I disagree with the late 1st rounders being second round talent
I think people forget that this draft is a very deep draft with lots of talent in it, and there is a difference in talent levels in the mid 20's to the second round. I mean the Broncos have struck gold late in the 1st round with Al Wilson and Trevor Pryce while also being really burned when they reached for need positions(Marcus Nash & Willie Middlebrooks). But as far as this draft there is certain 1st round talent at DL to be had in the 20's. Plus if these DL are rising up in the draft then you have to look at who is falling. In that group would be Marshawn Lynch, Dwayne Jarrett, Ted Ginn Jr., Levi Brown, Reggie Nelson, Lawrence Timmons. All of these players would hold value for other teams if we are not interested, thus maybe giving us picks in next years draft when a player like Darren McFadden will come out. There is no bad situation that comes with owning 2 picks in the 1st round.
Also I disagree with the posters that think Tank Tyler will be available in the second round because I believe starting with the Jets at no. 25 any one of the teams remaining in the 1st round could take him. Now that does not mean he couldn't slip into the 2nd round, but it would not be far enough for us to get him. So the question really becomes is Tank Tyler, a run stuffing DT who would fit Jim Bates scheme, worth giving up Jake Plummer and the 70th overall selection(3rd round) for? In my mind yes he is because he fills a huge need for us that we cannot find in the FA market and costs us a 3rd round pick and a player who has no future here for us.
Originally posted by DURANGO BRONCO
Also I disagree with the posters that think Tank Tyler will be available in the second round because I believe starting with the Jets at no. 25 any one of the teams remaining in the 1st round could take him. Now that does not mean he couldn't slip into the 2nd round, but it would not be far enough for us to get him. So the question really becomes is Tank Tyler, a run stuffing DT who would fit Jim Bates scheme, worth giving up Jake Plummer and the 70th overall selection(3rd round) for? In my mind yes he is because he fills a huge need for us that we cannot find in the FA market and costs us a 3rd round pick and a player who has no future here for us.
Comment