Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by NVthosebroncos View Post
    Draft OJ Howard in 1st
    Curious if he will be available with # 20 ? I think the Broncos would have to move up as some have Tenn. taking him at #18.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    3,341
    Quote Originally Posted by colowoz View Post
    Curious if he will be available with # 20 ? I think the Broncos would have to move up as some have Tenn. taking him at #18.
    Walter Football has Titans taking him at 18, which is reasonable. Keep in mind though that I don't agree with WF having us take John Ross in the first. No way while we have a huge need at LT
    Superbowl 50 Champions!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Ft. Lewis, Washington
    Posts
    3,176
    When the hell are we going to sign Vance Walker back. I REALLY think he is worth the risk and money. All he does is increase our output in our rotating Dline. I see Peko and Kerr playing mostly in the rotation our NT. But as Sam and Butler has pointed out, it isn't a tradition 3-4, so they could play anywhere, kind of like Sly did. I am still glad we didn't sign him back. I can't believe Elway compared him to Trevor Pryce when he was drafted....pitiful.
    New England Patriots GM

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    1,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Gbt31 View Post
    When the hell are we going to sign Vance Walker back. I REALLY think he is worth the risk and money. All he does is increase our output in our rotating Dline. I see Peko and Kerr playing mostly in the rotation our NT. But as Sam and Butler has pointed out, it isn't a tradition 3-4, so they could play anywhere, kind of like Sly did. I am still glad we didn't sign him back. I can't believe Elway compared him to Trevor Pryce when he was drafted....pitiful.
    I think we should get Walker back, I've just been reading a article on Kerr and sounds like he could be starting at DE for us this season. He's got a huge ceiling and with Kollar here he'll try and get best out of him. If our group this season is Peko, Kerr, Wolfe, Crick, Gotis and potentially Walker That's not a bad group I'd like to see us still get a D-lineman in draft someone to replace Peko in a few seasons

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by samparnell View Post
    Alignment is one thing, but how run D is played from it is another. Wade Phillips plays one-gap/spill from an odd front which is more common from a split front. Two-gap/funnel run D is more common from an odd front.

    In an odd front two-gap, a 0 tech who commands a double is essential along with a couple of 4/5 techs who occupy blocks. It would probably be easier for Denver to convert from their odd front one-gap to a split front one-gap like Seattle plays. Going to either odd or split two gap would require different personnel. 4-3 would also require a true Mike Backer.

    I expect Denver's defensive front will look and play like they have the past two seasons; same coaches.
    I knew you would chime in and set-em straight Sam., we'll likely stay with the same under look we used under Wade.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •