Originally posted by silkamilkamonic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Based on camp performance, who should/shouldn't be cut?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jhns View PostAlexander is not getting cut so it really doesn't matter. The coaching staff that has put him at #1 last year and 2 the years before does not agree with you guys. It is good to have one that can receive, but that is all just bonus. If they can't block, they are just a receiver. Alexander is one of the better blocking TE's in the game and has done real well for us. The TE position was is there to help the line out, not to be a big receiving threat. Alexander can catch well enough anyways. He was brought into this league as a receiving TE and he has gotten some catches every year.
They do not have to be Gates to be considered a good TE. People are just obsessed with stats, and the blocking stats are not as pretty. That is the only reason people are paying so much attention to the receiving TE's over the blocking ones. Any coach will tell you that it is far more important for them to block well though. I have seen it a lot on this team. We have had multiple TE's (Jackson for 1) that have been pretty good receivers and bad blockers, and guess what, they didn't play. The ones that are good blockers but bad receivers, you guessed it, still played. I think that pretty much proves the point. Just look at the last 3 years of our TE situation.
Edit: BTW, I am not saying anything about Jackson because I haven't watched him, I am just saying that receiving is not even a portion of a TE's job. That is not what you should be judging them on when saying if they are good or not. I am only saying that Alexander is very valuable to this team and isn't getting cut. Just wanted to clear this up so people don't think I am hating on Jackson.
Well, no, receiving IS a portion of a TE's job. Otherwise, they would just be linemen, and small, weak linemen at that. A TE who is effective as a receiver has qualities that WRs typically do not, such as size and strength for blocking out defenders.
Nobody here is saying that blocking ISN'T a part of a TE's job...but to say that receiving is way down the list of TE responsibilities is flat out wrong. Need proof? Look at all the "receiving" TEs in the league...don't see coaches cutting them, do you? Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, Dallas Clark, Todd Heap...the list keeps going. They seem to be doing alright."In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." -Yogi Berra
"All models are wrong, but some are useful."
Comment
-
Originally posted by CSU_stat View PostWell, no, receiving IS a portion of a TE's job. Otherwise, they would just be linemen, and small, weak linemen at that. A TE who is effective as a receiver has qualities that WRs typically do not, such as size and strength for blocking out defenders.
Nobody here is saying that blocking ISN'T a part of a TE's job...but to say that receiving is way down the list of TE responsibilities is flat out wrong. Need proof? Look at all the "receiving" TEs in the league...don't see coaches cutting them, do you? Tony Gonzalez, Antonio Gates, Dallas Clark, Todd Heap...the list keeps going. They seem to be doing alright.
Seriously, look at all the teams in the league and especially before these past few seasons. Why is it that 80% of the TE's on rosters don't go out and catch balls?Last edited by jhns; 08-10-2007, 12:24 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronco_Rob View PostI believe that Jeff Shoate is the answer for a 5th corner...we only have 4 standouts right now and Paymah is more special teams than anything. Curome Cox could play corner if we absolutely needed him to by why do that when Jeff Shoate is here...John 11: 25-27
My Adopt-A-Bronco is D.J. Williams
Thanks Snk16
Comment
-
Originally posted by jhns View PostSo then don't send him on routes. If you want a receiver, then get one. We have 2 good receiveing TE's, we don't need all of them to be receivers.
At one point, he was better than what we had blocking wise, which is more speaking for our lack of blocking talent at TE than Alexander's actual skill at blocking.sigpic
:cool: 150 lbs of pure steel and sex appeal. :cool:
D.J. 55's Mock Draft:
:logo:
Denver Broncos General Manager
Comment
-
Originally posted by jhns View PostAlexander is not getting cut so it really doesn't matter. The coaching staff that has put him at #1 last year and 2 the years before does not agree with you guys. It is good to have one that can receive, but that is all just bonus. If they can't block, they are just a receiver. Alexander is one of the better blocking TE's in the game and has done real well for us. The TE position was is there to help the line out, not to be a big receiving threat. Alexander can catch well enough anyways. He was brought into this league as a receiving TE and he has gotten some catches every year.
They do not have to be Gates to be considered a good TE. People are just obsessed with stats, and the blocking stats are not as pretty. That is the only reason people are paying so much attention to the receiving TE's over the blocking ones. Any coach will tell you that it is far more important for them to block well though. I have seen it a lot on this team. We have had multiple TE's (Jackson for 1) that have been pretty good receivers and bad blockers, and guess what, they didn't play. The ones that are good blockers but bad receivers, you guessed it, still played. I think that pretty much proves the point. Just look at the last 3 years of our TE situation.
Edit: BTW, I am not saying anything about Jackson because I haven't watched him, I am just saying that receiving is not even a portion of a TE's job. That is not what you should be judging them on when saying if they are good or not. I am only saying that Alexander is very valuable to this team and isn't getting cut. Just wanted to clear this up so people don't think I am hating on Jackson.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CarolinaPanther View PostJust a quick note. Alexander is not one of the better blocking tight ends in the league. He is mediocre at best and was just the "best" blocking tight end the Broncos could put on the field.
In fact you can blame him for one of Jake's fumbles in the AFCCG.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SM19I don't think we have to choose. We can cut both Alexander and Jackson.
As for David Kircus, you guys don't know what he's capable of.John 11: 25-27
My Adopt-A-Bronco is D.J. Williams
Thanks Snk16
Comment
-
I really have no opinion of Jackson...
...but from what I've read/heard the coach's really love him.
Which makes me wonder: Why? How long has he been in Denver? I've seen every game, yet I can only remember one stinking catch he's made. And that's only because Adrian Wilson knocked him clear under the bench's of the Broncos sideline.
He's one of those players Mindfield as talking about that sticks around for no apparent reason.
Maybe he's a world-class kiss-a$$, like that dude from the Leave it to Beaver re-runs. *shrugs*.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by stnzed View Post...but from what I've read/heard the coach's really love him.
Which makes me wonder: Why? How long has he been in Denver? I've seen every game, yet I can only remember one stinking catch he's made. And that's only because Adrian Wilson knocked him clear under the bench's of the Broncos sideline.
He's one of those players Mindfield as talking about that sticks around for no apparent reason.
Maybe he's a world-class kiss-a$$, like that dude from the Leave it to Beaver re-runs. *shrugs*.....
Twice in his four years with the team he's been injured and missed majority of two seasons. And they moved him from being a wide receiver to tight end, that's a big switch.
Also Keith Burns made a career of being a Special Teamer very rarely did he ever get onto the field as linebacker.
Hey that's not really fair to compare Nate with Eddie Haskell from "Leave It To Beaver".Last edited by TXBRONC; 08-10-2007, 08:25 PM.John 11: 25-27
My Adopt-A-Bronco is D.J. Williams
Thanks Snk16
Comment
-
Originally posted by underrated29 View Posti am going to get flamed big time for this, but i dont really like kircus, he is fast and an underdog, and i like rooting for those, but he drops to many passes. we need hands, we got plenty of speed, and route runners, and imo need a reliable set of hands, that wont drop any passes.
i do like nate jax, and would like to see him play, but imo alexander is the better player for our team.
i have always liked shoate, and am gald he is performing, but how much depth do we need there? dr,chmp,dom,pay i suppose one more, but i couldnt tell ya who it should be.
i really like terrell,a s all know, and i would love for him not to be cut, but i dont see it happening. so i agree there.sigpic
Comment
Comment