Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,298

    The 6 Man O-Line

    Seems like there is a trend to use a 6th man on the o-line, Chiefs and Raiders are using it, if nothing else if half our division is using it we should know how to defend against it. If it give the QB more time, or helps the running game boy we could have used this last year but I think our coaching minds weren't too quick to try anything new. It would be interesting to be able to some how come up with plan to just march down the field, or at least when we need that first down after a timeout or inside the 5 or 10 yard line. I would assume that this would signal a run play, but if they cheat and don't rush the QB that leaves room for a deep throw to Henderson or DT.

    Does anyone remember when the Raiders used it against the Broncos?
    Denver Broncos 2015 - Win AFC West Division: , Win AFC Conference: , Beat SB 49 Champs (2X): , Win SB 50:

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    El Paso, Tx
    Posts
    1,623
    The pats tried it in the 2016 AFCCG against Miller and he still made Tom Brady his female dog.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,298
    Here is an interesting article that is a few years old about Atlanta trying this, it seemed to work pretty good for them since!

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...offensive-woes
    Denver Broncos 2015 - Win AFC West Division: , Win AFC Conference: , Beat SB 49 Champs (2X): , Win SB 50:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,388
    I'm a fan of it. I'm surprised more people don't use it. For one, our O line was horrible last year so they could use the help. But honestly, if you want to set the tone, add more beef. Not saying it should be base offense, but when you want to establish the run and not be shy about, add that extra o lineman. Especially with the WR duo we have. Most teams would try to counter the extra lineman in some way or take a DB off the field. That should open something up for on of the WRs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Las Manzanitas, NM
    Posts
    27,384
    One way to accomplish a similar effect using five O-Linemen is unbalanced tandem tackle over. We might even see that a little this year because McCoy used it in 2011.
    "Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes." ~ Publilius Syrus

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,298
    I would just like to see the OC come up with something that may catch a defense a little off guard and possibly execution something new that produces a fair rate of success. It may not be successful against all teams, but against the right team it may make a difference if used wisely.
    Denver Broncos 2015 - Win AFC West Division: , Win AFC Conference: , Beat SB 49 Champs (2X): , Win SB 50:

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    9,370
    Quote Originally Posted by champ&dreallday View Post
    I'm a fan of it. I'm surprised more people don't use it. For one, our O line was horrible last year so they could use the help. But honestly, if you want to set the tone, add more beef. Not saying it should be base offense, but when you want to establish the run and not be shy about, add that extra o lineman. Especially with the WR duo we have. Most teams would try to counter the extra lineman in some way or take a DB off the field. That should open something up for on of the WRs.
    Sure we had issues on the edges but we also had a lot of penetration, often with delayed blitzes or stunts, or just a miscommunication in blocking assignments. A 6th blocker on the line can help seal the edge but can't fix that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    9,370
    Quote Originally Posted by samparnell View Post
    One way to accomplish a similar effect using five O-Linemen is unbalanced tandem tackle over. We might even see that a little this year because McCoy used it in 2011.
    Didn't we use an unbalanced line with Manning at times. I think I remember at least one either it was unbalanced and/or he received the snap from the guard.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Edge of Orange
    Posts
    2,931
    The only problem I have with this logic is the Broncos need to have 6 capable Olinemen. I'm not sure they even have 4 at this point.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Las Manzanitas, NM
    Posts
    27,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Rastic View Post
    Didn't we use an unbalanced line with Manning at times. I think I remember at least one either it was unbalanced and/or he received the snap from the guard.
    That may be. If one of the Guards has snapped in practice, that would be a way to unbalance the line. It causes problems for the alignment of the defensive front.

    The original Single Wing was unbalanced. There was a Guard and an End to the left of the Center, and four on LOS to his right producing a long and short side of the formation.

    If you can, go back and look at the game at Oakland in 2011. Willis McGahee scored about a 60 yard TD run from tandem tackle over. Clady lined up on the right next to Orlando Franklin and the End on the left may have been Daniel Fells, or it could have been Chris Clark since they both played short side End that year.

    Unbalanced can be run from under center or from gun with one or two back personnel packages. It isn't used that often and defenses usually need to make adjustments to defend the plays that can be run from it. When defenses make adjustments, those can be attacked.
    "Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes." ~ Publilius Syrus

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    10,449
    I am hoping our TE situation improves and we do not need to consider this

    Anything it takes to get the ol working tho is bottom line
    "Preservation of our environment is not a liberal or conservative challenge, it's common sense" RONALD REAGAN

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •