Tweet
Recieved this in a Contributor Status Comment.
Someone sent me this in a contributor status comment:
On behalf of several members of the community, I would like to express my shock and disappointment at some of your rodomontades. It is requisite, even in this summary sketch, to go back a few years to see how you may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider you to be a weapon of mass destruction yourself. Anyone who follows today's debates on absenteeism and, by happenstance, is also familiar with your infantile philippics is struck by that old truism: If you don’t like it here, then perhaps you should go elsewhere. You used to complain about being persecuted. Now you are our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that you must have recently made a huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies. How else could you manage to tell us that the moon is made of green cheese?
Plainly stated, seeing you succeed at pushing our efforts two steps backward has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as "How can he be so unctuous?" Due to the power relationship between the dominator and the dominated, you are like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between you and a pigeon is that you intend to impede the free flow of information. That's why you are like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is busy trying to deny citizens the ability to become informed about the destruction that he is capable of. I aver that you will indubitably scar little children's self-image sooner or later. I base this confident prediction on, among other things, the fact that his comments are often appallingly addlepated, sometimes impudent, frequently off-point, and occasionally ultra-maladroit. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about you. They tell us that you intend to promote mediocrity over merit.
Regardless of what you seem to avouch, you are a shoo-in for this year's awarding of "most disrespectful use of prætorianism". I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, obstreperous world run by ignominious dissemblers. His readiness to call me warped has to be the most egregious example imaginable of the pot calling the kettle black. It is also worthy of note that some people don't seem to mind that you like to require religious services around the world to begin with "Brancos is great; Brancos is good; we thank Brancos for our daily food". What a disgusting world we live in!
Do you really want to subvert time-tested societal norms? I think not. Difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to argue about your pranks. We're the ones who are right, not you. I don't mean to throw fuel on an already considerable fire, but his bromides are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that you once used to spam the Internet with ill-bred e-mail.
While there are many barbaric dips, you are the most pathological of the lot. By now, the reader has discerned that you are bound to have a rude awakening when you finally realize how few people approve of his yellow-bellied politics. So let me just add that you deny ever having tried to impugn the patriotism of his rivals. I assume you are merely trying to cover his posterior, as the truth is that you recently went through a neocolonialism phase in which you tried repeatedly to promote, foster, and institute diabolism. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that this theme is stated in one form or another in every one of Man's great religions. (Actually, you don't need a preschool diploma to understand that this should not and need not be the case, but that's not important now.) I close this letter along the same lines it opened on: Brancos easily impresses his helpers using big words like "characteristicalness".
Plainly stated, seeing you succeed at pushing our efforts two steps backward has left me with a number of unanswered questions—questions such as "How can he be so unctuous?" Due to the power relationship between the dominator and the dominated, you are like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between you and a pigeon is that you intend to impede the free flow of information. That's why you are like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is busy trying to deny citizens the ability to become informed about the destruction that he is capable of. I aver that you will indubitably scar little children's self-image sooner or later. I base this confident prediction on, among other things, the fact that his comments are often appallingly addlepated, sometimes impudent, frequently off-point, and occasionally ultra-maladroit. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about you. They tell us that you intend to promote mediocrity over merit.
Regardless of what you seem to avouch, you are a shoo-in for this year's awarding of "most disrespectful use of prætorianism". I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, obstreperous world run by ignominious dissemblers. His readiness to call me warped has to be the most egregious example imaginable of the pot calling the kettle black. It is also worthy of note that some people don't seem to mind that you like to require religious services around the world to begin with "Brancos is great; Brancos is good; we thank Brancos for our daily food". What a disgusting world we live in!
Do you really want to subvert time-tested societal norms? I think not. Difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to argue about your pranks. We're the ones who are right, not you. I don't mean to throw fuel on an already considerable fire, but his bromides are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that you once used to spam the Internet with ill-bred e-mail.
While there are many barbaric dips, you are the most pathological of the lot. By now, the reader has discerned that you are bound to have a rude awakening when you finally realize how few people approve of his yellow-bellied politics. So let me just add that you deny ever having tried to impugn the patriotism of his rivals. I assume you are merely trying to cover his posterior, as the truth is that you recently went through a neocolonialism phase in which you tried repeatedly to promote, foster, and institute diabolism. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that this theme is stated in one form or another in every one of Man's great religions. (Actually, you don't need a preschool diploma to understand that this should not and need not be the case, but that's not important now.) I close this letter along the same lines it opened on: Brancos easily impresses his helpers using big words like "characteristicalness".
FA Targets: DT Jason Jones, DT Pat Simms, S Reggie Smith, LB Dan Connor 
Comment