Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2011 Draft Needs and Mock

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • broncomaniac333
    replied
    Originally posted by SmokeBassett
    Would the Bears be willing to let him go in a trade, and what would they expect in return?

    I'd be willing to give away a 2nd-round pick to get him.
    negative:nono::nono::nono::nono:

    Leave a comment:


  • Den615
    replied
    Originally posted by Hoserman117
    A 2nd round pick for a CB who's going to be 30 at the start of the 2011 season?

    No thanks....
    Seriously, I'd rather just take my chances and draft a CB with that 2nd round pick.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rockies3384
    replied
    I don't think they'd give Tillman up. If we offered a 2nd though (which is too high), I'm sure they would have to consider it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rockies3384
    replied
    He's a LB playing safety! I too wish we would have drafted him.

    Leave a comment:


  • housemouse
    replied
    I really wanted to draft Zibby. But it didn't happen.
    In fact, he's currently my favorite NFL player.

    And it's highly unlikely that they'll give him up for just a 3rd.

    Leave a comment:


  • Af Blue
    replied
    I don't know about more Notre Dame players now.....Floyd would be the only one I'd want on our team now, the rest look terrible at the time being. I would have LOVED to see us get Golden Tate last year, strongest hands on a reciever in a long while.

    Leave a comment:


  • SoundsOfSuccess
    replied
    The only positions I care about are RB (for style of running), WR (Physical or speedy), and CB (nickelback or full timer).

    Leave a comment:


  • IDONTPLAYGAMES
    replied
    Originally posted by Doheenz
    So judging by what your saying, Tom Brandstater should have been a top pick when he came out, he was the perfect prototypical QB size!

    Jake Locker would have been a top pick last year because he put up great numbers, you see his draft stock falling now because he seems to have regressed this year.
    ------------------------

    In 07 our pass rush was awful, we sought out a very talented player in Jarvis Moss to fix our defensive problems, he just needed to add a little bulk to his frame, but for some reason he never could.... how did that turn out?

    Give me size and strength (especially on D) and a good motor... Ala Nick Fairley or Marcell Darius
    I dont think that what he meant at all. i think he meant that we should draft people with actual talent and not draft people that look like they should play the position with limited talent. People drop in drafts all the time because people question their size and nothing else and a lot of the time the "experts" end up being beyond wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doheenz
    replied
    Originally posted by the0rangecrush
    I feel to many people are caught up in the size factor with players. Just because a player physically meets up to standards doesn't mean talent wise they do. If Jake Locker had come out last year he would have been the number 1 overall pick, why because physically he is the ideal QB. It happens all the time. Now im not saying size isnt important, but its to much of a deermining factor. Talent is more important than size.
    So judging by what your saying, Tom Brandstater should have been a top pick when he came out, he was the perfect prototypical QB size!

    Jake Locker would have been a top pick last year because he put up great numbers, you see his draft stock falling now because he seems to have regressed this year.
    ------------------------

    In 07 our pass rush was awful, we sought out a very talented player in Jarvis Moss to fix our defensive problems, he just needed to add a little bulk to his frame, but for some reason he never could.... how did that turn out?

    Give me size and strength (especially on D) and a good motor... Ala Nick Fairley or Marcell Darius

    Leave a comment:


  • beastlyskronk
    replied
    Originally posted by elway 1987
    So you would want a D-Line just like Baltimore's?
    Pretty much, I think it allows us to get the most out of our LBs

    Leave a comment:


  • elway 1987
    replied
    Originally posted by beastlyskronk
    I agree with you but I value strength most for just about every position. Usually bigger guys are stronger which is why I tend to like players that are bigger than normal. I've already stated that my ideal 3-4 D-Line would have 2 320 DEs and at least a 350 NT. I just want the team to physically dominate people.
    So you would want a D-Line just like Baltimore's?

    Leave a comment:


  • beastlyskronk
    replied
    I agree with you but I value strength most for just about every position. Usually bigger guys are stronger which is why I tend to like players that are bigger than normal. I've already stated that my ideal 3-4 D-Line would have 2 320 DEs and at least a 350 NT. I just want the team to physically dominate people.

    Leave a comment:


  • the0rangecrush
    replied
    Talent over size

    I feel to many people are caught up in the size factor with players. Just because a player physically meets up to standards doesn't mean talent wise they do. If Jake Locker had come out last year he would have been the number 1 overall pick, why because physically he is the ideal QB. It happens all the time. Now im not saying size isnt important, but its to much of a deermining factor. Talent is more important than size.

    Leave a comment:


  • JaysusCutler
    replied
    Thanks y'all. Sounds like just what we need.

    Leave a comment:


  • IDONTPLAYGAMES
    replied
    Dude is a beast i would love if i could see some more Notre Dame players on Denver.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎