The speculation I've read is that the NY Giants (#15) are dying to trade up to draft Rolando McClain.
If we could get another #3 (11 to 15 has a difference of 200 points, which is close to what the Giant's pick in the 3rd round is worth---210).
The Broncos could swap #1s with the Giants for their 3rd round selection, and still have their pick of Pouncey or Iupati.
I would be fine with that, particularly if they used the additional #3 for Dan LeFevour.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Not sure I want to trade down
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lancane View PostI could see us forgoing an inside linebacker in the upper rounds and using it on someone for outside depth. But I don't feel that either is as important right now compared to wide receiver or the offensive line.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lancane View PostMost of the defensive players from last year are returning, the same players that were rated as the 7th overall defense in 2009, we added Williams, Bannan and Green, all three will be playing in rotation with the same athletes that played a major part in our defensive promise last year. So they are indeed a better unit. Adding a defensive end would help, I admit that...but it's not a need to be competitive.
Woodyard is not the ideal inside linebacker, Haggan and Larsen are unknowns on the inside, that does not mean that they can not play inside...there is a chance that they can not handle the role itself. So I would say getting depth from the third on, someone who could likely step up as a starter if need be would be smart. On the outside we have Dumvervil, Moss, Ayers and Haggan could return outside if needed.
Fields done a solid job but Peterson and McBean were awful. Peterson was always going to be cut but McBean is still here.
Bannan is a good LDE starter and Green is a great pass rusher on 3rd down but I don't want McBean starting at RDE again
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hoserman117 View PostI think we also need some OLB depth. Haggan is playing inside now, so unless we get somebody to start ahead of him, we only have Reid who is coming off of injury and Jarvis Moss as backup OLB's. There are some good guys we could get in the 3rd - 4th round range.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronx_2003 View Post2 down inside LB - Haggan, Larsen, Woodyard
LG - Olsen
RG - Kuper
You seem to disregard RDE, any reason?
Woodyard is not the ideal inside linebacker, Haggan and Larsen are unknowns on the inside, that does not mean that they can not play inside...there is a chance that they can not handle the role itself. So I would say getting depth from the third on, someone who could likely step up as a starter if need be would be smart. On the outside we have Dumvervil, Moss, Ayers and Haggan could return outside if needed.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronx_2003 View PostThere's some talk of trading down with Phily and getting another 2nd or 3rd but Phily pick around # 24 I believe.
Is it really worth missing out on a stud receiver like Bryant or quality 3-4 DE like Odrick just for the sake of getting another pick, espeically if its just another 3rd round player.
You also have to be very careful. If we go down to 24 then these will be gone -
Dan Williams
Bryant
Odrick
Pouncey
The main players we are targeting.
Even picking up a 2nd is OK but we still miss out on the elite talent. Huge drop off after Bryant, Odrick and Pouncey IMO
We have a decent number of picks, maybe we should just get a stud at 11
Leave a comment:
-
I think we also need some OLB depth. Haggan is playing inside now, so unless we get somebody to start ahead of him, we only have Reid who is coming off of injury and Jarvis Moss as backup OLB's. There are some good guys we could get in the 3rd - 4th round range.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lancane View PostWe are in fact a wideout, linebacker, center and guard away from being solid. After that, we should get prospects that could eventually fit those other needs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronx_2003 View PostNot sure I agree with 'alot' of holes, we need some depth in some areas but the only starters or main contributors I believe are -
RDE
WR - To provide a downfield threat
C
#2 RB
K/P R - Maybe
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lancane View PostWe are in fact a wideout, linebacker, center and guard away from being solid. After that, we should get prospects that could eventually fit those other needs.
LG - Olsen
RG - Kuper
You seem to disregard RDE, any reason?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronx_2003 View PostNot sure I agree with 'alot' of holes, we need some depth in some areas but the only starters or main contributors I believe are -
RDE
WR - To provide a downfield threat
C
#2 RB
K/P R - Maybe
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lancane View PostThere are only two teams I could see us trading with, either with San Francisco for the 17th and 79th overall picks or with New England for the 22nd and 44th overall picks.
It would cost Philadelphia at least their first and both thirds if not more to move up to the 11th overall spot.
Right now my gut feeling is we stay and take either Bryant, McClain or Williams.
I don't mind trading down if it nets us another 2nd and we still get one of our main 4 targets. Thats a very good situation
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ERoyal248 View PostDisagree, we have a ton of holes to fill, need as many picks as possible. Thats a fair point of missing out on elite talent, but if we can get an extra 2nd in a draft this loaded, you do it. I said all offseason i want to trade down, we agree to disagree. We'll see Thursday soon enough.
:go:
RDE
WR - To provide a downfield threat
C
#2 RB
K/P R - Maybe
Leave a comment:
-
There are only two teams I could see us trading with, either with San Francisco for the 17th and 79th overall picks or with New England for the 22nd and 44th overall picks.
It would cost Philadelphia at least their first and both thirds if not more to move up to the 11th overall spot.
Right now my gut feeling is we stay and take either Bryant, McClain or Williams.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronx_2003 View PostThere's some talk of trading down with Phily and getting another 2nd or 3rd but Phily pick around # 24 I believe.
Is it really worth missing out on a stud receiver like Bryant or quality 3-4 DE like Odrick just for the sake of getting another pick, espeically if its just another 3rd round player.
You also have to be very careful. If we go down to 24 then these will be gone -
Dan Williams
Bryant
Odrick
Pouncey
The main players we are targeting.
Even picking up a 2nd is OK but we still miss out on the elite talent. Huge drop off after Bryant, Odrick and Pouncey IMO
We have a decent number of picks, maybe we should just get a stud at 11
:go:
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: