Defending DeSean Jackson. . .

[ChrisSimpy]

I quoted you because you said something that made no sense, do you want me to requote it?



You got involved because you said some **** that made no sense under any context. You're plum dumb, if you want me to continue beating on you, I will if you want to give up... Then stop posting. This conversation is between two men, Ravage and I... Now the two of us our capable of having a conversation like grown men.

So let us.

- Ian

Lordy lordy lets try this one more time would you like me to go slow or draw you pictures? Maybe a nice pop-up book will help you understand?

I quoted someone else meaning I completely was not talking to your goony ass (pardon my insults and cursing but I just cant believe this guy)

I was talking to someone else who asked a question earlier in the thread.......

CP to anyone who can find the last Rookie OL to start under the Mike Shanahan regime on the O Line.
The reason to not draft OT at #12 is because first they are going to get more than $10 million in guaranteed money and second they will more likely than not sit on the bench their first year to learn a difficult system.

(Marshawn Lynch, last years #12 pick got $10.285 mill in guarantees)

I then guessed a few times and then came up with that conclusion my post which you quoted because you are a crazy.....

Meaning that my post made sense just not to someone with your low IQ

[Ravage!!!]

You are completely wrong and you know it! Housh, Reggie Wayne please don't make me go on throughout the last year and history, the Patriots didn't owe their number 1 for the super bowl bid, they owed their number two. The Giants didn't owe their number 1 for the super bowl win, they owed their number 2... Hester returned the opening Kickoff in his first year in the Super Bowl his first year.

I'm sincerely running out of examples, but I know that I never will... Because even if I personally run out of number two's, history will prove otherwise. A strong number 2 will always out weigh a strong Offensive Left Tackle.

- Ian

what do I mean? I think this says it all, Ian. I think its obvious what I'm saying. I'm saying that if you TRULY feel that a #2 is more valuable to a team than a LT, then you proved that you dont' know what you are talking about. Simple as that.

I can't prove it more than your own words... you said it all. Thank you for saving everyone so much time. Now we know what we are dealing with.

[The|Snake#16]

It's just getting tiring reiterating the same stuff to the same ignorant people, who played Junior High/Middle School Football, got three to four years of Madden under their wing and all of a sudden think that they are a draft expert because they follow Mel Kiper or WalterFootball or whoever else they want to read...

Seriously, play Risk, screw Madden, you want to learn Football, go to war. I know that might seem a little extreme, but Football was invented as something for the boys to do in between wars. Now follow, you have an awesome fighter pilot (WR), you don't go for a rediculous Defender (OT) if you have the chance, you go for the f'ing fighter pilot!

Now Snake, if you're the same Snake 16, I'm thinking of, you're beloved by the board, but you're a ****, you've always been a ****. Look forward to Senior Prom and focus on that. Let's reconvene your Junior year of College and then we'll talk, until then... Au revoir my friend.

1. Your analogies are terrible.
2. I'm not the same "snake" you're thinking of.
3. I'm not beloved by the boards, i'm not hated, but I wouldn't say i'm well known either.
4. I'm not normally rude to most people on these boards.
5. Senior Prom? Uh, too late.
6. Temper tantrums(i.e. what you are doing) aren't very mature, so trying to compare ME to a high schooler is a bit hypocritical, yes?

Au revoir.

[Cugel]

This is simple..and has been posted a number of times.

We have the chance to grab an OT that can possibly be the anchor and blindside protector of our franchise qb for the next ten years. OR.. we grab a small WR that can also return kicks.

Some want to try and say "why pay a 10 million dollar bonus to an OL that may sit the bench the first year." Brilliant. So the other option is to spend 10 million dollar bonus for an extra year of KO returns. Because we know the rookie WR isn't going ot play much, nor make an impact. So its not like you are getting 'impact' for that 10 million (that first year).

But as everyone knows. The trenches is where any team wins their ball games. Its the OL that wins games. Its the DL that wins games. Having the chance to build an OL that can give our stud QB some time, and future RBs room.. is how WE win games. Our OL in the SB years.. was stud. Great OLs can make average RBs look REALLY good. Poor OLs can make GREAT RBs look bad.

GOOD OLs can make a QB better. Poor OLs can make a Great QB look like crap. GOOD OL can help mediocre WRs better, because they give more time to get open. Poor OL makes great WRs have problems, because the QB can't get them the ball.

EVERYTHING revolves around the OL. Our second WR doesn't even get many passes when they are GOOD. Spending the extra money for some KO returns...is HARD to justify when your QB is getting slaughtered.

Dear Ravage:

Never argue with fools, because at a distance it's difficult for people to tell the difference between you and the fool.

Sincerely, Cugel.



You're trying to instill sense into a discussion that has far too many "no yur the moran!" posts in it.

[BroncosTX77]

Dear Ravage:

Never argue with fools, because at a distance it's difficult for people to tell the difference between you and the fool.

Sincerely, Cugel.



You're trying to instill sense into a discussion that has far too many "no yur the moran!" posts in it.

Don't you mean arguing on the internet is like the special olympics?

Because no matter who wins y'all are still retarded....