Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bills Steal Joique Bell

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Joshecalpoly View Post
    LOL yeah the Bills love being of the defensive lately lol jk. I think Bell has better potential then Spiller. Hes got great size and he makes people miss better then any healthy back in the game. He isnt good in open field but he is a guy who is hard to take down.

    I dont care if he is a small school back rushing 3 1000+ yard years in a row including the 2000+ yard year he had this year is hard and he given the chance he is going to be dangerous.
    How can you honestly say Bell has more potential than Spiller? Ask every personnel man around the league and I guarantee you will not find one who believes Bell is better now or has more potential. Players with more potential than a top 10 pick don't go undrafted.
    Go Broncos!!!:thumb:

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Iron Clady View Post
      How can you honestly say Bell has more potential than Spiller? Ask every personnel man around the league and I guarantee you will not find one who believes Bell is better now or has more potential. Players with more potential than a top 10 pick don't go undrafted.
      Cut-Backs have a better percentage then speed-packs. He is incredibly good he just is a small school prospect.
      2016 Draft: http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...aft-Watch-list

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Joshecalpoly View Post
        Cut-Backs have a better percentage then speed-packs. He is incredibly good he just is a small school prospect.
        So you're saying Spiller can't cut?
        Go Broncos!!!:thumb:

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Iron Clady View Post
          So you're saying Spiller can't cut?
          I think he's more saying that Spiller's big draw is his speed, and that speed doesn't mean much at RB in the NFL. I tend to agree with him on that. Not sure about Bell, but Spiller seems like a change-of-pace speed back to me--not a guy who looks like he can carry the load for a team.
          Only fools bet against Tim Tebow.

          Team Tebow #108

          Yards, without points, mean nothing.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by DancingHorsey View Post
            I think he's more saying that Spiller's big draw is his speed, and that speed doesn't mean much at RB in the NFL. I tend to agree with him on that. Not sure about Bell, but Spiller seems like a change-of-pace speed back to me--not a guy who looks like he can carry the load for a team.
            Thanks thats exactly what I was thinking

            In 4 seasons he had 1,181 touches averaging 5.7 yards a touch for 6,728 yards 88 TD's and 79 receptions for 918 yards and 8 TD's

            Last year he had 348 touches which makes me think he can carry the load I think he is less of a situational back then Spiller. Spiller had 129 touches he is not going to anything more then a role player like Bush.
            2016 Draft: http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...aft-Watch-list

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Joshecalpoly View Post
              Cut-Backs have a better percentage then speed-packs. He is incredibly good he just is a small school prospect.
              Sorry but that's just awful logic.
              Go Broncos!!!:thumb:

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Iron Clady View Post
                Sorry but that's just awful logic.
                lol re-quoting me. What I am saying as a situational back Spiller is less likely to succeed as cut-back who has more potential to be used on every down Bell he can be an asset.
                2016 Draft: http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...aft-Watch-list

                Comment

                Working...
                X