I am generally not a "FIRE ________" guy, but I don't see the point in continuing with a head coach that does not have an understanding of timeouts and clock management that any decent high school coach has. Hopefully next year we will be in contention and close losses because of coaching stupidity will matter. It's one thing to be aggressive or make a gut call that maybe doesn't work out, but Vic has shown utter cluelessness in timeouts, managing leads, end of half, etc. Time to move on. Great win though!!!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How do you throw it there?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ltsft View PostI am generally not a "FIRE ________" guy, but I don't see the point in continuing with a head coach that does not have an understanding of timeouts and clock management that any decent high school coach has. Hopefully next year we will be in contention and close losses because of coaching stupidity will matter. It's one thing to be aggressive or make a gut call that maybe doesn't work out, but Vic has shown utter cluelessness in timeouts, managing leads, end of half, etc. Time to move on. Great win though!!!!"Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes." ~ Publilius Syrus
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Megalodon30 View PostYou know how you end up like the Cleveland Browns? By firing your coach every year. Be patient.
We just won. I think Aaron Rodgers put it best, R-E-L-A-X.
Throwing on first down with 3+ minutes left yesterday is what the title refers to for those who seem confused. (Terrible decision even if not intercepted)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ltsft View Post
I totally agree with this in general, but my point is how do you win over time in the NFL with a coach who doesn't understand timeouts and clock management basics? So many games in this league are so close. Nothing wrong with being a great coordinator i.e. Wade, sometimes it just doesn't translate to gameday management. Vic has blown it several times over the last couple years. It would be different if it were improving.
Throwing on first down with 3+ minutes left yesterday is what the title refers to for those who seem confused. (Terrible decision even if not intercepted)
At that point in the game it was 18-3 Denver. Had they gone on to score on that drive, well, that could have been a difference maker with how we seem to finish games. Pretty easy call that Belichick did not make.
No coach is perfect and having a head coaching carousel is the last thing this team needs right now.
- 5 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ltsft View PostI am generally not a "FIRE ________" guy, but I don't see the point in continuing with a head coach that does not have an understanding of timeouts and clock management that any decent high school coach has. Hopefully next year we will be in contention and close losses because of coaching stupidity will matter. It's one thing to be aggressive or make a gut call that maybe doesn't work out, but Vic has shown utter cluelessness in timeouts, managing leads, end of half, etc. Time to move on. Great win though!!!!
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ltsft View Post
I totally agree with this in general, but my point is how do you win over time in the NFL with a coach who doesn't understand timeouts and clock management basics? So many games in this league are so close. Nothing wrong with being a great coordinator i.e. Wade, sometimes it just doesn't translate to gameday management. Vic has blown it several times over the last couple years. It would be different if it were improving.
Throwing on first down with 3+ minutes left yesterday is what the title refers to for those who seem confused. (Terrible decision even if not intercepted)
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ltsft View PostI am generally not a "FIRE ________" guy, but I don't see the point in continuing with a head coach that does not have an understanding of timeouts and clock management that any decent high school coach has. Hopefully next year we will be in contention and close losses because of coaching stupidity will matter. It's one thing to be aggressive or make a gut call that maybe doesn't work out, but Vic has shown utter cluelessness in timeouts, managing leads, end of half, etc. Time to move on. Great win though!!!!
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ltsft View Post
I totally agree with this in general, but my point is how do you win over time in the NFL with a coach who doesn't understand timeouts and clock management basics? So many games in this league are so close. Nothing wrong with being a great coordinator i.e. Wade, sometimes it just doesn't translate to gameday management. Vic has blown it several times over the last couple years. It would be different if it were improving.
Throwing on first down with 3+ minutes left yesterday is what the title refers to for those who seem confused. (Terrible decision even if not intercepted)
We have a young gunslinger as a QB. His game is risk it all. It will be our OC's job to reign that in. This is the NFL. Sometimes the quick passes and Intermediate throws are the way to go.
The thing you should be talking about is why Hamilton is getting targets on critical 3rd downs. He is playing some atrocious football.
Comment
-
You know how you also end up like the Cleveland Browns?
By constantly hiring bad head coaches....a trend which were in at the moment.
I have no idea what this team saw in Fangio that made them feel like he was head coaching material but I never saw it.... still don't. And Shurmur? This is what I expected our offense to look like when they hired him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sra84 View PostYou know how you also end up like the Cleveland Browns?
By constantly hiring bad head coaches....a trend which were in at the moment.
I have no idea what this team saw in Fangio that made them feel like he was head coaching material but I never saw it.... still don't. And Shurmur? This is what I expected our offense to look like when they hired him.
Fangio coached a good game yesterday. His defense was excellent, he made zero errors as a head coach, what is your axe to grind with him yesterday? And before you say the passes keep in mind: 1. He doesn't call offensive plays 2. He didn't tell the QB to try and throw it deep.
- 4 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Butler By'Note View Post
Denver is 2-3 and lost to two 5-0 teams by a combined 7 points. The only game they clearly were not in was the one game Driskell started. No matter how you feel about Fangio the team clearly seems to like him since they're playing hard for him and have won the last two games for him.
Fangio coached a good game yesterday. His defense was excellent, he made zero errors as a head coach, what is your axe to grind with him yesterday? And before you say the passes keep in mind: 1. He doesn't call offensive plays 2. He didn't tell the QB to try and throw it deep."Stultum est timere quod vitare non potes." ~ Publilius Syrus
- 2 likes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Butler By'Note View Post
This Head Coach does not call the offensive plays. But with the Patriots selling out to stop the run and Denver losing yardage several run plays in a row, I don't have a problem with them calling the pass play. I have more of a problem with the QB trying to go deep both times, rather than taking something more high percentage.
Adopt-A-Bronco: Kendell Hinton
Comment
-
Originally posted by Butler By'Note View Post
Denver is 2-3 and lost to two 5-0 teams by a combined 7 points. The only game they clearly were not in was the one game Driskell started. No matter how you feel about Fangio the team clearly seems to like him since they're playing hard for him and have won the last two games for him.
Fangio coached a good game yesterday. His defense was excellent, he made zero errors as a head coach, what is your axe to grind with him yesterday? And before you say the passes keep in mind: 1. He doesn't call offensive plays 2. He didn't tell the QB to try and throw it deep.
Comment
Comment