Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who gets credit for Jake's turnaround?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AlWilsonizKING
    replied
    Right Here!!!!




    PEACE!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • topscribe
    replied
    Originally posted by BroncoSexyDaddy
    Already Forgotton,lets just move on to the next game Top
    You move to the next game in some other thread.

    This thread has been about this game.

    Or didn't you notice?

    -----
    Last edited by topscribe; 11-08-2006, 12:27 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroncoSexyDaddy
    replied
    It seems to me that OT Pears has been making a big difference in Jake getting more time to throw.Could Pears be the key to the Offense gettin back on track?Or is it Javon Walker and Pears

    Leave a comment:


  • BroncoSexyDaddy
    replied
    Originally posted by topscribe
    Why wouldn't I be ready for that? Whenever I or any other objective poster has
    tried to analyze a loss on a team concept, you Jake-bashers have been ready to
    jump right up and accuse us of making excuses for Jake. There has been a number
    of us who have been willing to admit Jake had his part in it, but no, you dear
    fellows have had to insist it was allllllllll Jake.

    Now, you are saying we, or I, am giving only Jake the credit for this win, because I
    want to give him any credit at all. I saw Champ's two interceptions, the four sacks,
    Lynch's hits, D-Will's fumble recoveries, Javon's three TDs, including his incredible
    72-yard TD run.

    I also saw Jake's 16-27 for 227 yds, 3 TDs, and 123.5 QB rating. But then, you'd
    like to forget that part, wouldn't you?

    -----
    Already Forgotton,lets just move on to the next game Top
    Last edited by BroncoSexyDaddy; 11-07-2006, 11:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LordTrychon
    replied
    Originally posted by MileHighStud


    Ok but I am sure I have seen post in anti SNAKE threads calling those who support him idiots as well.
    When you see a post like that, hit the report post button so that the Mods are sure to see it.

    Leave a comment:


  • cinnamunmun
    replied
    Originally posted by MileHighStud


    Ok but I am sure I have seen post in anti SNAKE threads calling those who support him idiots as well.
    Honestly, just stop. There are PLENTY of both sides that were deleted.

    Leave a comment:


  • cinnamunmun
    replied
    Originally posted by LordTrychon
    It's because you have massive split personality disorder.

    I don't see what's so hard to understand, personally... don't be derogatory towards other members.
    I think its pretty simple, but everyone always wants to play the victim.

    Leave a comment:


  • MileHighStud
    replied
    Originally posted by Jared
    It's not the criticism or praise that is the issue.

    It's the posts that make snide remarks, call others names, or categrocially lump all posters into two camps in a negative fashion that are the issue.


    Therefore when a person starts a thread that backs Plummer, and uses terms like "ALl you anti-plummers are idiots", then it has to go.

    Just because a thread 'throws Plummer under the bus', as you put it, that is not reason enough to delete it. It has to devolve into personall attacks, or a polarizing thread where some key unacceptable phrases are used.





    EDIT: I find it odd that persons who support Plummer and those who don't both seem to think I am favoring the opposing viewpoint.


    Ok but I am sure I have seen post in anti SNAKE threads calling those who support him idiots as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • LordTrychon
    replied
    Originally posted by Jared
    It's not the criticism or praise that is the issue.

    It's the posts that make snide remarks, call others names, or categrocially lump all posters into two camps in a negative fashion that are the issue.


    Therefore when a person starts a thread that backs Plummer, and uses terms like "ALl you anti-plummers are idiots", then it has to go.

    Just because a thread 'throws Plummer under the bus', as you put it, that is not reason enough to delete it. It has to devolve into personall attacks, or a polarizing thread where some key unacceptable phrases are used.





    EDIT: I find it odd that persons who support Plummer and those who don't both seem to think I am favoring the opposing viewpoint.

    It's because you have massive split personality disorder.

    I don't see what's so hard to understand, personally... don't be derogatory towards other members.

    Leave a comment:


  • cadencesdad
    replied
    Originally posted by bleedbluorange
    Suppose Jake keeps playing well. Who gets the credit?
    The critics who have pounded :hammer: Jake every day.

    Or those that love Jake and defended his every mistake.

    This is for fun, nothing more.

    I say that Jake heard all the complaints and had to tighten up. Thank you MTN MAN you may have saved the season. LOL

    Um......Jake Plummer???

    Leave a comment:


  • Jared
    replied
    Originally posted by MileHighStud
    Hey well threads that throw the SNAKE under the bus are very much alive around here. Why dont you get rid of those as well?!

    It's not the criticism or praise that is the issue.

    It's the posts that make snide remarks, call others names, or categrocially lump all posters into two camps in a negative fashion that are the issue.


    Therefore when a person starts a thread that backs Plummer, and uses terms like "ALl you anti-plummers are idiots", then it has to go.

    Just because a thread 'throws Plummer under the bus', as you put it, that is not reason enough to delete it. It has to devolve into personall attacks, or a polarizing thread where some key unacceptable phrases are used.





    EDIT: I find it odd that persons who support Plummer and those who don't both seem to think I am favoring the opposing viewpoint.

    Leave a comment:


  • MileHighStud
    replied
    Originally posted by Jared
    I actually deleted a thread that was very pro=plummer just three days ago because the thread starter was very condescending and doing that "Anti Plummer people suck" thing.


    You assertation is incorrect.
    Hey well threads that throw the SNAKE under the bus are very much alive around here. Why dont you get rid of those as well?!

    Leave a comment:


  • MileHighStud
    replied
    Originally posted by bleedbluorange
    Suppose Jake keeps playing well. Who gets the credit?
    The critics who have pounded :hammer: Jake every day.

    Or those that love Jake and defended his every mistake.

    This is for fun, nothing more.

    I say that Jake heard all the complaints and had to tighten up. Thank you MTN MAN you may have saved the season. LOL


    I say you say nothing!!

    Leave a comment:


  • broncos_mtnman
    replied
    Originally posted by arapaho
    this is beginning to be a joke of a board ....thanks for the freedom to talk
    Here's a CP from me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lorcust
    replied
    Originally posted by arapaho
    your off base ...i gave credit where i thought it was warrented...jake included

    but we are called bashers,,,haters and second class fans because of our opinions...right...we all are lumped together.......but i stand pat...i can look back at every bad game and see where the ......what.....ahhh real fans who never blame jake? have blamed his struggles on everyone but jake.....now when he has a cgood game its because jake played better....my point is if the reason jake was struggling was because of the other players then by rights when ..i guess they suddenly all came together and played well ...the credit for jakes turnaround should go to these players ..and not jake because he's played good all along
    I'm not lumping you together, certain individuals are. It's those certain individuals who should get your scorn, not "pro-Jakes" who haven't even commented on the issue of how much of a fan you are or aren't (like me). I'm seeing the same things now as I did when Jake sucked, just reversed. Jake sucked, but Devoe mistimed a jump. Jake ruled, but Javon was an animal and a beast. Jake sucked, but Javon was dropping passes. Jake ruled, and Tatum Bell really opened up the running game. Jake sucked, and the offensive line was letting guys in on him all day. Jake ruled, and the O-line kept him on his feet. It's small cases few and far between that you are referring to, and grossly exaggerating as the popular, dominant opinion.

    and as for your insinuateing that my post is calleing for trouble...deal with it...i have seen a lot of pro jaksters bashing our beliefs with the same type of posts yet i fail to see where you stepped in to save the day on our behalf....in fact the only threads closed are those with the anti jake (is that the correct term) team and not vice versa
    I feel to see where any one of the bigger Jake detractors who do show a tendancy to bash Jake complain about the Jake bash threads, but don't complain about "I told you so" threads about Jake doing good. Those individuals also don't do the same when the situations are reversed. What's your point? You aren't going to be complaining about any Jake-bashing threads, or have a problem with many, but I've seen you and other people who do show a tendency to bash Jake turn a blind eye to "I told you so" threads about Jake failing. It works both ways. If it suits your perspective, you won't have a problem with it. If it doesn't, you'll go in and talk about it, complain about it even.

    So you think just because "pro-Jakes" bash your beliefs, you think it's right to do the same. That it justifies it? Juvenile reasoning at best. If Timmy Thompson is smoking, does it justify me to? If Jake is kicking someone's car, does it justify me to? No it doesn't. Be better than those who bash your beliefs. Don't go to their level if that's how they respond to you. You'd find there'd be less name-calling at you and bashing your beliefs, if you try to act civil to them. Believe me, I've tried it. It works. Even if they start tossing out labels, avoid it, work around it, and it will stop. Responding it is only allowing it to continue and both sides of this debate are going to do it and keep doing it until people stop and try to put a stop to it. You can only do what you want to do, of course.

    Sorry for the long wait, the cable got knocked out in my area.

    I'd be mad about missing MNF, then again, it's the RAIDERS. I'm not missing much.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X