I haven't heard lately who Denver will most likely make their first selection. Has it become Sanchez after his personal workout for Denver or are they still going to go with strong defensive players with multiple first round picks? I'd like to see Denver go for defense to start with (Raji or Jackson), but I can't get it out of my head how Simms and Orton can't seem to stay healthy for any length of time during a season when they are expected to be a starter at quarterback for 16 games. Going with Sanchez might leave Denver with only improving the defense in the short term with free agents. If they can't get him at 12 and have to give up several draft choices they could've used on young defensive talent for the future.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is Denver's top draft prospect now?
Collapse
X
-
I like Raji and it would take some acrobatics to get him I think we could fall back in our #18 we can take 2 second round picks with Ziggy Hood and Connor Barwin in the 2nd. Then use the picks we got from trading down to trade our #12 up and get Raji. These 3 are all good Defensive players that we need.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Papa-pwn View PostI can tell you who it WON'T be, it certainly isn't Maualuga, Sanchez, or Jackson.
Guarenteed our FO wants no part of these three.
However, leading candidates to be Denver Broncos are looking like Raji or Moreno
Comment
-
either jackson or orakpo at 12, and then hopefully malaluga at 18 although I dont think McDummy is going to draft a MLB at all early. If knowshon is there at 18 I think that would be a very good pick up as well.....
what would you do if percy harvin is still around in the 2nd round? he is slipping quite a bit now.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by biggbenns View PostHow can you say that the FO wants no part of those three? do you work for them? IMO Jackson is the only guy I wouldn't want on my team. And i still would take him if he is there at 18. Rey and Mark are going to be quality players in this league, and I think Rey will be the best out of this draft.
Comment
Comment