What would help our D out more if we could not have both? A starting DE or DT.

[redsandcowboy]

Alot of mocks have us taking a DE and not a DT. I think that a DT would make our DEs alot better. Just adding a DE would mean that they could still be Double teamed and not be an more effective than what we already have.

[JoRo]

Alot of mocks have us taking a DE and not a DT. I think that a DT would make our DEs alot better. Just adding a DE would mean that they could still be Double teamed and not be an more effective than what we already have.

I think we will be trying our darndest to land both..... honestly whatever best talent that fits our scheme is left when we decide to pick is how we are going to roll I am sure....

I think many people will be surprised by our first round pick.... possibly me included... hoping it is Staley... many wont be happy simply cuz he isn't a linemen.... but when Cuter doesn't hafta worry bout blindside pressure for 10 years they will look back an say wow what a great pick

sorry got off topic... I think DT is the more pressing need though we need a DE badly too

[BroncFanIN]

I think we will be trying our darndest to land both..... honestly whatever best talent that fits our scheme is left when we decide to pick is how we are going to roll I am sure....

I think many people will be surprised by our first round pick.... possibly me included... hoping it is Staley... many wont be happy simply cuz he isn't a linemen.... but when Cuter doesn't hafta worry bout blindside pressure for 10 years they will look back an say wow what a great pick

sorry got off topic... I think DT is the more pressing need though we need a DE badly too

I hope we do land both. Our front four last year was decent (most of the time) at the run...but the scheme was different last year than it will be this year. I'd love to see us pick someone up that is a sack specialist, with perhaps a steal in the later round with a DT.

I have no idea of names, since I dont follow college football.

But I do know one thing..these boards went nuts last year then we moved up and Cutler was picked. I really hope folks can be more civil this year.

[DTownNative]

Alot of mocks have us taking a DE and not a DT. I think that a DT would make our DEs alot better. Just adding a DE would mean that they could still be Double teamed and not be an more effective than what we already have.

I say DE in the first - bigger impact than a DT, and then a big DT in the 3rd... unless Alan Branch falls to 21...highly unlikely.

S in the 2nd...

[redsandcowboy]

:offtopic: :offtopic: Ok sorry if I did not post it clear enough this is not a lets draft so and so thread. I would like to here opinions if WE ONLY DRAFT OR TRADE FOR 1 DL, would a DT or DE make more of an impa :hammer: ct for our Def.