If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
Hey, I realize it was one book, but it is 3 different movies.
I thought the second one was the best, personally.
Technically, 'The Lord of the Rings' was 6 books. Typically, they are packaged two 'books' per actual book. And if you throw 'The Hobbit' into the mix you get either 4 or 7 books, depending on your perspective.
Hmm...I think I'm expressing my geekitude now.
"You can't take the sky from me..."
------
"You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding"
Originally posted by Javalon Technically, 'The Lord of the Rings' was 6 books. Typically, they are packaged two 'books' per actual book. And if you throw 'The Hobbit' into the mix you get either 4 or 7 books, depending on your perspective.
Hmm...I think I'm expressing my geekitude now.
Ok, but wasn't that an editorial decision? I am fairly certain that Tolkien intended LOTR to be 1 novel. This is based in a foreword from his son in my copy.
Originally posted by Jared Ok, but wasn't that an editorial decision? I am fairly certain that Tolkien intended LOTR to be 1 novel. This is based in a foreword from his son in my copy.
yea that's right but the publishers refused because they thought people wouldn't read it because it was too daunting. He also got pissed off with the publisher because they changed the name to return of the king in the 3rd book cause it gave away the plot.
Dumb and dumber the original not the gay new one...
forrest gump
chicago
cant think of many more those are the best
Whats a Quarter Back to do with so many choices....Bell....Griffin....Hearst....Smith....W atts and our D rocks!!! Hey Sharpe good luck with CBS
THE PLAGUE IS BACK!
Casablanca
The Maltese Falcon
Any Given Sunday
M*A*S*H
Momento
Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan
Star Trek 6: The Undiscovered Country
Sleeper (Great Woody Allen Movie)
I'll think of more and get back to this later.
Sprite? Good. You mind if I have some of your tasty beverage to wash this down with?
Tweet
Great list, Jared. And Gigli was just icing on the cake!
Comment