View Poll Results: are the Broncos offseason moves so far good?

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes

    16 94.12%
  • no

    1 5.88%
  • i dont care if they are?

    0 0%
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    pennsylvania
    Posts
    35

    offseason moves so far

    Are our offseason moves so far good or a mistake?
    denver is number one and always will be!!!!!! forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!and 31 other teams suck !!!!!!!!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Posts
    1,754
    Yes

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,590
    Yep

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Johnstown , PA
    Posts
    4,520
    Yes but would be even better if we pick up corey dillon.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,590
    Originally posted by BroncosFanInPA
    Yes but would be even better if we pick up corey dillon.
    I dont think hes worth it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Johnstown , PA
    Posts
    4,520
    Originally posted by EddyMac87
    I dont think hes worth it.
    Oh he's worth it. He could put up 2,000 yards on this team, is that not something you would like to see?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,590
    Originally posted by BroncosFanInPA
    Oh he's worth it. He could put up 2,000 yards on this team, is that not something you would like to see?
    Trust me i'd love to see another 2,000 yard runner on the broncos, but i seriously doubt dillion can do it. He's what 30 years old? i honestly think Q could have a better season then dillion. Dont get me wrong i think dillion WAS a great back. He's to far past his prime.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Johnstown , PA
    Posts
    4,520
    Originally posted by EddyMac87
    Trust me i'd love to see another 2,000 yard runner on the broncos, but i seriously doubt dillion can do it. He's what 30 years old? i honestly think Q could have a better season then dillion. Dont get me wrong i think dillion WAS a great back. He's to far past his prime.
    Fact: Corey Dillon is 1 of only 4 players in nfl history to rush for over 1,000 yards in his first 6 years in the nfl joining Curtis Martin, Eric ****erson, & Barry Sanders. Pretty dam good company there.

    The streak ended in 2003 because he was injured most of the year & the emergance of Rudy Johnson so he didn't see much playing time.

    So yes he is 30 but has played only 7 years so i don't believe that he is washed up just yet, i give him 2 or 3 more really good years, because Barry did it for 10 years before he left.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Johnstown , PA
    Posts
    4,520
    Why the editing on that? That is his name.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,590
    Originally posted by BroncosFanInPA
    Fact: Corey Dillon is 1 of only 4 players in nfl history to rush for over 1,000 yards in his first 6 years in the nfl joining Curtis Martin, Eric ****erson, & Barry Sanders. Pretty dam good company there.

    The streak ended in 2003 because he was injured most of the year & the emergance of Rudy Johnson so he didn't see much playing time.

    So yes he is 30 but has played only 7 years so i don't believe that he is washed up just yet, i give him 2 or 3 more really good years, because Barry did it for 10 years before he left.
    I dont think he'll have 3 good years left. Mabye one. The steak ended because he was hurt, he was hurt because he is older and its harder for him to take it. If he was in the FA, then mabye i wouldnt mind getting him. I just dont think he's worth a second round pick, i dont even think hes worth a third rounder. We could use the pick to get a rb just as good but 8 years younger. Or stick with Q!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Johnstown , PA
    Posts
    4,520
    Originally posted by EddyMac87
    I dont think he'll have 3 good years left. Mabye one. The steak ended because he was hurt, he was hurt because he is older and its harder for him to take it. If he was in the FA, then mabye i wouldnt mind getting him. I just dont think he's worth a second round pick, i dont even think hes worth a third rounder. We could use the pick to get a rb just as good but 8 years younger. Or stick with Q!
    So you would rather have an inexperienced player over one who is proven? I just don't see how having yet another rookie is the answer.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,590
    Originally posted by BroncosFanInPA
    So you would rather have an inexperienced player over one who is proven? I just don't see how having yet another rookie is the answer.
    Q, lol, i really think Q will be our starter next year, and he'll do just fine. And yes i would rather trust shanahan in drafting a back then have dillion.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Virginia Beach , Virginia
    Posts
    2,603
    why get rid of 1 me me me runing back for another me me me running back...........
    Go Broncos, Capitals, and Orioles


    http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/5...ohersiglq6.jpg
    Thanks SNK16

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Anywhere, EVERYWHERE
    Posts
    9,238
    Originally posted by BroncosFanInPA
    So you would rather have an inexperienced player over one who is proven? I just don't see how having yet another rookie is the answer.
    Answer your own question:

    Terrell Davis
    Orlandis Gary
    Mike Anderson
    Clinton Portis
    "It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
    tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of
    men."

    -- Samuel Adams
    "that you could as soon scrub the blackamoor white, as to change the principles of a profest Democrat; and that he will leave nothing unattempted to overturn the Government of this Country.-- George Washington 1798

    Quote Originally Posted by vandyman53
    I concur. RC's current signature is in my opinion well within guidelines
    Jacks RULE!!!!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



TRUSTe Certified Privacy Seal