If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
I'll say it again. If that was DT on that play, there would be a 100+ post thread on how he sucks and can't run routes and will never be trusted by Manning...
It's just one play. Next time Stokely catches that.
Last edited by PhoenixDread; 08-14-2012, 04:23 AM.
The pick at Chicago is an example of why everyone should ask themselves on each play: "Exactly what am I seeing here?"
Exactly.
Tim Tebow's ball in hindsight was nicked at the line and changed the trajectory of the ball. Orton threw to a WR that ran a wrong route and it looked like he just threw it straight to the safety.
People will argue that "hey, picks are picks" just so they don't lose any integrity of their initial argument on turnovers, but sometimes it's not black and white like that.
Tim Tebow's ball in hindsight was nicked at the line and changed the trajectory of the ball. Orton threw to a WR that ran a wrong route and it looked like he just threw it straight to the safety.
People will argue that "hey, picks are picks" just so they don't lose any integrity of their initial argument on turnovers, but sometimes it's not black and white like that.
Unless, as in this case, it is subsequently explained by the coaches or players involved, one may never know why something happened on the field the way it did; that includes Backs fumbling because someone missed a blocking assignment.
As far as figuring out what I'm seeing, it's great if I understand the formation, the D lined up against it and the play being run. Beyond that, I'm not going to jump to conclusions.
Last edited by samparnell; 08-14-2012, 07:43 AM.
Reason: change coordinating conjunction
"Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes." ~ Publilius Syrus
Unless, as in this case, it is subsequently explained by the coaches or players involved, one may never know why something happened on the field the way it did; that includes Backs fumbling because someone missed a blocking assignment.
As far as figuring out what I'm seeing, it's great if I understand the formation, the D lined up against it and the play being run. Beyond that, I'm not going to jump to conclusions.
Then you do not need one of these...........
sigpic Samparnell - Adopted Coach & Mentor
2016 Adopted Bronco - Derek Wolfe
2014 Adopted Bronco - DeMarcus Ware - 2015 Adopted Bronco - Von Miller
Tweet
*** God Bless Our Military Men And Women***
... not
Comment