Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mike anderson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 56crash
    replied
    Kyle Johnson will win the game for us they are going to try to stop our running game at all cost and that will leave him wide open all day long !!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • sbutk
    replied
    Originally posted by Astrass
    #2 run offense = marginal? are you on drugs? I don't care if they aren't all stars.


    HAHA!!! I loved that response!


    Leave a comment:


  • Astrass
    replied
    Bell is better suited against NE anyways....he's gonna get more carries.

    Leave a comment:


  • londonbronco
    replied
    Originally posted by DAYNETRAYNE
    and MA has struggled much this year with those 3-4 def. And in all honesty Dayne has been pretty effective no mattter what the def is. so i expect to see him in acouple series to, and i'm hoping Bell can break off a big one. That would really keep them on there heels.

    yeah lets hope so bells long overdue a long run, the pats over the last 6 games have been good against the run,only averaging 2.9 yards against the run on each carry.

    lets hope shanny mixes it up with the bootlegs and play action,keep them on there toes,get plenty of pressure on brady,..

    i think we're turn the screw on them...

    Leave a comment:


  • Astrass
    replied
    Originally posted by Ravage!!!
    In the PLAYOFFS? Since when is losing your 1000yrd rusher NOT a big deal in ANY offense. Some seem to think we are "loaded" at RB. We aren't. We have had success with the RBs that we have... MA and Bell. Bell hasn't broken a big one in how long? Dayne has ONE game? MA has rushed for barely 1000 yrds in a time when 1000 yrds isn't exactly considered to be the tops.

    When we have marginal talent at RB... (meaning people that get the job done, but are not considered the top at their position)...and you take the LEADER of that marginal group OUT of the equation, that would be a HUGE loss to our offense.

    #2 run offense = marginal? are you on drugs? I don't care if they aren't all stars.

    Leave a comment:


  • DAYNETRAYNE
    replied
    exactly.....

    Originally posted by londonbronco
    i think dayne will see some action, especially if anderson struggles against that 3-4 defence, we seem to struggle against the 3-4, san diego, dallas etc..

    without a run game, i'd be very concerned, but i think at home we're get the job done...
    and MA has struggled much this year with those 3-4 def. And in all honesty Dayne has been pretty effective no mattter what the def is. so i expect to see him in acouple series to, and i'm hoping Bell can break off a big one. That would really keep them on there heels.

    Leave a comment:


  • londonbronco
    replied
    Originally posted by DAYNETRAYNE
    it wasnt a huge loss in week 2 when it was crunch time and Ma was hampered from the ribs, and Dayne came in and our offense did not miss a beat. Week 1 when we only had 2 rbs dressed and Ma went out on the very first play was a HUGE LOSS. If Ma was out, idont think anybody would be to worried about the running game. They all can get it done. Dayne has done a tremendous job filling in when given the opp. He just needs more caries, so all u guys can stop saying he had i huge came, he's been solid each time called apon.


    i think dayne will see some action, especially if anderson struggles against that 3-4 defence, we seem to struggle against the 3-4, san diego, dallas etc..

    without a run game, i'd be very concerned, but i think at home we're get the job done...

    Leave a comment:


  • DAYNETRAYNE
    replied
    well,

    Originally posted by Ravage!!!
    In the PLAYOFFS? Since when is losing your 1000yrd rusher NOT a big deal in ANY offense. Some seem to think we are "loaded" at RB. We aren't. We have had success with the RBs that we have... MA and Bell. Bell hasn't broken a big one in how long? Dayne has ONE game? MA has rushed for barely 1000 yrds in a time when 1000 yrds isn't exactly considered to be the tops.

    When we have marginal talent at RB... (meaning people that get the job done, but are not considered the top at their position)...and you take the LEADER of that marginal group OUT of the equation, that would be a HUGE loss to our offense.
    it wasnt a huge loss in week 2 when it was crunch time and Ma was hampered from the ribs, and Dayne came in and our offense did not miss a beat. Week 1 when we only had 2 rbs dressed and Ma went out on the very first play was a HUGE LOSS. If Ma was out, idont think anybody would be to worried about the running game. They all can get it done. Dayne has done a tremendous job filling in when given the opp. He just needs more caries, so all u guys can stop saying he had 1 huge came, he's been solid each time called apon.
    Last edited by DAYNETRAYNE; 01-13-2006, 12:56 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ravage!!!
    replied
    Originally posted by Astrass
    huge? no......since when has loosing a RB in our system been huge?
    In the PLAYOFFS? Since when is losing your 1000yrd rusher NOT a big deal in ANY offense. Some seem to think we are "loaded" at RB. We aren't. We have had success with the RBs that we have... MA and Bell. Bell hasn't broken a big one in how long? Dayne has ONE game? MA has rushed for barely 1000 yrds in a time when 1000 yrds isn't exactly considered to be the tops.

    When we have marginal talent at RB... (meaning people that get the job done, but are not considered the top at their position)...and you take the LEADER of that marginal group OUT of the equation, that would be a HUGE loss to our offense.

    Leave a comment:


  • DAYNETRAYNE
    replied
    thank u,

    Originally posted by Astrass
    huge? no......since when has loosing a RB in our system been huge?

    please school him Trass. HUGE. LOsing Ma wouldnt put a dent in our system. The only thing we would miss is his leadership, and he can do that from the sidelines.

    Leave a comment:


  • AZ Snake Fan
    replied
    DENVER BRONCOS

    1/10/06 1/11/06 1/12/06
    POS.
    PLAYER
    INJURY
    TUES.
    WED.
    THURS.

    TE Stephen Alexander Toe P P P
    DE Courtney Brown Knee/Shoulder P P P
    LB Keith Burns Knee P P P
    TE Jeb Putzier Shoulder P P P
    CB Darrent Williams Groin P P P
    LB Al Wilson Hand P P P


    --- no Mike here !


    NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS


    1/10/06 1/11/06 1/12/06
    POS. PLAYER INJURY TUES. WED. THURS.
    QB Tom Brady Right Shoulder P P P
    LB Matt Chatham Knee P* P* P*
    RB Corey Dillon Calf P* P* P*
    RB Heath Evans Shoulder P* P* P*
    TE Christian Fauria Foot P* P* P*
    TE Daniel Graham Shoulder P* P* P*
    DE Jarvis Green Shoulder P* P* P*
    S Artrell Hawkins Thigh P* P* P*
    C Russ Hochstein Ankle P* P* P*
    T Nick Kaczur Shoulder P* P* P*
    C Gene Mruczkowski Back P*
    FB Patrick Pass Hamstring P* P* P*
    CB Asante Samuel Head P* Upgraded to off list

    Leave a comment:


  • AZ Snake Fan
    replied
    --- Where is MA ? ---


    1/12/06

    Patriots, Broncos release injury reports New England Patriots

    The New England Patriots (11-6) and the Denver Broncos (13-3) announce the following player injuries.


    NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS (11-6)
    PLAYER POSITION STATUS INJURY PRACTICE
    Tom Brady QB Probable Right Shoulder
    Matt Chatham LB Probable Knee Missed Portion
    Corey Dillon RB Probable Calf Missed Portion
    Heath Evans FB Probable Shoulder Missed Portion
    Christian Fauria TE Probable Foot Missed Portion
    Daniel Graham TE Probable Shoulder Missed Portion
    Jarvis Green DE Probable Shoulder Missed Portion
    Artrell Hawkins S Probable Thigh Missed Portion
    Russ Hochstein C Probable Ankle Missed Portion
    Nick Kaczur T Probable Shoulder Missed Portion
    Gene Mruczkowski C Probable Back Missed Portion
    Patrick Pass FB Probable Hamstring Missed Portion


    DENVER BRONCOS (13-3)
    PLAYER POSITION STATUS INJURY PRACTICE

    Stephen Alexander TE Probable Toe
    Courtney Brown DE Probable Knee/Shoulder
    Keith Burns LB Probable Knee
    Jeb Putzier TE Probable Shoulder
    Darrent Williams CB Probable Groin
    Al Wilson LB Probable Thumb






    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --- MA is healthy !!! OOOORRRRAAAAHHHH --- Semper Fi !!!! Go Big Mike !!!!
    Last edited by AZ Snake Fan; 01-13-2006, 11:46 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Astrass
    replied
    Originally posted by Ravage!!!
    yes we are. If MA is out.. its a huge blow to our offense.
    huge? no......since when has loosing a RB in our system been huge?

    Leave a comment:


  • ShotPutKing
    replied
    no no no...

    it's just the last update for his injury status. same with darius watts being questionable for thursday...
    from all accounts he's completely healthy and ready for hte game.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ravage!!!
    replied
    Originally posted by DAYNETRAYNE
    no the hell were not. WHat Broncos have u been watchin.
    yes we are. If MA is out.. its a huge blow to our offense.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X