View Full Version : [Nuggets] Michael Redd

The Experience
08-22-2012, 12:42 PM
Nuggets are interested in him. We need a shooter badly and he is one of the best. I say bring him in....

08-22-2012, 12:43 PM
Where have you read that the Nuggets have a huge interest in him?

All I keep seeing is Vic Lombardi really wants us to get him.

Haven't really seen anything saying the Nuggets are targeting him.

08-22-2012, 12:47 PM
Michael Redd is broken down.......I don't want him at all.

The Experience
08-22-2012, 12:52 PM
Sam Amico of Fox Sports reports our interest.

The Experience
08-22-2012, 12:53 PM
Michael Redd is broken down.......I don't want him at all.

True he is not what he once was. But, we don't need him to be what he once was. We just need a dude who can shoot consistently off the bench. Redd fits that bill....

08-22-2012, 01:09 PM
Sam Amico of Fox Sports reports our interest.

Hmmm. Gotcha.

Well....idk if I'd want him or not.

I like our team the way it is. We already have enough trouble getting players time.

We have Chandler as our 6. Then dre needs time. Brewer deserves time with his defense and streaky shooting. JHam can shoot.

So, probably not. But, wouldn't be pissed if we got em.

08-22-2012, 01:14 PM
I would be ok if he signed a 1 year minimum contract, but I think we're fine with Randolph, Hamilton and Stone on the bench. Fournier and Quincy Miller are supposed to be pretty good shooters too. This team might be more talented top to bottom than the team that took us to the WCF.

08-22-2012, 02:54 PM
I wouldn't touch Mike Redd. He hasn't had a good season in years and he has more bad luck regarding his knees than Bynum. It's a shame, really. He used to be one of the streakiest shooters in the league and now his career is all but buried.

If he was able to stay healthy I would say this would be a decent pickup for Denver.

08-23-2012, 10:29 AM
Redd hasn't shot over 40% beyond the arch since 2002-2003. No thank you.

08-23-2012, 01:27 PM
No thank you. I want to go with our youngsters now.