesday. “But also (Vernand) Morency and Noah (Herron) have been productive players for us, so we’re keeping them involved, too. It’s not just go in there and go until you can’t go anymore. That’s not the approach.”
Here is the rest of the article:
http://www.ahman30.com/commerce/inthenews/inthenews.asp?reqdate=12/7/2006&id_passed=277
DBroncos4life
12-25-2006, 10:53 PM
30 isn't what it used to be. Look at Dunn, Barber, and Fred Taylor. Green also is having one of his best recieving years. I would love to get him in here for a one year deal.
Lorcust
12-25-2006, 10:57 PM
If we could get him for one-two years, why not?
Mike Anderson was 31 when he was running with us last year as the primary back, correct?
Well there you go.
Price has a lot to do with it, and if we get into a bidding war, I want little part of it.
A high-priced free agent acquisition would be better spent on a D-lineman like Charles Grant.
stnzed
12-25-2006, 11:01 PM
Deuce Staley.....Same mileage, less money!
(In other words....No thanx)
WABronco
12-25-2006, 11:04 PM
Deuce Staley.....Same mileage, less money!
No...but Staley is really done. Until he starts giving a dang and loses around 30 pounds he won't be anything but "done" either, IMO.
For some reason I saw quite a few Steeler's pre-season games this year...he's extremely slow and he didn't have much power or explosion. If you watched him, you would've said, "dang, that guy's done."
besides, green has always been a notorious fumbler. . . .
This is very true. Fans who've been frustrated with Tatum Bell recently will absolutely hate Green.
flbroncofan
12-25-2006, 11:19 PM
If we could get him for one-two years, why not?
Mike Anderson was 31 when he was running with us last year as the primary back, correct?
Well there you go.
Price has a lot to do with it, and if we get into a bidding war, I want little part of it.
A high-priced free agent acquisition would be better spent on a D-lineman like Charles Grant.
Right but didn't big Mike spend some time in the Marines (4 years...right??) and I think he was 26 when he came into the nfl. That's a big difference compared to a rb who came into the league when he was 21 or 22, correct?
stnzed
12-25-2006, 11:25 PM
No...but Staley is really done. Until he starts giving a dang and loses around 30 pounds he won't be anything but "done" either, IMO.
For some reason I saw quite a few Steeler's pre-season games this year...he's extremely slow and he didn't have much power or explosion. If you watched him, you would've said, "dang, that guy's done."
This is so true.....I guess it's been somewhat of a mini controvercy in Pittsburgh.
Why Cowher kept Staley this long/at all.
He's literally useless!
I was just pokin fun at the mileage on Green.
I'd like it, just because I'm a Husker fan, but he's too old and hurt at this point,
Too old....
For what?
A starter? Yes.
Do you honestly believe Shanny is done with both Bells after this season? I doubt it, yes Tatum may be traded, I dont know but unless Lynch falls to us in the draft we aren't looking for a new starter at rb but some better insurance past the Bells and maybe a lil competition or situational player. Green fits that, he has the experience and if we could get him for the right price or maybe a one year deal he may be worth it.
Buffalo118
12-26-2006, 05:39 PM
I'd rather have one of these college players for rb, instead of a bunch of has beens like Williams or Green (NFL Draft Scout):
Brian Leonard
Height: 6-1 Weight: 238
Position: FB Pos2: RB/Pos3: TE
40 Time: 4.56
Projected Round: 2
Tony Hunt
Height: 6-0 Weight: 225
Position: RB
Class/Draft Year: Sr/2007
40 Time: 4.54
Projected Round: 1-2
22cannon
12-26-2006, 06:15 PM
Hey if you want Ahman Green Why not Curtis Martin or Marshall Faulk?
TXBRONC
12-26-2006, 06:51 PM
if the medical staff was convinced he was healed.
yes I would take a flyer on him. This is the same guy who ran for over 1,800 yards a couple years back. 30 really isn't that old. He should have 2 or 3 more years in him if he is healthy.
I don't OP he's been a workhorse for several years I would be leary of bringing him in.
Rasti7
12-26-2006, 09:08 PM
How do Bronco Fans feel about bringing in another Green Bay Packer player.
He missed two games in October with a hamstring problem that likely was related to his quadriceps tendon injury.
Green is playing on a one-year contract, and the Packers face a tough decision about his future.
With the numbers he has put up this season, Green and his agent almost certainly will be seeking one more big-money contract. But given Green's age — he'll be 30 next season — the Packers might be reluctant to invest in him long-term.
It's too soon to know whether the Packers' offensive coaches will recommend that GM Ted Thompson try to bring him back next season, but they seem pleased with his production and the way he's bounced back from his injury.
"I think Green's getting stronger," offensive coordinator Jeff Jagodzinski said. "He's close to being a 1,000-yard rusher, and I thought before the season he'd be a 1,000-yard rusher. That's a testament to him the way he came back and battled back, so I don't think he's trailed off."
http://www.ahman30.com/commerce/inthenews/inthenews.asp?reqdate=12/17/2006&id_passed=282
I live in Wisconsin and though I cannot give you a direct article quote, I did read some time this season that he does want to finish his career in Green Bay. It also seemed that money wasn't a big issue but wanted a fair deal. Now, we must also take into account that people thoughts change. In my mind, I think he will stay in Green Bay. Also, I wouldn't want him in Denver. I don't think he is that much better or worse than what we have. I would prefer either someone that is better or younger with the potential to be better. I really don't know what a free agent. They will either cost too much or might be diminishing. I would prefer going after someone in the draft. You also have to take into account a million other things whether to bring in a free agent or draft someone. You have to look at other position needs and salary-cap, etc.. Lets leave it up to Shanahan. One thing he has proven is that he can get running backs or he can get a lot of production out lesser ones. We'll see.
How do Bronco Fans feel about bringing in another Green Bay Packer player.
He missed two games in October with a hamstring problem that likely was related to his quadriceps tendon injury.
Green is playing on a one-year contract, and the Packers face a tough decision about his future.
With the numbers he has put up this season, Green and his agent almost certainly will be seeking one more big-money contract. But given Green's age — he'll be 30 next season — the Packers might be reluctant to invest in him long-term.
It's too soon to know whether the Packers' offensive coaches will recommend that GM Ted Thompson try to bring him back next season, but they seem pleased with his production and the way he's bounced back from his injury.
"I think Green's getting stronger," offensive coordinator Jeff Jagodzinski said. "He's close to being a 1,000-yard rusher, and I thought before the season he'd be a 1,000-yard rusher. That's a testament to him the way he came back and battled back, so I don't think he's trailed off."
http://www.ahman30.com/commerce/inthenews/inthenews.asp?reqdate=12/17/2006&id_passed=282
No thanks! He's over the hill. I'd rather take a chance on Ricky Williams! :D
What about Michael Turner?????
TDMiller
12-27-2006, 07:48 PM
No thanks! He's over the hill. I'd rather take a chance on Ricky Williams! :D
Over the hill is a state mind...!
I don't think he is over the hill just yet. His age factor is not my biggest concern right now, as much as his what his asking price would be.
One thing is for sure is that, Green Bays offensive line needs serious upgrading and releasing Green just might free up the extra cash they need to bring in help for that offensive line.
rcsodak
12-27-2006, 08:23 PM
Over the hill is a state mind...!
I don't think he is over the hill just yet. His age factor is not my biggest concern right now, as much as his what his asking price would be.
One thing is for sure is that, Green Bays offensive line needs serious upgrading and releasing Green just might free up the extra cash they need to bring in help for that offensive line.
Green's about to break down for good....
...between the yardage in the pros and his owwies.....
...and the yardage/pounding he took with the fuskers......
....I'm sure there are guys out there with less mileage on their legs....
....like Dayne! He's like a 2yr vet, with his few carries in his career.....
....which is what Turner is.....low mileage, high gain.....but I'd imagine he'll not come cheap. I see the faiduhs going after him HARD.....since they've got little/no running game.
Who knows how he'd do in a zone scheme.....
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.