Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

You people lied to me

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peanut
    replied
    Thread needs cleaning. Will do it later.

    Leave a comment:


  • Megalodon30
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post

    Why does it have be "aside" ? Pony up and get it done! We have the cap space and draft capital to make any trade
    And if we can’t get a deal done? Why is Lock getting a legit shot with a coach that wants him such a nightmare scenario?

    Leave a comment:


  • broncojuan
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post

    I never said this year was his fault, this year was Fangios fault. I don't want to waste another year evaluating. Not with the other teams we have to compete with. I want Wilson or Watson or Rodgers
    I would love that, but I think that's just theater to keep the fans invested.

    Leave a comment:


  • roushmartin6
    replied
    Originally posted by Fantaztic7 View Post

    Plus the DB in the middle reading Lock’s eyes ready to drive on the throw. It wasn’t 5 seconds from the snap, more like 3.
    Exactly, if that throw is just lobbed up it's 6 the other way in this scenario

    Leave a comment:


  • Fantaztic7
    replied
    Originally posted by roushmartin6 View Post

    He has to wait for Hinton to finish doing his dig to be able to hit Sutton, you can see he's about to let it rip and gets hit
    Plus the DB in the middle reading Lock’s eyes ready to drive on the throw. It wasn’t 5 seconds from the snap, more like 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • JvDub95
    replied
    Originally posted by Megalodon30 View Post

    Aside from Rodgers, Wilson, or Watson, who are we getting that’s definitely better than Lock? If you believe Lock is so replaceable, who are you getting that doesn’t cost another “post-Manning” scenario we’re currently in when a hypothetical Rodgers retires in Denver?
    Why does it have be "aside" ? Pony up and get it done! We have the cap space and draft capital to make any trade

    Leave a comment:


  • roushmartin6
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post
    We're in a division with Mahomes, Herbert and Carr....and some of you want to continue with Lock, sure makes sense
    If it's not Rodgers, Wilson or Watson it's not better than Lock. This year's qb class is weak and no better than Drew. We've tried the washed vet thing for years now and it's not working. Even Rodgers us a rental. He's getting up there in age so it would be another Peyton Manning scenario

    Leave a comment:


  • Megalodon30
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post
    We're in a division with Mahomes, Herbert and Carr....and some of you want to continue with Lock, sure makes sense
    Aside from Rodgers, Wilson, or Watson, who are we getting that’s definitely better than Lock? If you believe Lock is so replaceable, who are you getting that doesn’t cost another “post-Manning” scenario we’re currently in when a hypothetical Rodgers retires in Denver?

    Leave a comment:


  • JvDub95
    replied
    Originally posted by broncojuan View Post

    I don't know. I've said he should have been given this year (year three is the year most QB makes their greatest strides), and to act like this year is his fault is nonsense. At this point I think if he starts next year it's because we draft a QB in the 1st round, and, best case scenario, he plays so well we might have to decide whether or not to franchise him next year (unlikely). He has been completely mismanaged. It's not his fault, and it's not the fans fault.
    I never said this year was his fault, this year was Fangios fault. I don't want to waste another year evaluating. Not with the other teams we have to compete with. I want Wilson or Watson or Rodgers

    Leave a comment:


  • JvDub95
    replied
    We're in a division with Mahomes, Herbert and Carr....and some of you want to continue with Lock, sure makes sense

    Leave a comment:


  • broncojuan
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post
    Watch Sutton left side....almost 5 seconds from snap to sack
    3 seconds, tops.

    Leave a comment:


  • roushmartin6
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post
    Watch Sutton left side....almost 5 seconds from snap to sack
    He has to wait for Hinton to finish doing his dig to be able to hit Sutton, you can see he's about to let it rip and gets hit

    Leave a comment:


  • broncojuan
    replied
    Originally posted by JvDub95 View Post

    And entering his 4th year? How many more years is he going to be allowed?

    I was in the group that thought he should have been our starter this year so we can have that final evaluation year. I don't want to give him that next year, sorry. I don't want to watch bad football anymore!!! We are looking at yet another top 10 draft pick.....what's the common factor? IDK, maybe bad QB play has something to do with it??
    I don't know. I've said he should have been given this year (year three is the year most QB makes their greatest strides), and to act like this year is his fault is nonsense. At this point I think if he starts next year it's because we draft a QB in the 1st round, and, best case scenario, he plays so well we might have to decide whether or not to franchise him next year (unlikely). He has been completely mismanaged. It's not his fault, and it's not the fans fault.

    Leave a comment:


  • Megalodon30
    replied
    Originally posted by Ear2dastreets View Post

    So we are Keeping him bc offffffffff???,
    I highly doubt a new HC will say we have yo keep him.
    He’s on his rookie deal with one year left. We won’t find a better QB that’s cheaper than Lock. If Paton decides to move Lock, he won’t be here, but more than likely he’s on the roster next year, and there’s a very good chance he’ll be starting if he is on the roster.

    Leave a comment:


  • JvDub95
    replied
    Watch Sutton left side....almost 5 seconds from snap to sack

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X