If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
maurice purify and mario urrutia and ahmad brooks are the other intersting cincinatti cuts mario uruttia is talented and should look into putting him on our practice squad
Foxworth > ONeal anywhere in the secondary position.
I disagree, but we will find out all we need to know about Foxworth this season. He is a FA next year so we should see his best season, maybe even an interception or two. I think with the new trend of excellent slot receivers, the nickel back is becoming a very important position.
My logic is, Fox/O'Neal might get burned the same number of times, but O'Neal would make some big plays at least. 9 and 10 int seasons IS a big deal, as the previous poster said...
I disagree, but we will find out all we need to know about Foxworth this season. He is a FA next year so we should see his best season, maybe even an interception or two. I think with the new trend of excellent slot receivers, the nickel back is becoming a very important position.
My logic is, Fox/O'Neal might get burned the same number of times, but O'Neal would make some big plays at least. 9 and 10 int seasons IS a big deal, as the previous poster said...
What good does 10 interceptions do for your team, when your giving up 20 TD's trying to get those interceptions?
You do know that's why he was cut in Denver, and Cincinnati right? Nobody's going to flat out cut a guy that is capable of 10 interceptions unless there's a damn good reason for it.
What good does 10 interceptions do for your team, when your giving up 20 TD's trying to get those interceptions?
You do know that's why he was cut in Denver, and Cincinnati right? Nobody's going to flat out cut a guy that is capable of 10 interceptions unless there's a damn good reason for it.
If we were to cut Foxworth right now, it would be for never looking back for the ball, never making a big play, and poor tackling. Obviously Foxworth is younger so he is more likely to improve than O'Neal, but I think we aren't going to re-sign him next year, so we should get what we can in a trade.
If we were to cut Foxworth right now, it would be for never looking back for the ball, never making a big play, and poor tackling. Obviously Foxworth is younger so he is more likely to improve than O'Neal, but I think we aren't going to re-sign him next year, so we should get what we can in a trade.
If we don't re-sign him next year, there's a great chance that he signs with another team, has a solid year, and Denver gets a compensatory pick as high as the third round.
Denver was trying to trade him during camp, and couldn't get anything higher than a 5th round pick for him.
What good does 10 interceptions do for your team, when your giving up 20 TD's trying to get those interceptions?
You do know that's why he was cut in Denver, and Cincinnati right? Nobody's going to flat out cut a guy that is capable of 10 interceptions unless there's a damn good reason for it.
20 TD's is a bit of an exaggeration.
He single handedly won some games for Denver, like that 4 INT game he had against the Chiefs.
He got burned in Denver cause we were expecting him to cover their best guys, but put him in at nickel or dime and have him cover the teams 3rd or 4th best receiver and you've got a good player.
What good does 10 interceptions do for your team, when your giving up 20 TD's trying to get those interceptions? You do know that's why he was cut in Denver, and Cincinnati right? Nobody's going to flat out cut a guy that is capable of 10 interceptions unless there's a damn good reason for it.
Don't mean to be nit picky but I believe we traded Deltha to the Bengals right? Anyway below is something I found on another website...so from what I gather the main reason the probably cut him is another player took his spot and they were probably still paying him starter money.
Comment: O'Neal was benched in favor of Leon Hall during the 2007 season and it has become clear that he is no longer the playmaker he once was. However, he did acclimate to the nickel cornerback role very well and is a team player. His athletic ability is waning, but he still makes plays on the ball in front of him while showing good anticipation and ball skills. He has very good hands and rarely drops an interception that he should catch. He still shows signs of being the fast, fluid athlete he once was. He can still be hesitant and often plays scared. His route recognition is too deliberate and his reactions probably will never be top notch. He has now had two subpar seasons in a row and the end could be near for O'Neal.
Thx,
Joe
To live is to suffer, to survive is to find meaning in the suffering.
Comment