Originally posted by Fantaztic7
View Post
2-4 his last 5 years in indy. you don't get to ignore his injured season played or not if you are not going to ignore Wilson's injured seasons played or not.
Also given Manning did not play in 2011 the year before Denver got him they make him a bigger gamble than Wilson. Given it was over a year since he played and Wilson showed when healthy in the last 2 games she still had it.
In fact in the end your whole argument is wrong as we know it takes a team to win, and the better the players on that team the better the chances and Wilson is far better than what you had,
And despite being injured and missing 3 games, playing injured for several more Wilson was still top 5 in passer rating and top 10 in tds. and again his last 2 games were he was completely healthy he was
122 passer, 7 tds 1int, 65% complt. in case you are wondering those are elite numbers.
Prior to the injury he was
9 tds, 0 ints, 122 passer rating, 75% complt again Elite numbers.
And his final numbers
26 tds(missed 3 games) 65% complt, 103 passer rating all elite.
Meanwhile, the year before Denver got Manning he had well nothing no one he knew if he could play.
You whole playoffs thing is irrelevant as first you must get there and 2nd that was with Seattle. Last I checked Denver is a different team with different strengths and weaknesses so it is not apples to apples.
once again takes more than just a Qb to win so saying anyone player won or lost is stupid and shows a severe lack of football knowledge.
Let's go another way do you blame Manning for losing to Seattle in the SB? Was it all his fault to you? DO you blame Brady for losing in the playoffs game last year? do you blame Rodgers? Mahomes?
What about manning first year 1 and done was that Manning's fault?
OR year 2 2-1 was that loss Mannings? or year 3 1 and done was that Mannings fault?
All those years when Elway could not get to the Sb was that all his fault?
Football is a team sport and yet you seem to only want to blame the QB, well actually you only want to blame Wilson.
Oh and since you also like the whole trend thing there is also another thing called an anomaly
something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.
Given Wilson wins 56% of his playoff games what you call a trend can be called an anomaly. Given your subset is only 6 games while the subset of the anomaly is 16 games that give more credit to the anomaly not the trend.
So I am going to help you again you got to get in the playoffs to have a chance. Wilson has gotten in 80% of the time and wins 56% of the time which is better than Rodgers.
Comment