PDA

View Full Version : ESPN's Top 32 Free Agents



BroncosB2B
03-01-2005, 02:26 PM
Kenoy is at No. 11, and they don't project him being back here. Hmmm..... :coffee:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2002360

Peerless
03-01-2005, 02:27 PM
Kenoy is at No. 11, and they don't project him being back here. Hmmm..... :coffee:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2002360
Thanks dude!

2 Minute Warning
03-01-2005, 02:34 PM
Kenoy is at No. 11, and they don't project him being back here. Hmmm..... :coffee:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2002360
Thanks for the link :cheers:

ATL5515
03-01-2005, 02:34 PM
Kenoy is at No. 11, and they don't project him being back here. Hmmm..... :coffee:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2002360

i really hope the falcons pick him up

BroncosB2B
03-01-2005, 02:36 PM
i really hope the falcons pick him up

I don't. Kenoy is awesome.

EMCF
03-01-2005, 02:37 PM
What is he talking about? Kennedy and Hamilton are both on the verge of resigning.

myoung
03-01-2005, 02:43 PM
Good article. I see that we are projected to not be in the running for any of them. I would like to see us make a move for Williams or Ferguson.

KnightOLB53
03-01-2005, 02:54 PM
I wonder why it doesnt project us to get anyone...

BroncosB2B
03-01-2005, 02:56 PM
Probably because the Broncos are trying to lose everyone...

ATL5515
03-01-2005, 02:57 PM
is that the right picture for jonas jennings?
No.16

ReleaseTheBeast7
03-01-2005, 03:05 PM
Kenoy is at No. 11, and they don't project him being back here. Hmmm..... :coffee:

Good, HE SUCKS!

DPg2003
03-01-2005, 03:18 PM
I hope we make a run at Marques Douglas with a long-term deal.

DPg2003
03-01-2005, 03:22 PM
Good, HE SUCKS!

Kennedy doesn't suck, the tandem of Kennedy and Lynch in coverage sucks.
We can't afford to put those two back there again.


While I hope we don't re-sign Kennedy, it's not because he is a bad player. It's because we signed John Lynch last year to a 3 year contract and he is not going to the bench. Lynch needs to move to SS and we need to put a FS back there with him that can cover alot of field. That is the only way that Lynch is going to be effective at this stage in his career.

ReleaseTheBeast7
03-01-2005, 03:42 PM
Kennedy doesn't suck, the tandem of Kennedy and Lynch in coverage sucks.
We can't afford to put those two back there again.


While I hope we don't re-sign Kennedy, it's not because he is a bad player. It's because we signed John Lynch last year to a 3 year contract and he is not going to the bench. Lynch needs to move to SS and we need to put a FS back there with him that can cover alot of field. That is the only way that Lynch is going to be effective at this stage in his career.

Can't intercept a ball, and does nothing but helmet-to-helmets... He sucks.

DPg2003
03-01-2005, 03:46 PM
Can't intercept a ball, and does nothing but helmet-to-helmets... He sucks.

So John Lynch sucks??? So Donovan Darius sucks???

I have a question, how is supposed to come in for a big hit?? With his head straight up in the air?? Kennedy is the prototype SS. An intimadator who plays the run and blows up receivers coming across the middle, he does not suck.

JoRo
03-01-2005, 04:15 PM
Kenoy is at No. 11, and they don't project him being back here. Hmmm..... :coffee:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2002360

We arent on any of those as teams to go to

Fat Joe
03-01-2005, 04:38 PM
Well its a good thing ESPN is almost always wrong with there predictions.



I love how many people they say Oakland is going to pick up while there struggling to get under the cap right now. So stupid, so so stupid.

DPg2003
03-01-2005, 04:52 PM
Well its a good thing ESPN is almost always wrong with there predictions.



I love how many people they say Oakland is going to pick up while there struggling to get under the cap right now. So stupid, so so stupid.

If you let Raiderjoe tell it the Raiders are just letting on about their cap troubles and they are going to sign Lamont Jordan and rule the NFL.

OhNoKoolAid
03-01-2005, 05:03 PM
If you let Raiderjoe tell it the Raiders are just letting on about their cap troubles and they are going to sign Lamont Jordan and rule the NFL.

How does Lamont Jordan solve all of their problems anyways? He is a malcontent, injury risk that was given several otions to proove himself as the Jets starter of the future, but would rather pout instead. He looks decent in a third down role, but that is also fresh legs late in games, hard to transfer into a starting projection. For a guy that can't stay healthy in a back-up role, I'd love to see him "starting" for the Raiders. He solves none of their problems, and as I've said before, Norv Turner always finds a way to stagnate offensive talent.

DPg2003
03-01-2005, 05:14 PM
How does Lamont Jordan solve all of their problems anyways? He is a malcontent, injury risk that was given several otions to proove himself as the Jets starter of the future, but would rather pout instead. He looks decent in a third down role, but that is also fresh legs late in games, hard to transfer into a starting projection. For a guy that can't stay healthy in a back-up role, I'd love to see him "starting" for the Raiders. He solves none of their problems, and as I've said before, Norv Turner always finds a way to stagnate offensive talent.

Exactly. Jordan wants a big contract and he will only eat up most of what cap space they can create.

Orange_Crush21
03-01-2005, 10:15 PM
I wonder why it doesnt project us to get anyone...

Because Len Pasquarelli always seems to discount the Broncos. No big deal.

speedracer2411
03-02-2005, 02:30 PM
i dont understand y they say rolle will be in washington they already have really good corners o well

myoung
03-02-2005, 03:21 PM
i dont understand y they say rolle will be in washington they already have really good corners o well

Fred Smoot is as good as gone.