I was expecting to see pryce go, and putzier was on the border but its no big deal. BUT WHY MIKE. I dont think that Bell is ready yet, and I dont want us to drafta rb since we were fine. We could have cut 1 of the browns ands another TE instead of Mike. Anybody have a logical reason besides the $ factor? Also does anybody think that anderson will sign with us as a FA?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Anderson?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lo4f3rI was expecting to see pryce go, and putzier was on the border but its no big deal. BUT WHY MIKE. I dont think that Bell is ready yet, and I dont want us to drafta rb since we were fine. We could have cut 1 of the browns ands another TE instead of Mike. Anybody have a logical reason besides the $ factor? Also does anybody think that anderson will sign with us as a FA?
His name is Ron Dayne!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by lo4f3rDayne. Eh i dont know, i dont see much in him. I think those years in NY killed him, but anything is possible in the Denver backfield
Sig by Snk16, cause he's ****ing awesome like that.
DENVER BRONCOS...WELCOME TO THE CUTLER ERA!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheRodSmith..mike ehh.. WHY!! i ask u WHY!! i feel sad lol i miss mike!!
Comment
-
Shanahan probably has his eye on a TD or CP in the draft... if not then maybe we are planning on signing edge or another big name RB....
or maybe he just cut MA and told him that we will sign him once free agency starts... my reasoning for this is that we did not have enough time between when we found out that the CBA deal would not be reached and free agency to restructure MA's contract.
Comment
-
WTF???
I may be showing my football ignorance, but I don't care, I'm gonna say it anyway:
Why on Earth did we cut Mike?
...There had better be something big up somebody's sleeve in the front office.
sigpic
They're your teammates, now.
Best of luck, TT!
...Always a class act - in any uniform.
sbutk: i can see why Denver is taking TO's right now [trailing by 7, with 30 seconds left in the half]. but why Oakland???
Captain Lori: You are trying to figure out the Raiders. Try figuring out women instead; it's probably much easier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigplayshay84Shanahan probably has his eye on a TD or CP in the draft... if not then maybe we are planning on signing edge or another big name RB....
or maybe he just cut MA and told him that we will sign him once free agency starts... my reasoning for this is that we did not have enough time between when we found out that the CBA deal would not be reached and free agency to restructure MA's contract.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sbutkWTF???
I may be showing my football ignorance, but I don't care, I'm gonna say it anyway:
Why on Earth did we cut Mike?
...There had better be something big up somebody's sleeve in the front office.
To address your question though, he was cut because he's 33, he had the biggest cap number of the rb's, and he's easily replaceable. Sure, he was a fan fav and the guys liked him, but just wait til the next guy comes along...
Comment
-
Originally posted by WABroncoDayne (or a day one rook) will match MA's production...no sweat.
Um, not to say it won't happen ...but I'll believe it when I see it (and I hope I do).sigpic
They're your teammates, now.
Best of luck, TT!
...Always a class act - in any uniform.
sbutk: i can see why Denver is taking TO's right now [trailing by 7, with 30 seconds left in the half]. but why Oakland???
Captain Lori: You are trying to figure out the Raiders. Try figuring out women instead; it's probably much easier.
Comment
-
Why is everyone acting like MA was some big time RB? Put Dayne in his shoes this season and he does just as good as MA.
Dayne will either be our main RB or Shanahan will draft a stud that can possibly step in right away (very possible).
I like MA, but I wasn't shocked at all that they cut him. I thought his days in Denver where coming to an end anyways.sigpic
Comment
Comment