If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
Realistically, it made no difference in the play. No advantage was gained by the Broncos due to the "illegal" formation. I hate it when a penalty that didn't affect the outcome of a play negates it. That's something that soccer officiating has gotten right...
If the head of offciating said it was not illegal and a flag should not have been thrown then this thread should be locked up. Only call they should review for this game is the fumble the steelers had in their own territory.
Realistically, it made no difference in the play. No advantage was gained by the Broncos due to the "illegal" formation. I hate it when a penalty that didn't affect the outcome of a play negates it. That's something that soccer officiating has gotten right...
I wish Football would somehow incorporate the "Play the Advantage" rule from Soccer. It would change the game for the better, I think.
However, it would have to go through possible years of growing pains...
Take a look and judge for yourself. He is noticeably further back from the LoS then the rest of the o-line.
I've seen them call ends as lining up illegally as receivers because they were an inch or two too far away from the tackle and therefore split out as a receiver.
It IS nitpicking, but refs have nitpicked plenty in big games, crowding the absolute letter of the rules...
thats the TV angle, look at the line judge at the top of the screen. He was closest to are tight end. If there was an issue the flag would have come out.
Take a look and judge for yourself. He is noticeably further back from the LoS then the rest of the o-line.
I've seen them call ends as lining up illegally as receivers because they were an inch or two too far away from the tackle and therefore split out as a receiver.
It IS nitpicking, but refs have nitpicked plenty in big games, crowding the absolute letter of the rules...
Well let's see, IMO the Steelers were basically handed their Superbowl victory against the Seahawks because of the refs, so...yeah the Steelers had it coming. Ruled a legal formation, is what it is.
It is what it is, made no difference towards the outcome of the game or the execution of the play. The blown call on the lateral due to a whistle definitely impacted the game and went in Pittsburgh's favor big-time. Pittsburgh got away with two blatant facemask against us that were not called that would've been very helpful to us. So I view it as a wash, we won and that's all that matters.
Comment