Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Elder Scrolls V

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elder Scrolls V

    http://www.gamespot.com/news/6284431...es%3Btitle%3B2

    I've been slacking on playing Oblivion, and I have yet to beat it. I'm going to start playing it again and beat so I can get ready for Elder Scrolls 5.

  • #2
    Thank the lord. Elder Scrolls games are so legit. Plus they put all this time into this one...it's gotta be sweet.

    Comment


    • #3
      sweet hope its out soon but i dont know if i love the idea of it being a direct sequel to the last game
      sigpic

      Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by canadiansbronco View Post
        sweet hope its out soon but i dont know if i love the idea of it being a direct sequel to the last game
        Why is that?

        Comment


        • #5
          because i dont see what they could add that we didnt do in Oblivion or what could be the storyline and i would like to see a different setting and stuff....BUT if they find new stuff to add and make it intresting then it could be fun
          sigpic

          Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by canadiansbronco View Post
            because i dont see what they could add that we didnt do in Oblivion or what could be the storyline and i would like to see a different setting and stuff....BUT if they find new stuff to add and make it intresting then it could be fun
            Well they could do a search for a new emperor, factions fighting for power, rebuilding of Kvatch (which I guess had an arena like the Imperial City), and overall rebuilding in a trouble time I guess.

            Comment


            • #7
              Interesting. I didn't have the time to finish Oblivion when I got it... got maybe 20 hours in. I am bad about not going back to games if I get pulled away from them for too long. I may have to read up on the spoilers of the plot before this one comes out.

              Great game though. Love Elder Scrolls.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yeah I read this the other day, great news. I put like 80-100 hours into Oblivion and only like 20 hours of that was even spent on the main story Those games are always so sweet, and I can't wait for this one to come out.

                Comment


                • #9
                  If they actually make it with console (PS3 and 360) gamers in mind this time, it should be a good game. It was fundamentally flawed enough in the last one however as to make it a wash on those systems.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Alastor View Post
                    If they actually make it with console (PS3 and 360) gamers in mind this time, it should be a good game. It was fundamentally flawed enough in the last one however as to make it a wash on those systems.
                    If it is a direct sequel, they basically have to make it on the PS3 and 360 or they'd have horrible sales.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Alastor View Post
                      If they actually make it with console (PS3 and 360) gamers in mind this time, it should be a good game. It was fundamentally flawed enough in the last one however as to make it a wash on those systems.
                      What makes you say that? I played Oblivion on the 360 and enjoyed it a ton. Sure it was better on the PC, but pretty much everything other than sports games are better on PC.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Hoserman117 View Post
                        What makes you say that? I played Oblivion on the 360 and enjoyed it a ton. Sure it was better on the PC, but pretty much everything other than sports games are better on PC.
                        I have it on the 360 as well and love it. Yeah all types of games like those are better on PC, Fallout is an example, it was good on the consoles, but better on PC. FPS are also better on the PC, but just as fun to play on consoles.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Amari24 View Post
                          If it is a direct sequel, they basically have to make it on the PS3 and 360 or they'd have horrible sales.
                          No, it was made on the PC. It was ported to the PS3.

                          There are a great many features that work on a PC that cannot work on a console.

                          Beyond that, there were a lot of bugs, glitches, and other minutia that was easy to fix on a PC, but that it wasn't possible to address on the consoles - and then they stopped patching it.

                          It wasn't made for a console. It was made for a PC and they then copied it over to a console without accounting for the limitations of one.

                          It was a port to a console. It was not created for - or on - a console.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Alastor View Post
                            No, it was made on the PC. It was ported to the PS3.

                            There are a great many features that work on a PC that cannot work on a console.

                            Beyond that, there were a lot of bugs, glitches, and other minutia that was easy to fix on a PC, but that it wasn't possible to address on the consoles - and then they stopped patching it.

                            It wasn't made for a console. It was made for a PC and they then copied it over to a console without accounting for the limitations of one.

                            It was a port to a console. It was not created for - or on - a console.
                            Yeah but what exactly was so bad about it on consoles? Yes there were some bugs and the menu interface was a little slow to get through, but other than that I thought it was a great game. The bugs were fixed pretty early on and the DLC was also incredible.

                            I heard the PS3 version was worse than the PC or 360 version in terms of graphics, but that doesn't mean it wasn't still very enjoyable.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Hoserman117 View Post
                              Yeah but what exactly was so bad about it on consoles? Yes there were some bugs and the menu interface was a little slow to get through, but other than that I thought it was a great game. The bugs were fixed pretty early on and the DLC was also incredible.

                              I heard the PS3 version was worse than the PC or 360 version in terms of graphics, but that doesn't mean it wasn't still very enjoyable.
                              It wasn't about the graphics. While you may have heard that they fixed all the bugs in the PS3 version, they didn't. There were still several pretty significant bugs in the game, some of which were "game killing" bugs.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X