Hey Broncos fans, I plan to take a 3 day trip to San Francisco in October during fall break. I will be going with my wife and 8 year old daughter. Never been there, so I thought I'd pick your brains for input.
Which is a better place to stay if I want to be close to the stuff that families typically end up seeing as tourists? San Mateo or Oakland? I know San Mateo is closer to the airport but it is south of the airport and Oakland is north, not sure which one is closer to the tourist attractions.
I appreciate any input in advance.