Let me start by saying I have nothing but the highest respect for your tradition-rich franchise. That said, and having read some of the posts here, this is my two-part question...
What evidence do any of you have that Jake Plummer is really better than the below-average quarterback his numbers proclaim him to be? And that Tom Brady is really worse than the winner HIS numbers proclaim him to be?
The numbers that matter to me: In a far shorter career, Brady has led more 4th-Quarter comebacks (9 to 8), won a Super Bowl ring, and led the league in touchdown passes in his only full season.
Again, I'm not trying to start an iternational incident here, but the consensus seems to be that the Broncos were robbed last night because of Plummer's absence. (To which I point out that the Pats played without their 2 best defensive players in Richard Seymour and Roosevelt Colvin). In truth, what cost the Broncos the game was Shanahan's bizarre abandonment of the running game in the final minutes.
Am interest in your thoughts...
What evidence do any of you have that Jake Plummer is really better than the below-average quarterback his numbers proclaim him to be? And that Tom Brady is really worse than the winner HIS numbers proclaim him to be?
The numbers that matter to me: In a far shorter career, Brady has led more 4th-Quarter comebacks (9 to 8), won a Super Bowl ring, and led the league in touchdown passes in his only full season.
Again, I'm not trying to start an iternational incident here, but the consensus seems to be that the Broncos were robbed last night because of Plummer's absence. (To which I point out that the Pats played without their 2 best defensive players in Richard Seymour and Roosevelt Colvin). In truth, what cost the Broncos the game was Shanahan's bizarre abandonment of the running game in the final minutes.
Am interest in your thoughts...
Comment