Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Guide to Chutes and Ladders?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guide to Chutes and Ladders?

    All I can find is this:

    http://books.google.com/books?id=ZnC...page&q&f=false

  • #2




    /thread
    2013 Adopt-a-Bronco: Demaryius Thomas

    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      I will have to give that novel a read.

      Comment


      • #4
        It seems that before I launch into this letter, I should tell you that the longer Brancos wears the mask of Bonapartism, the harder it is to remove. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about the most meretricious voluptuaries you'll ever see. When I first heard about his contrivances, I dismissed them as merely spleeny. But when I later learned that Brancos wants me to have an identity crisis, I realized that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that some termagant, fastidious hellions actually allege that Brancos holds a universal license that allows him to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. This is the kind of muddled thinking that he is encouraging with his excuses. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as eccentric, sanctimonious despots. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. I consider Brancos's monographs antithetical to my principles as a person concerned for the good of all. So what's the connection between that and Brancos's traducements? The connection is that what we're involved in with him is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person—every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility—must concern himself with it.

        It is quite true, of course, that Brancos tries to make his theories more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. But Brancos gets a lot of perks from the system. True to form, he ceaselessly moves the goalposts to prevent others from benefiting from the same perks. This suggests that Brancos plans to relabel millions of people as "snotty". What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Brancos is always willing to sacrifice somebody else's life, just not his own. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding his promotion of Comstockism. Tell everyone you know that someone has been giving Brancos's brain a very thorough washing, and now Brancos is trying to do the same to us.

        Many experts now believe that whenever Brancos is presented with the statement that his litanies disgust and infuriate me, he spews out the hackneyed excuse that he can change his capricious ways. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that Brancos says that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to lower scholastic standards. He whines about catty sciolists, yet Brancos enthusiastically supports grumpy, subhuman sybarites. I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that Brancos is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally myopic metanarratives.

        Whenever Brancos tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that he has been putting our liberties at risk by a footling and meddlesome rush to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. If there were any semblance of decency left in his coalition that ought to be an affront to it. Sadly, that's a big "if"; we all know that Brancos insists that he has no choice but to further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law. His reasoning is that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Yes, I realize that that argument makes no sense, but Brancos is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is busy trying to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel.

        The two things I just mentioned—the way that Brancos is so intolerantly devoted to his own prejudices that his perception of reality is utterly warped and the fact that his worshippers are so ready to make human life negligible and cheap that their ruses are laughable—may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that he has hatched all sorts of sneaky plans. Remember Brancos's attempt to inculcate humorless inclinations? No? That's because Brancos is so good at concealing his expansionism-oriented, merciless activities. Unimaginative, irascible conspiracy theorists simply pass through this world sowing the seeds of evil. Do give that some thought.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jetrazor74 View Post
          It seems that before I launch into this letter, I should tell you that the longer Brancos wears the mask of Bonapartism, the harder it is to remove. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about the most meretricious voluptuaries you'll ever see. When I first heard about his contrivances, I dismissed them as merely spleeny. But when I later learned that Brancos wants me to have an identity crisis, I realized that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that some termagant, fastidious hellions actually allege that Brancos holds a universal license that allows him to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. This is the kind of muddled thinking that he is encouraging with his excuses. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as eccentric, sanctimonious despots. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. I consider Brancos's monographs antithetical to my principles as a person concerned for the good of all. So what's the connection between that and Brancos's traducements? The connection is that what we're involved in with him is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person—every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility—must concern himself with it.

          It is quite true, of course, that Brancos tries to make his theories more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. But Brancos gets a lot of perks from the system. True to form, he ceaselessly moves the goalposts to prevent others from benefiting from the same perks. This suggests that Brancos plans to relabel millions of people as "snotty". What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Brancos is always willing to sacrifice somebody else's life, just not his own. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding his promotion of Comstockism. Tell everyone you know that someone has been giving Brancos's brain a very thorough washing, and now Brancos is trying to do the same to us.

          Many experts now believe that whenever Brancos is presented with the statement that his litanies disgust and infuriate me, he spews out the hackneyed excuse that he can change his capricious ways. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that Brancos says that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to lower scholastic standards. He whines about catty sciolists, yet Brancos enthusiastically supports grumpy, subhuman sybarites. I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that Brancos is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally myopic metanarratives.

          Whenever Brancos tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that he has been putting our liberties at risk by a footling and meddlesome rush to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. If there were any semblance of decency left in his coalition that ought to be an affront to it. Sadly, that's a big "if"; we all know that Brancos insists that he has no choice but to further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law. His reasoning is that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Yes, I realize that that argument makes no sense, but Brancos is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is busy trying to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel.

          The two things I just mentioned—the way that Brancos is so intolerantly devoted to his own prejudices that his perception of reality is utterly warped and the fact that his worshippers are so ready to make human life negligible and cheap that their ruses are laughable—may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that he has hatched all sorts of sneaky plans. Remember Brancos's attempt to inculcate humorless inclinations? No? That's because Brancos is so good at concealing his expansionism-oriented, merciless activities. Unimaginative, irascible conspiracy theorists simply pass through this world sowing the seeds of evil. Do give that some thought.
          I find this thesis to be quite desirable to a astrological convention. You rewrite the quotations on the fourth stanza to make the letters form a complete unity.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Brancos View Post
            I find this thesis to be quite desirable to a astrological convention. You rewrite the quotations on the fourth stanza to make the letters form a complete unity.
            While my better instincts counsel me to follow a policy of laissez-faire, there are a couple of Porsche's statements I feel I cannot let pass. Let's get down to brass tacks: Porsche's egocentric ballyhoos often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of fascism and totalitarianism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain. It would be nice to say that odious irrationalism doesn't exist anymore but we all know that it does.

            I plan to break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom. Are you with me—or against me? Whatever you decide, if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less craven than Porsche. What I find frightening is that some academics actually believe Porsche's line that neo-shrewish despots should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. In this case, "academics" refers to a stratum of the residual intelligentsia surviving the recession of its demotic base, not to those seekers of truth who understand that while Porsche and other unmannerly maggots sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that the virus of egotism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Porsche's paroxysms, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that Porsche recently got caught red-handed trying to manipulate everything and everybody. Well, surprise, surprise, surprise, as Gomer Pyle would say. Okay, have you had enough of this letter? Good. Let's end it by reiterating that nobody likes rotten, raucous nebbishes.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jetrazor74 View Post
              It seems that before I launch into this letter, I should tell you that the longer Brancos wears the mask of Bonapartism, the harder it is to remove. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about the most meretricious voluptuaries you'll ever see. When I first heard about his contrivances, I dismissed them as merely spleeny. But when I later learned that Brancos wants me to have an identity crisis, I realized that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that some termagant, fastidious hellions actually allege that Brancos holds a universal license that allows him to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. This is the kind of muddled thinking that he is encouraging with his excuses. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as eccentric, sanctimonious despots. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. I consider Brancos's monographs antithetical to my principles as a person concerned for the good of all. So what's the connection between that and Brancos's traducements? The connection is that what we're involved in with him is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person—every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility—must concern himself with it.

              It is quite true, of course, that Brancos tries to make his theories more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. But Brancos gets a lot of perks from the system. True to form, he ceaselessly moves the goalposts to prevent others from benefiting from the same perks. This suggests that Brancos plans to relabel millions of people as "snotty". What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Brancos is always willing to sacrifice somebody else's life, just not his own. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding his promotion of Comstockism. Tell everyone you know that someone has been giving Brancos's brain a very thorough washing, and now Brancos is trying to do the same to us.

              Many experts now believe that whenever Brancos is presented with the statement that his litanies disgust and infuriate me, he spews out the hackneyed excuse that he can change his capricious ways. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that Brancos says that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. What he means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to lower scholastic standards. He whines about catty sciolists, yet Brancos enthusiastically supports grumpy, subhuman sybarites. I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that Brancos is locked into his present course of destruction. He does not have the interest or the will to change his fundamentally myopic metanarratives.

              Whenever Brancos tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that he has been putting our liberties at risk by a footling and meddlesome rush to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. If there were any semblance of decency left in his coalition that ought to be an affront to it. Sadly, that's a big "if"; we all know that Brancos insists that he has no choice but to further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law. His reasoning is that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. Yes, I realize that that argument makes no sense, but Brancos is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is busy trying to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel.

              The two things I just mentioned—the way that Brancos is so intolerantly devoted to his own prejudices that his perception of reality is utterly warped and the fact that his worshippers are so ready to make human life negligible and cheap that their ruses are laughable—may sound like they're completely unrelated, but they're not. The common link is that he has hatched all sorts of sneaky plans. Remember Brancos's attempt to inculcate humorless inclinations? No? That's because Brancos is so good at concealing his expansionism-oriented, merciless activities. Unimaginative, irascible conspiracy theorists simply pass through this world sowing the seeds of evil. Do give that some thought.
              I am soooooo lost.
              sigpic

              "Maybe if he had an iron suit or a magic hammer...."

              Comment


              • #8
                Time and space are not constant. The only constant is the speed of light.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I stepped on a lemon. It caught on fire. I put it out using Planck's constant.
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by PowderAddict View Post
                    Time and space are not constant. The only constant is the speed of light.
                    Under certain conditions and temperature that is....

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Bumble Bee Tuna, your balls are showing........
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by thatkidhunt View Post
                        Bumble Bee Tuna, your balls are showing........


                        This thread is going places!
                        Brock you like a hurricane!
                        sigpic
                        Think of a bigger, stronger, more handsome Eli Manning.... That's Fargo.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by thatkidhunt View Post
                          Bumble Bee Tuna, your balls are showing........

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            i bookmarked this thread to read another time when i have interest :thumb:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Gatorgirl View Post
                              i bookmarked this thread to read another time when i have interest :thumb:
                              lol don't... its just a bunch of nothingness... generated

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X