tatums stats above, mike below
(im looking at the running stats. No fumbles, no catches, just the ground)
STL- 15 att for 103 yards..6.9 average
- 10 att for 58 yards..5.8 average..1 td
KC- 16 att for 69 yards..4.3 average
- 13 att for 44 yards..3.4 average
NE- 27 att for 123 yards...4.6 average
- 4 att for 12 yards..3.0 average
BAL- 19 att for 92 yards..4.8 average
- 0 att for 0 yards
OAK- 23 att for 83 yards..3.6 average..1 td
- 1 att for 2 yard..2.0 average
CLE- 24 att for 115 yards..4.8 average..1 td
- 10 att for 25 yards..2.5 average
INDY- 12 att for 27 yards..2.1 average
- 15 att for 136 yards..9.1 average..2 tds
PIT- did not play
- 17 att for 28 yards..1.6 average*
OAK- 14 att for 27 yards..2.6 average
- did not play
SAN- did not play
- 20 att for 90 yards..4.5 average..2 tds*
KC- did not play
- 10 att for 28 yards..2.8 average*
SEA- 23 att for 133 yards..5.8 average
- 4 att for 12 yards..3.0 average
SAN- 17 att for 116 yards..6.8 average
- 10 att for 46 yards..4.6 average
AZ- 18 att for 29 yards..1.6 average
- 16 att for 61 yards..3.8 average..2 tds
CIN- 12 att for 50 yards..4.2 average
- 16 att for 69 yards..4.3 average..1 td
SF- 12 att for 48 yards..4.0 average
- 11 att for 66 yards..6.0 average
*- notes started
if you look at the 3 games that mike did start, he didnt do well. One game against San Diego, but other than that, hes better as a backup. When Tatum was bad, most of the time he picked up the slack. Because thats what a BACKUP is supposed to do. And if you look at it, Mike was very inconsistent. He was either good or bad, to really good, and to really bad. Tatum had his bad games to, but im just saying, Mike isnt as good as everyone hypes him to be. Tatum I think was way more consistent, he had alot more games that he did better, and thats what a starter is expected to have and do.(even though that indy game was rather good for mike).
(im looking at the running stats. No fumbles, no catches, just the ground)
STL- 15 att for 103 yards..6.9 average
- 10 att for 58 yards..5.8 average..1 td
KC- 16 att for 69 yards..4.3 average
- 13 att for 44 yards..3.4 average
NE- 27 att for 123 yards...4.6 average
- 4 att for 12 yards..3.0 average
BAL- 19 att for 92 yards..4.8 average
- 0 att for 0 yards
OAK- 23 att for 83 yards..3.6 average..1 td
- 1 att for 2 yard..2.0 average
CLE- 24 att for 115 yards..4.8 average..1 td
- 10 att for 25 yards..2.5 average
INDY- 12 att for 27 yards..2.1 average
- 15 att for 136 yards..9.1 average..2 tds
PIT- did not play
- 17 att for 28 yards..1.6 average*
OAK- 14 att for 27 yards..2.6 average
- did not play
SAN- did not play
- 20 att for 90 yards..4.5 average..2 tds*
KC- did not play
- 10 att for 28 yards..2.8 average*
SEA- 23 att for 133 yards..5.8 average
- 4 att for 12 yards..3.0 average
SAN- 17 att for 116 yards..6.8 average
- 10 att for 46 yards..4.6 average
AZ- 18 att for 29 yards..1.6 average
- 16 att for 61 yards..3.8 average..2 tds
CIN- 12 att for 50 yards..4.2 average
- 16 att for 69 yards..4.3 average..1 td
SF- 12 att for 48 yards..4.0 average
- 11 att for 66 yards..6.0 average
*- notes started
if you look at the 3 games that mike did start, he didnt do well. One game against San Diego, but other than that, hes better as a backup. When Tatum was bad, most of the time he picked up the slack. Because thats what a BACKUP is supposed to do. And if you look at it, Mike was very inconsistent. He was either good or bad, to really good, and to really bad. Tatum had his bad games to, but im just saying, Mike isnt as good as everyone hypes him to be. Tatum I think was way more consistent, he had alot more games that he did better, and thats what a starter is expected to have and do.(even though that indy game was rather good for mike).
Comment