Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WR Gaffney to meet with Broncos

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Bowie Man View Post
    I pretty much agree, except for one thing: we have our #2 receiver in Royal. He may line up in the slot for the majority of plays but he's still the #2. Oh, and that list of players would be about perfect.
    In McDaniels offense, being the #2 is basically being the slot. Look at Welker, he's been the slot the past 2 years and flourished. Now, undoubtedly we will put Royal on the outside and hope to drop a couple bombs downfield, but more than likely, Royal, with his great route-running and quickness will be a ball-catching machine underneath and using his elusiveness similar to Welker. Our offense (in terms of personnel) actually compares very similarly to the makeup of the Patriots.
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #17
      As long as they don't break the bank on this players, i am happy.

      Comment


      • #18
        Many posters are complaining that we are filling our offensive needs in the FA. Well DUH! If we didn't fill the two gaps on offense, then how on earth are we to fill the defensive needs in the Draft? Did you expect us not to address them at all and just go into the season hurting at RB and WR depth again?

        The fact we are leaning so heavily on offense early means we won't have to use hardly any picks on the offensive side of the ball come draft time. I'd much rather us draft defensive then sign a bunch of high priced overrated FA's. :go:
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #19
          Clayton has more potential......

          could you imagine the face of opposing defenses when they see Marshall (6'4), Clayton (6'4), Royal lined up in the Welker/slot role, and Tony Scheffler



          sigpic


          FA Targets: DT Jason Jones, DT Pat Simms, S Reggie Smith, LB Dan Connor



          :cool:

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by hardcorebronco View Post
            Many posters are complaining that we are filling our offensive needs in the FA. Well DUH! If we didn't fill the two gaps on offense, then how on earth are we to fill the defensive needs in the Draft? Did you expect us not to address them at all and just go into the season hurting at RB and WR depth again?

            The fact we are leaning so heavily on offense early means we won't have to use hardly any picks on the offensive side of the ball come draft time. I'd much rather us draft defensive then sign a bunch of high priced overrated FA's. :go:
            I think that's mostly the Moreno fanboy club doing that. It's become obvious with the signings of two RB's (along with them supposedly offering Ward), that Denver is not going to draft their mancrush, and they obviously do not like it.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by getlynched47 View Post
              Clayton has more potential......

              could you imagine the face of opposing defenses when they see Marshall (6'4), Clayton (6'4), Royal lined up in the Welker/slot role, and Tony Scheffler

              I do not mind either, but I prefer Gaffney because of his familiarity with McD's system.

              Comment

              Working...
              X