The Bounty mess in New Orleans is pretty sad, but also reminds me of the age old debate.......do you do something "bad" if you can get away with it? I am not sure, but I am inclined to think that there are varying degrees of similar activity around the NFL (over the years), but as of now, they have not been caught. Then again, I could be way off base here. I think the fact the Saints were warned about the situation is why they have been punished to the extent they have (so far)......and this before the tapes we got wind of in the last couple of days. To put a close to this example.....I recently read from an ex NFLer that bounties of pretty nasty consequence have been around for a long time. They just weren't/haven't been caught.
I digress. This article is not specifically about the bounty mess.
But here's the basic question for you, and I wonder what you think about it.....if you know that you can get away with it, do you do things that are basically wrong? Isn't that unethical at any level?
For sure there are varying degrees of wrong. For example, not stopping at a stop sign, in an open, desolate country spot may not be such a big deal. It's still wrong, but common sense tells you that is not intrinsically a bad thing, whether this is an area that is policed or not. There are various factors involved that make things wrong.
But think a little bigger in terms of impact.......if you knew you could get a deal on a purchase because the price tag was clearly in error, would you? Or if you knew that you got credit for something you weren't really responsible for, do you accept it?
These are still relatively small offences (pending the level of the so called reward).....now consider this one.....what if you had a fairly big car accident, and you knew you were the primary offender, and yet the only nearby witness (who may have been overwhelmed at the time) mistakenly reported that you were not the instigator. Would you live with that, even though the witness was convinced that you were innocent, and police had no other info to dismiss that evidence?
The level and degree of consequence goes up.......and I won't go there. Clearly, the smaller the offence, the less critical the impact. But still, just because you can get away with things.......do you? I am sure many of us have on some small level....but even then, I would contest that small things can lead to bigger ones in time. What is acceptable? Can you draw that line?
Common sense and decent values go a long way here......
I digress. This article is not specifically about the bounty mess.
But here's the basic question for you, and I wonder what you think about it.....if you know that you can get away with it, do you do things that are basically wrong? Isn't that unethical at any level?
For sure there are varying degrees of wrong. For example, not stopping at a stop sign, in an open, desolate country spot may not be such a big deal. It's still wrong, but common sense tells you that is not intrinsically a bad thing, whether this is an area that is policed or not. There are various factors involved that make things wrong.
But think a little bigger in terms of impact.......if you knew you could get a deal on a purchase because the price tag was clearly in error, would you? Or if you knew that you got credit for something you weren't really responsible for, do you accept it?
These are still relatively small offences (pending the level of the so called reward).....now consider this one.....what if you had a fairly big car accident, and you knew you were the primary offender, and yet the only nearby witness (who may have been overwhelmed at the time) mistakenly reported that you were not the instigator. Would you live with that, even though the witness was convinced that you were innocent, and police had no other info to dismiss that evidence?
The level and degree of consequence goes up.......and I won't go there. Clearly, the smaller the offence, the less critical the impact. But still, just because you can get away with things.......do you? I am sure many of us have on some small level....but even then, I would contest that small things can lead to bigger ones in time. What is acceptable? Can you draw that line?
Common sense and decent values go a long way here......
Comment