PDA

View Full Version : Broncos' interest in Chris Crocker



chad72
04-07-2012, 08:20 PM
http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/id/42644/tollefson-a-solid-addition-in-oakland

Broncoholic3233
04-07-2012, 08:24 PM
We don't really need anymore durability issues in the secondary.

But depth is depth I suppose.

xX-Bronco-Xx
04-07-2012, 08:35 PM
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xt8YFRj6vAI/TWE5dfJqN6I/AAAAAAAADnw/jq5EXN2C_gA/s1600/chris-crocker.jpg

ERoyal248
04-07-2012, 08:37 PM
Wouldn't hate it, but Carter played well down the stretch, i'd rather him start, but if they do it, wouldn't be that mad.

Captain_23
04-07-2012, 08:50 PM
Chris Crocker is garbage.. i remember when he was in atlanta, and was eventually cut even when atlanta had garbage safeties all around. Im willing to bet he cant even beat out moore, and bruton for a safety spot. He is trash, please stay away from that bum

Iron Clady
04-07-2012, 11:21 PM
Would be dumb. Just brought in Mike Adams to start. Carter and Rahim are both young with potential. Bruton should stay for ST. Crocker isn't even good. Just keep Rafael Bush for youth and ST.

Papa-pwn
04-08-2012, 02:06 AM
Bilk is saying he could see us being interested. Not that we actually have interest. So, I doubt we have any.

japfaff
04-08-2012, 02:44 AM
Would be dumb. Just brought in Mike Adams to start. Carter and Rahim are both young with potential. Bruton should stay for ST. Crocker isn't even good. Just keep Rafael Bush for youth and ST.

Rahim and potential are to words that just don't go together...Unless you are talking about something off the field

theMileHighGuy
04-08-2012, 02:45 AM
Would rather watch Rahim and Quinton miss arm tackles instead of watching Crocker break his arms tackling.

raziel
04-08-2012, 08:34 AM
Leave chris crocker alone!!!

Kazmo
04-08-2012, 09:27 AM
Rahim and potential are to words that just don't go together...Unless you are talking about something off the field

What are you talking about? Rahim Moore has TONS of potential. Your comment seemed pretty short-sighted.

LarryDean
04-08-2012, 09:50 AM
In other AFC West news:

I could see Denver, Kansas City and San Diego all considering Chris Crocker, who was just cut by the Bengals. All three teams could use a veteran safety and have considered options this offseason. Crocker, who has durability issues, is 32 and he was a captain.



:paper:

:yawn:

-Rod-
04-08-2012, 10:07 AM
Misled by the misleading title that misleads.

http://www.4freeimagehost.com/uploads/82e5994e9e0e.jpg

Iron Clady
04-08-2012, 10:26 AM
Rahim and potential are to words that just don't go together...Unless you are talking about something off the field

He was atrocious as a rookie but was a 2nd round pick who many analysts believed was a borderline 1st round pick. To say he doesn't have potential is ignorant. He has athleticism and ball skills. All reports I've seen imply he's a hard worker. He's very young. He needs a lot of work though both physically and mentally. He better be working his ass off this offseason working out, studying the Playbook, and studying gamefilm.

InElwayWeTrust
04-08-2012, 11:19 AM
I can here to make a smartass comment.


But it looks like you guys got it covered. :laugh:

BroncoooJohnson
04-09-2012, 02:06 PM
Rahim and potential are to words that just don't go together...Unless you are talking about something off the field

Rahim has potential.

^try correcting that statement correctly.

assassin216
04-09-2012, 02:14 PM
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xt8YFRj6vAI/TWE5dfJqN6I/AAAAAAAADnw/jq5EXN2C_gA/s1600/chris-crocker.jpg

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

johnjoda
04-09-2012, 06:02 PM
How about some Jim Leonhard at safety?