Originally posted by lancane
View Post
first Woodyard can not be the key. He is way to small and can't shed blockers. If he has a fit in the NFL it is as the weakside LB in the 4-3 or as a nickel possibility. He can't be an every down LB in the 3-4 or we will be in real trouble. the LBs have to be able to get off of blocks. All of them. The OLBs are both big and generally can rush the passer, while one of them does it almost exclusively. Take a look at the way the Ravens, Chargers, and Steelers are built and play. We have to be able to get off blocks and rush the passer. Woodyard will get swallowed up and so will our run D.
Every comment I have read or seen from any scout would tend to disagree with your assessment that Brace is the better NT than Raji. The primary reason is that Brace has a tendency to play to high and get pushed back at the point of attack. In fact this is his primary weakness. As it so happens this is the worst weakness you would want at the NT position. Raji plays lower and tends to dominate more at the point of attack. He does not get caught playing too top heavy. I think Raji could play NT in the 3-4 or DT in the 4-3. He will be the first DT off the board and will probably have a good career in the NFL.
Comment