Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CoD Elite

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jcdavey
    replied
    Originally posted by roushmartin6 View Post
    I was planning on both but now might just lean more towards BF3 at first.
    i think getting both is going to be the smart play, and i'll explain why

    i just recently traded in black ops for LA noire straight up via some kind of eb deal

    i mean the game was still giving $40 trade-in value , and via the deal eb had going, they were giving 50% on trade-in value towards new game purchases.

    so while battlefield looks like it will be the winner, buying a psn card to test out the elite features, will be kinda cool and still allow me to trade the game in if it's not good/when i grow bored of it.

    the cod community is like the madden community, it's got a bigger following, and the trade-in value stays around longer.

    in the unlikely event that cod mw3 is actually a better game than bf3 ...then i may be stuck with bf3....

    Leave a comment:


  • roushmartin6
    replied
    Originally posted by jcdavey View Post
    <-----buying both
    I was planning on both but now might just lean more towards BF3 at first.

    Leave a comment:


  • jcdavey
    replied
    also...activision is just the publisher really lol

    Leave a comment:


  • jcdavey
    replied
    Originally posted by roushmartin6 View Post
    Here comes Battlefield 3 to steal those sales now!
    <-----buying both

    Leave a comment:


  • roushmartin6
    replied
    Here comes Battlefield 3 to steal those sales now!

    Leave a comment:


  • InsaneBlaze23
    replied
    Originally posted by Amari24 View Post
    Apparently making $1billion off a rehash just isn't enough for a company like Activision. I'm so glad I've never bought a CoD game in my life, I'd hate to have my money in the hands of a company like that. I was so close to getting MW2 when it came out, good thing I got Assassin's Creed 2 instead.
    Lol, I agree, and regret ever buying CoD 4 and MW2, never bought coD 3, waw, or black ops.

    The only cod game that I bought and loved was CoD2.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amari24
    replied
    Apparently making $1billion off a rehash just isn't enough for a company like Activision. I'm so glad I've never bought a CoD game in my life, I'd hate to have my money in the hands of a company like that. I was so close to getting MW2 when it came out, good thing I got Assassin's Creed 2 instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • jcdavey
    replied
    if it's on the ps3, and there's a small monthly fee, there's no reason for me not to try this out for a month or two as long as i can just buy a psn card and pay for it like that, if the damn psn store is even working by the time this game comes out lol

    Leave a comment:


  • InsaneBlaze23
    replied
    I find this funny, this is what my cousin said when I asked him about it.

    "It's nothing like Bungie.net"

    "It's a good idea"

    "It takes all the little kids out of it"

    "It stops camping"

    "It's the same thing as paying $60, for a game for the same console"

    See I find what he said funny, even funnier is him calling out camping when thats all he does.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon Freeman
    replied
    Originally posted by CoryWinget81 View Post
    If the fee was for dedicated servers I might consider it, but "fixed" matchmaking? Shouldn't it be fixed anyway?
    Seriously. they make you pay for p2p networking...ridiculous

    Leave a comment:


  • InsaneBlaze23
    replied
    Originally posted by CoryWinget81 View Post
    If the fee was for dedicated servers I might consider it, but "fixed" matchmaking? Shouldn't it be fixed anyway?
    Exactly, and if you have to pay for a fixed matchmaking, I wonder what they would do, if they added dedicated servers. They might charge you $20 bucks for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • CoryWinget81
    replied
    Originally posted by sSync View Post
    Yeah dude. It's just sad to see a huge company like Activision using their position to squeeze as much money out of the community as possible instead of funnelling features back in to make the game better for the people who play it. Dedicated servers should've come before a subscription service of any kind.

    If the fee was for dedicated servers I might consider it, but "fixed" matchmaking? Shouldn't it be fixed anyway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sync
    replied
    Yeah dude. It's just sad to see a huge company like Activision using their position to squeeze as much money out of the community as possible instead of funnelling features back in to make the game better for the people who play it. Dedicated servers should've come before a subscription service of any kind.

    Leave a comment:


  • InsaneBlaze23
    replied
    Originally posted by sSync View Post
    Wow. No words.

    I actually didn't care (as long as it's not mandatory, let the tryhards pay more money so they can drool over their stats) until I read that CoD:Elite would entail improved matchmaking. That had better mean "more search restrictions" and not literally "improved" matchmaking because whatever ships with the game should be the best possible code.
    I agree.

    But the worst thing is, in which piss you off. Call of Duty(though I hate it) is the largest game(sells) ever, but yet they feel that they should get more money.

    People are gonna do it, so they wont go "Oh, everyone hates this, lets make it free". No people, allot of people are gonna pay for it, and notice that the matchmaking is actually not different, just a lie to make you think that CoD was fixing it's matchmaking.

    Like it was said before, this is nothing but Bunige.net for a fee.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hoserman117
    replied
    Almost pisses me off as much as that BS games are pulling now where you have to have a pass to play online so you can't buy the games used anymore...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X