Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Todd McShay - Senior Bowl - Defensive Report

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Todd McShay - Senior Bowl - Defensive Report

    D-line stands out while LBs disappointCornerback group rates as strongest overall position at Senior BowlComment Email Print Share By Todd McShay
    Scouts Inc.
    Archive
    Senior Bowl week helped some players' draft stock and hurt that of others. Scouts Inc. goes position by position and ranks the defensive players who were in Mobile, Ala.





    Defensive Linemen
    Rank Player Position School
    1. Dan Williams DT Tennessee
    2. Jared Odrick DT Penn State
    3. Alex Carrington DE Arkansas State
    4. Lamarr Houston DT Texas
    5. Terrence Cody DT Alabama
    6. Tyson Alualu DT California
    7. Brandon Lang DE Troy
    8. D'Anthony Smith DT Louisiana Tech
    9. Mike Neal DT Purdue
    10. Geno Atkins DT Georgia
    11. George Selvie DE South Florida
    12. Cam Thomas DT North Carolina
    13. Austen Lane DE Murray State
    14. C.J. Wilson DE East Carolina
    15. Jeff Owens DE Georgia

    The top two defensive linemen at this year's Senior Bowl play inside. Williams is a classic two-gap run-stuffer with potential to play nose tackle if drafted by a 3-4 team. There's talk that Odrick could fit well as a 5-technique in a 3-4 scheme, but we think he's better-suited for a more traditional tackle role, or possibly even as a 3-technique, because he displays the necessary quickness and instincts to penetrate and pursue in the NFL. There's a good chance that both Williams and Odrick will join fellow defensive tackles Ndamukong Suh (Nebraska), Gerald McCoy (Oklahoma) and Brian Price (UCLA) as first-round picks.




    No position group had more individuals exceed expectations in Mobile than the defensive line. DEs Carrington and Lang and DTs Houston and Alualu all played lights-out during the four days of intense practices. Carrington simply overpowered offensive linemen at the point of attack and has the potential to play as a 5-technique in a three-man front or power end in a 4-3. Lang isn't quite as big but impressed coaches and scouts with his combination of quickness and strength. Houston and Alualu are both projected as 3-techniques in the NFL, where they will need to use quickness and relentlessness to overcome a lack of ideal size.



    On the flip side, DT Cody, DE Wilson and DT Owens failed to live up to the hype. At 370 pounds Cody is in poor physical condition, and he will always be battling to keep his weight in check. Wilson showed very little explosiveness off the edge and projects as a late-round pick, while Owens was the least impressive of the bunch and showed few redeeming qualities as a pro prospect.




    Linebackers
    Rank Player Position School
    1. Brandon Graham OLB Michigan
    2. Sean Weatherspoon OLB Missouri
    3. Darryl Sharpton ILB Miami
    4. Daryl Washington ILB TCU
    5. Rod Muckelroy ILB Texas
    6. Eric Norwood OLB South Carolina
    7. Nawa'akoa Misi OLB Utah
    8. Jamar Chaney ILB Mississippi State
    9. Justin Cole OLB San Jose State
    10. Dekoda Watson OLB Florida State
    11. Cameron Sheffield OLB Troy
    12. Phillip Dillard ILB Nebraska
    13. Andrew Edds OLB Iowa
    14. Antonio Coleman OLB Auburn

    Graham was the clear headliner in what was an underwhelming group overall. He showed quickness, active hands and a nonstop motor as a pass-rusher, and his instincts and discipline against the run were impressive. Graham played end in college but lacks ideal height for the position, so we grade him as an outside linebacker. He has moved into the late-first-round discussion.



    Weatherspoon displayed good instincts, closing burst and toughness at the point of attack, but he is too inconsistent in space and struggles to take proper angles and sift through traffic at times. It won't surprise us if Weatherspoon settles into a starting role on the strong side, where he won't be asked to operate in the open field as often.



    Norwood was a hybrid DE/OLB in college but made a full-time move to the strong side during Senior Bowl week. While he struggled at times at the point of attack, Norwood was able to show good overall versatility in the passing game. He can hold up in coverage and occasionally bend the edge as a pass-rusher.



    Misi and Sheffield are also hybrid types who turned some heads with their versatile performances. Misi displayed good awareness in underneath zone coverage and a relentless motor rushing off the edge. He has emerged as a possible late-second-round selection. Sheffield is rated a couple rounds lower, but he was able to improve his stock by showing enough fluidity in his drops and good overall awareness in underneath coverage.



    On the inside, Sharpton is stronger than his size suggests and has good overall range, and Muckelroy is as instinctive as they come against the run. Both flashed the ability to become contributors and perhaps even starters down the road in the NFL. Washington came in lighter than expected, and due to his lack of strength he might be better-suited to move to the outside. He and Watson both displayed above-average athleticism and range both as run-stoppers and in coverage and would make nice fits on the weak side.



    Defensive Backs
    Rank Player Position School
    1. Kyle Wilson CB Boise State
    2. Nate Allen S South Florida
    3. Taylor Mays S USC
    4. Perrish Cox CB Oklahoma State
    5. Devin McCourty CB Rutgers
    6. Patrick Robinson CB Florida State
    7. Christopher Cook CB Virginia
    8. Larry Asante S Nebraska
    9. Javier Arenas CB Alabama
    10. Myron Rolle S Florida State
    11. Trevard Lindley CB Kentucky
    12. Kurt Coleman S Ohio State
    13. Syd'Quan Thompson CB California
    14. Harry Coleman S LSU
    15. Brandon Ghee CB Wake Forest
    16. Jerome Murphy CB South Florida
    17. Kyle McCarthy S Notre Dame
    18. Terrell Skinner S Maryland

    No individual position group impressed us more than the cornerbacks, and Wilson led the way all week. He looked quick and agile and was a strong, physical presence in bump-and-run coverage. Wilson is a solid cover corner who is now in the conversation as a possible late-first-round pick.



    Cox, McCourty and Robinson weren't as consistent as Wilson but showed they have the natural ability to develop into effective NFL starters in time. The next corner on the list is Cook, who showed above-average hip fluidity and body control for a 6-foot-1¾ cornerback.



    Conversely, Arenas saw his stock slip because his lack of ideal top-end speed exposed his limitations in coverage.



    Mays arrived in Mobile as our top-ranked safety and showed impressive closing speed for his size. However, Mays was frequently seen looking for the big hit rather than locating the ball during practice. He did have an interception in the game, but Mays' disappointing overall performance opened the door for Allen to gain some ground. Allen took full advantage.



    Allen isn't as big or powerful as Mays, but he is an adequate open-field tackler. More importantly, he was so smooth getting in and out of cuts that we feel confident in his ability to match up with slot receivers in man coverage. Mays does not have that ability, and Allen now ranks ahead of him on our board.



    Finally, Rolle's surprisingly strong showing was one of the feel-good stories of the week. The Rhodes Scholar showed up at a shredded 217 pounds and displayed even better agility and fluidity than we saw on tape prior to his taking a year off to study at Oxford. Rolle now has a chance to come off the board in the first three rounds if he can convince at least one team that he is dedicated to playing a full NFL career.

  • #2
    Oh boy I'm sure that little bold part made you happy

    Good read though. Thanks for posting.

    Comment


    • #3
      Todd McShay - Senior Bowl - Offense Report

      Pike leads QBs, McCluster tops RBsWide receivers and offensive linemen have up-and-down weeksComment Email Print Share By Todd McShay
      Scouts Inc.
      Archive
      Senior Bowl week helped some players' draft stock and hurt that of others. Scouts Inc. goes position by position and ranks the offensive players who were in Mobile, Ala.



      Quarterbacks
      Rank Player School
      1. Tony Pike Cincinnati
      2. Tim Tebow Florida
      3. Jarrett Brown West Virginia
      4. Dan LeFevour Central Michigan
      5. Sean Canfield Oregon State
      6. Zac Robinson Oklahoma State

      Pike appears to be the best all-around prospect from this year's below-average Senior Bowl crop. He needs to add bulk to his lanky frame and is working on getting the ball out more quickly, but he has excellent size potential, shows good poise in the pocket and can be deadly accurate when in rhythm.



      Based solely on his potential to develop into a traditional starting quarterback, Tebow would rank fifth or sixth on this list, but the possibility of him contributing in other facets of the game -- Wildcat packages, as a short-yardage quarterback, with a move to H-back -- is the reason he's hanging on to a third-round grade.



      Brown is arguably the most naturally gifted of the group but also is the most raw. LeFevour is a playmaker with quick feet and very good instincts, but his passing mechanics need polishing. Canfield's inconsistency in Mobile was disappointing, but he still has mid- to late-round developmental value. Finally, Robinson exceeded expectations during the week, showing enough tools to warrant late-round consideration in a West Coast system.




      Running Backs
      Rank Player School
      1. Dexter McCluster Mississippi
      2. Ben Tate Auburn
      3. Anthony Dixon Mississippi State
      4. Chris Brown Oklahoma
      5. Joique Bell Wayne State (MI)
      6. LeGarrette Blount Oregon
      7. Rashawn Jackson Virginia
      8. Stafon Johnson USC
      9. John Conner Kentucky
      10. Lonyae Miller Fresno State
      11. Roy Upchurch Alabama

      McCluster clearly was the most explosive back in Mobile. He lacks the size to develop into an every-down NFL back but is a dangerous open-field runner who can turn the corner when he gets a seam, separate from coverage working out of the slot or the backfield, and return punts and kickoffs.



      Tate ran downhill consistently, and small-school prospect Bell improved his draft stock by flashing better-than-expected wiggle in the hole. Blount had just an average week, and Miller, who played behind Ryan Mathews at Fresno State, failed to take advantage of his opportunity to step out of Mathews' shadow. Both Miller and Blount appeared hesitant and took too long to get upfield, which is especially concerning considering their size.



      Jackson is the more versatile of the two fullbacks, running, catching the ball and holding up in pass protection better than Connor did. On the other hand, Connor proved to be the better run-blocker by showing superior strength at the point of attack.



      Wide Receivers
      Rank Player School
      1. Mardy Gilyard Cincinnati
      2. Taylor Price Ohio
      3. Riley Cooper Florida
      4. Andre Roberts The Citadel
      5. Jacoby Ford Clemson
      6. Jeremy Williams Tulane
      7. Danario Alexander Missouri
      8. Shay Hodge Mississippi
      9. Donald Jones Youngstown State
      10. Joe Webb UAB

      Gilyard is not a blazer and lacks adequate size, but he is a smooth athlete and a savvy route-runner. In our opinion, he emerged as the top wide receiver from the Senior Bowl crop.



      Price started the week strong but disappeared a bit down the stretch. He displayed good burst out of breaks and above-average ball skills, which is why we think he's an underrated prospect to watch. It's also important to note that Price did not play with competent quarterbacks in college, which helps explain why his production didn't match his potential.



      Cooper and Roberts both ran polished routes and consistently caught the ball away from their frames. Ford was by far the fastest of the group in terms of straight-line speed but wasted too much time getting in and out of breaks and was plagued by drops throughout the week. Williams was intriguing in terms of burst and ability to snatch anything thrown in his vicinity, but he needs polishing and must expand his ability to run the complete route tree.



      Alexander and Hodge flashed potential throughout the week but still lack tempo in their routes and suddenness when working defenders, which leads to concerns about their ability to consistently separate at the next level.



      Tight Ends
      Rank Player School
      1. Anthony McCoy USC
      2. Ed ****son Oregon
      3. Garrett Graham Wisconsin
      4. Dorin ****erson Pittsburgh
      5. Jimmy Graham Miami
      6. Mike Hoomanawanui Illinois
      7. Colin Peek Alabama

      McCoy and ****son both fought the ball early in the week but were able to settle into a groove by mid-week. McCoy carries some off-field baggage and lacks elite speed, but he's an effective in-line blocker with great route-running skills and hands in the passing game. ****son is undersized and will never be strong at the point of attack, but he has value in the second- to third-round range because of his natural athleticism and potential to stretch the middle of the field.



      Garrett Graham appeared lean during the weigh-in, and while he caught the ball well, he struggled to gain consistent separation and disappeared during practices all week. Give credit to ****erson, who lined up at receiver at times. He struggled early on against a strong crop of cornerbacks but clearly got more comfortable as the week went on and was able to showcase his versatility as an H-back/wide receiver hybrid.



      Jimmy Graham is the most intriguing prospect from this group because his athleticism gives him a nearly unlimited ceiling. However, because he went to Miami on a basketball scholarship and played just one year of football for the Hurricanes, he needs to develop a more aggressive mentality and is a work in progress in terms of awareness.



      Offensive Linemen
      Rank Player Position School
      1. Mike Iupati G Idaho
      2. Jon Asamoah G Illinois
      3. Vladimir Ducasse G UMass
      4. Selvish Capers T West Virginia
      5. Zane Beadles T Utah
      6. Mike Johnson G Alabama
      7. Chris Scott T Tennessee
      8. John Jerry G Mississippi
      9. J.D. Walton C Baylor
      10. Mitch Petrus G Arkansas
      11. Theodore Larsen G NC State
      12. Thomas Welch T Vanderbilt
      13. Ciron Black T LSU
      14. Ed Wang T Virginia Tech
      15. Sam Young T Notre Dame
      16. Matt Tennant C Boston College
      17. Shawn Lauavo G Arizona State
      18. Eric Olsen C Notre Dame
      19. Jeff Byers C USC

      Three of the top six tackles on our draft board are underclassmen, and not one of the three seniors in that group (Oklahoma State's Russell Okung, Oklahoma's Trent Williams and USC's Charles Brown) was in Mobile, leaving Capers as the top-ranked tackle at the Senior Bowl. Although he looked quick and agile during individual drills, he was inconsistent during one-on-one drills, team periods and the game.



      Iupati separated from the rest of the guard class and showed he has what it takes to start as a rookie. He consistently dominated at the point of attack as a run-blocker and in pass protection, and he came out of the week as the top-rated overall prospect on either roster.



      Three prospects who played offensive tackle in college appear to be better fits at guard: Ducasse, Beadles and Scott. Unlike Beadles and Scott, Ducasse appeared agile and quick enough to hold his own on the outside, but he is too raw to trust on the edge at this point. He isn't a great hand fighter, and his footwork is unpolished.



      This year's center class is not deep, and that showed in Mobile. Walton and Larsen fared better than the other three centers, but none showed signs of being able to start early in his career.

      Comment


      • #4
        Sort of surprised Mike Neal is ahead of Atkins on that list. I didn't get to watch the South practices, but Neal wasn't ever impressive in the North practices, and then a non factor during the game. Atkins played a very good game I thought.

        Thanks for posting.
        sigpic

        I think Ben Tate will be the best back taken in the 2010 draft. (5/3/10)
        SportsXPicks, check out the Rants and Opinions section

        Comment


        • #5
          I think It'd be better to have the defensive report and offensive report as separate threads.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think Aluala is a better 5 techinque prospect than Odrick. Odrick will be better off in a 43.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by broncofansd
              D-line stands out while LBs disappointCornerback group rates as strongest overall position at Senior BowlComment Email Print Share By Todd McShay
              Scouts Inc.
              Archive
              Senior Bowl week helped some players' draft stock and hurt that of others. Scouts Inc. goes position by position and ranks the defensive players who were in Mobile, Ala.





              Defensive Linemen
              Rank Player Position School
              1. Dan Williams DT Tennessee
              2. Jared Odrick DT Penn State
              3. Alex Carrington DE Arkansas State
              4. Lamarr Houston DT Texas
              5. Terrence Cody DT Alabama
              6. Tyson Alualu DT California
              7. Brandon Lang DE Troy
              8. D'Anthony Smith DT Louisiana Tech
              9. Mike Neal DT Purdue
              10. Geno Atkins DT Georgia
              11. George Selvie DE South Florida
              12. Cam Thomas DT North Carolina
              13. Austen Lane DE Murray State
              14. C.J. Wilson DE East Carolina
              15. Jeff Owens DE Georgia

              The top two defensive linemen at this year's Senior Bowl play inside. Williams is a classic two-gap run-stuffer with potential to play nose tackle if drafted by a 3-4 team. There's talk that Odrick could fit well as a 5-technique in a 3-4 scheme, but we think he's better-suited for a more traditional tackle role, or possibly even as a 3-technique, because he displays the necessary quickness and instincts to penetrate and pursue in the NFL. There's a good chance that both Williams and Odrick will join fellow defensive tackles Ndamukong Suh (Nebraska), Gerald McCoy (Oklahoma) and Brian Price (UCLA) as first-round picks.




              No position group had more individuals exceed expectations in Mobile than the defensive line. DEs Carrington and Lang and DTs Houston and Alualu all played lights-out during the four days of intense practices. Carrington simply overpowered offensive linemen at the point of attack and has the potential to play as a 5-technique in a three-man front or power end in a 4-3. Lang isn't quite as big but impressed coaches and scouts with his combination of quickness and strength. Houston and Alualu are both projected as 3-techniques in the NFL, where they will need to use quickness and relentlessness to overcome a lack of ideal size.



              On the flip side, DT Cody, DE Wilson and DT Owens failed to live up to the hype. At 370 pounds Cody is in poor physical condition, and he will always be battling to keep his weight in check. Wilson showed very little explosiveness off the edge and projects as a late-round pick, while Owens was the least impressive of the bunch and showed few redeeming qualities as a pro prospect.




              Linebackers
              Rank Player Position School
              1. Brandon Graham OLB Michigan
              2. Sean Weatherspoon OLB Missouri
              3. Darryl Sharpton ILB Miami
              4. Daryl Washington ILB TCU
              5. Rod Muckelroy ILB Texas
              6. Eric Norwood OLB South Carolina
              7. Nawa'akoa Misi OLB Utah
              8. Jamar Chaney ILB Mississippi State
              9. Justin Cole OLB San Jose State
              10. Dekoda Watson OLB Florida State
              11. Cameron Sheffield OLB Troy
              12. Phillip Dillard ILB Nebraska
              13. Andrew Edds OLB Iowa
              14. Antonio Coleman OLB Auburn

              Graham was the clear headliner in what was an underwhelming group overall. He showed quickness, active hands and a nonstop motor as a pass-rusher, and his instincts and discipline against the run were impressive. Graham played end in college but lacks ideal height for the position, so we grade him as an outside linebacker. He has moved into the late-first-round discussion.



              Weatherspoon displayed good instincts, closing burst and toughness at the point of attack, but he is too inconsistent in space and struggles to take proper angles and sift through traffic at times. It won't surprise us if Weatherspoon settles into a starting role on the strong side, where he won't be asked to operate in the open field as often.



              Norwood was a hybrid DE/OLB in college but made a full-time move to the strong side during Senior Bowl week. While he struggled at times at the point of attack, Norwood was able to show good overall versatility in the passing game. He can hold up in coverage and occasionally bend the edge as a pass-rusher.



              Misi and Sheffield are also hybrid types who turned some heads with their versatile performances. Misi displayed good awareness in underneath zone coverage and a relentless motor rushing off the edge. He has emerged as a possible late-second-round selection. Sheffield is rated a couple rounds lower, but he was able to improve his stock by showing enough fluidity in his drops and good overall awareness in underneath coverage.



              On the inside, Sharpton is stronger than his size suggests and has good overall range, and Muckelroy is as instinctive as they come against the run. Both flashed the ability to become contributors and perhaps even starters down the road in the NFL. Washington came in lighter than expected, and due to his lack of strength he might be better-suited to move to the outside. He and Watson both displayed above-average athleticism and range both as run-stoppers and in coverage and would make nice fits on the weak side.



              Defensive Backs
              Rank Player Position School
              1. Kyle Wilson CB Boise State
              2. Nate Allen S South Florida
              3. Taylor Mays S USC
              4. Perrish Cox CB Oklahoma State
              5. Devin McCourty CB Rutgers
              6. Patrick Robinson CB Florida State
              7. Christopher Cook CB Virginia
              8. Larry Asante S Nebraska
              9. Javier Arenas CB Alabama
              10. Myron Rolle S Florida State
              11. Trevard Lindley CB Kentucky
              12. Kurt Coleman S Ohio State
              13. Syd'Quan Thompson CB California
              14. Harry Coleman S LSU
              15. Brandon Ghee CB Wake Forest
              16. Jerome Murphy CB South Florida
              17. Kyle McCarthy S Notre Dame
              18. Terrell Skinner S Maryland

              No individual position group impressed us more than the cornerbacks, and Wilson led the way all week. He looked quick and agile and was a strong, physical presence in bump-and-run coverage. Wilson is a solid cover corner who is now in the conversation as a possible late-first-round pick.



              Cox, McCourty and Robinson weren't as consistent as Wilson but showed they have the natural ability to develop into effective NFL starters in time. The next corner on the list is Cook, who showed above-average hip fluidity and body control for a 6-foot-1¾ cornerback.



              Conversely, Arenas saw his stock slip because his lack of ideal top-end speed exposed his limitations in coverage.



              Mays arrived in Mobile as our top-ranked safety and showed impressive closing speed for his size. However, Mays was frequently seen looking for the big hit rather than locating the ball during practice. He did have an interception in the game, but Mays' disappointing overall performance opened the door for Allen to gain some ground. Allen took full advantage.



              Allen isn't as big or powerful as Mays, but he is an adequate open-field tackler. More importantly, he was so smooth getting in and out of cuts that we feel confident in his ability to match up with slot receivers in man coverage. Mays does not have that ability, and Allen now ranks ahead of him on our board.



              Finally, Rolle's surprisingly strong showing was one of the feel-good stories of the week. The Rhodes Scholar showed up at a shredded 217 pounds and displayed even better agility and fluidity than we saw on tape prior to his taking a year off to study at Oxford. Rolle now has a chance to come off the board in the first three rounds if he can convince at least one team that he is dedicated to playing a full NFL career
              .


              hey mindfield...funny how i said mays wouldnt even be a top 3 safety if oakland didnt take him and that rolle would enter rd 3 consideration before draft day despite being out a year....

              only reason i bring it up is because you and i have been at odds over mays and rolle for sometime.....

              but dont worry i have been wrong before to...lol just pointing out how wack mayis.....lol

              Comment


              • #8
                Sorry Horseman - but I had to.



                Do I think Alualu is a very good football player - Yes - I just don't think he is a great prospect for the Broncos.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Todd McShay - Senior Bowl - Offensive Report

                  Pike leads QBs, McCluster tops RBsWide receivers and offensive linemen have up-and-down weeksComment Email Print Share By Todd McShay
                  Scouts Inc.
                  Archive
                  Senior Bowl week helped some players' draft stock and hurt that of others. Scouts Inc. goes position by position and ranks the offensive players who were in Mobile, Ala.



                  Quarterbacks
                  Rank Player School
                  1. Tony Pike Cincinnati
                  2. Tim Tebow Florida
                  3. Jarrett Brown West Virginia
                  4. Dan LeFevour Central Michigan
                  5. Sean Canfield Oregon State
                  6. Zac Robinson Oklahoma State

                  Pike appears to be the best all-around prospect from this year's below-average Senior Bowl crop. He needs to add bulk to his lanky frame and is working on getting the ball out more quickly, but he has excellent size potential, shows good poise in the pocket and can be deadly accurate when in rhythm.



                  Based solely on his potential to develop into a traditional starting quarterback, Tebow would rank fifth or sixth on this list, but the possibility of him contributing in other facets of the game -- Wildcat packages, as a short-yardage quarterback, with a move to H-back -- is the reason he's hanging on to a third-round grade.



                  Brown is arguably the most naturally gifted of the group but also is the most raw. LeFevour is a playmaker with quick feet and very good instincts, but his passing mechanics need polishing. Canfield's inconsistency in Mobile was disappointing, but he still has mid- to late-round developmental value. Finally, Robinson exceeded expectations during the week, showing enough tools to warrant late-round consideration in a West Coast system.




                  Running Backs
                  Rank Player School
                  1. Dexter McCluster Mississippi
                  2. Ben Tate Auburn
                  3. Anthony Dixon Mississippi State
                  4. Chris Brown Oklahoma
                  5. Joique Bell Wayne State (MI)
                  6. LeGarrette Blount Oregon
                  7. Rashawn Jackson Virginia
                  8. Stafon Johnson USC
                  9. John Conner Kentucky
                  10. Lonyae Miller Fresno State
                  11. Roy Upchurch Alabama

                  McCluster clearly was the most explosive back in Mobile. He lacks the size to develop into an every-down NFL back but is a dangerous open-field runner who can turn the corner when he gets a seam, separate from coverage working out of the slot or the backfield, and return punts and kickoffs.



                  Tate ran downhill consistently, and small-school prospect Bell improved his draft stock by flashing better-than-expected wiggle in the hole. Blount had just an average week, and Miller, who played behind Ryan Mathews at Fresno State, failed to take advantage of his opportunity to step out of Mathews' shadow. Both Miller and Blount appeared hesitant and took too long to get upfield, which is especially concerning considering their size.



                  Jackson is the more versatile of the two fullbacks, running, catching the ball and holding up in pass protection better than Connor did. On the other hand, Connor proved to be the better run-blocker by showing superior strength at the point of attack.



                  Wide Receivers
                  Rank Player School
                  1. Mardy Gilyard Cincinnati
                  2. Taylor Price Ohio
                  3. Riley Cooper Florida
                  4. Andre Roberts The Citadel
                  5. Jacoby Ford Clemson
                  6. Jeremy Williams Tulane
                  7. Danario Alexander Missouri
                  8. Shay Hodge Mississippi
                  9. Donald Jones Youngstown State
                  10. Joe Webb UAB

                  Gilyard is not a blazer and lacks adequate size, but he is a smooth athlete and a savvy route-runner. In our opinion, he emerged as the top wide receiver from the Senior Bowl crop.



                  Price started the week strong but disappeared a bit down the stretch. He displayed good burst out of breaks and above-average ball skills, which is why we think he's an underrated prospect to watch. It's also important to note that Price did not play with competent quarterbacks in college, which helps explain why his production didn't match his potential.



                  Cooper and Roberts both ran polished routes and consistently caught the ball away from their frames. Ford was by far the fastest of the group in terms of straight-line speed but wasted too much time getting in and out of breaks and was plagued by drops throughout the week. Williams was intriguing in terms of burst and ability to snatch anything thrown in his vicinity, but he needs polishing and must expand his ability to run the complete route tree.



                  Alexander and Hodge flashed potential throughout the week but still lack tempo in their routes and suddenness when working defenders, which leads to concerns about their ability to consistently separate at the next level.



                  Tight Ends
                  Rank Player School
                  1. Anthony McCoy USC
                  2. Ed ****son Oregon
                  3. Garrett Graham Wisconsin
                  4. Dorin ****erson Pittsburgh
                  5. Jimmy Graham Miami
                  6. Mike Hoomanawanui Illinois
                  7. Colin Peek Alabama

                  McCoy and ****son both fought the ball early in the week but were able to settle into a groove by mid-week. McCoy carries some off-field baggage and lacks elite speed, but he's an effective in-line blocker with great route-running skills and hands in the passing game. ****son is undersized and will never be strong at the point of attack, but he has value in the second- to third-round range because of his natural athleticism and potential to stretch the middle of the field.



                  Garrett Graham appeared lean during the weigh-in, and while he caught the ball well, he struggled to gain consistent separation and disappeared during practices all week. Give credit to ****erson, who lined up at receiver at times. He struggled early on against a strong crop of cornerbacks but clearly got more comfortable as the week went on and was able to showcase his versatility as an H-back/wide receiver hybrid.



                  Jimmy Graham is the most intriguing prospect from this group because his athleticism gives him a nearly unlimited ceiling. However, because he went to Miami on a basketball scholarship and played just one year of football for the Hurricanes, he needs to develop a more aggressive mentality and is a work in progress in terms of awareness.



                  Offensive Linemen
                  Rank Player Position School
                  1. Mike Iupati G Idaho
                  2. Jon Asamoah G Illinois
                  3. Vladimir Ducasse G UMass
                  4. Selvish Capers T West Virginia
                  5. Zane Beadles T Utah
                  6. Mike Johnson G Alabama
                  7. Chris Scott T Tennessee
                  8. John Jerry G Mississippi
                  9. J.D. Walton C Baylor
                  10. Mitch Petrus G Arkansas
                  11. Theodore Larsen G NC State
                  12. Thomas Welch T Vanderbilt
                  13. Ciron Black T LSU
                  14. Ed Wang T Virginia Tech
                  15. Sam Young T Notre Dame
                  16. Matt Tennant C Boston College
                  17. Shawn Lauavo G Arizona State
                  18. Eric Olsen C Notre Dame
                  19. Jeff Byers C USC

                  Three of the top six tackles on our draft board are underclassmen, and not one of the three seniors in that group (Oklahoma State's Russell Okung, Oklahoma's Trent Williams and USC's Charles Brown) was in Mobile, leaving Capers as the top-ranked tackle at the Senior Bowl. Although he looked quick and agile during individual drills, he was inconsistent during one-on-one drills, team periods and the game.



                  Iupati separated from the rest of the guard class and showed he has what it takes to start as a rookie. He consistently dominated at the point of attack as a run-blocker and in pass protection, and he came out of the week as the top-rated overall prospect on either roster.



                  Three prospects who played offensive tackle in college appear to be better fits at guard: Ducasse, Beadles and Scott. Unlike Beadles and Scott, Ducasse appeared agile and quick enough to hold his own on the outside, but he is too raw to trust on the edge at this point. He isn't a great hand fighter, and his footwork is unpolished.



                  This year's center class is not deep, and that showed in Mobile. Walton and Larsen fared better than the other three centers, but none showed signs of being able to start early in his career

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hoserman117
                    I think It'd be better to have the defensive report and offensive report as separate threads.

                    Just posted - can't edit anymore -

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I do have to agree with McShay about the Center class being poor.


                      Besides Maurkice Pouncey it does not look like any Center would be able to start for a team from day 1.


                      The next best in my mind Matt Tennant - probably take 2-3 years.


                      I think if we upgrade the Left Guard Position that either we sign Eugene Amano who has NFL starts at Center or keep Wiegman for 1 more year. That is unless we grab Pouncey.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Pretty sad that the top rated senior QB is a career backup at best.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A player I have been high on Chris Cook - "The next corner on the list is Cook, who showed above-average hip fluidity and body control for a 6-foot-1¾ cornerback."


                          I think that after drafting 5'9" Alfonso Smith that drafting Chris Cook in the 3rd/4th Round would be a nice addition.


                          Especially when playing San Diego with Gates - 6'5" , Jackson - 6'5" and Floyd - 6'4"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Why do you listen to all the garbage McShay writes? He's simply a moron.
                            sigpic
                            St. Louis Rams GM

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              That is your opinion. Why are you sooo mad???


                              He has stated alot of true stuff. He pick Vladimir Duccasse to be a top 32 player and he has a chance to be 1st/2nd Round.


                              He isn't high on Tebow or Clausen - which I agree on.


                              Oh yeah and the 3 technique is spot on!!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              😀
                              🥰
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎