Effort + Hard work = 2nd Overall

[99 Watt Bulb]

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=6144164&categoryid=2564308

[johnlimburg]

I would rather him over bowers

[evski19]

Trade back if that's ur pick its a huge reach at 2

[johnlimburg]

Trade back if that's ur pick its a huge reach at 2

no it isnt.

[evski19]

Jj watt at 2 when u can get him at 7 is a reach

[Kyousukeneko]

i see jj watt as the perfect five tech, i would take kerrigan at DE in our system, he is not really undersize shifty and a fast a great player.

[evski19]

if you do either one of those drop out of the top 5 maybe even 10

[Caliraiderhater]

I like Watt but would have to punch myself in the face if the Broncos drafted him 2nd overall. WAYYYY to big of a reach! Watt is a great player but if he can be had between picks 5-10 and possibly even later in the draft no way you pull the trigger. When selecting that high in the draft you have to pick a player that wouldn't fall more than a pick or two beyond your pick.

IMO there are only 3 players worthy of #2 in this draft and 2 players that would are a slight reach but good enough to pay #2 money too.

Worthy - Fairley, Peterson & Bowers (I'm not even that high on bowers but if every expert says he should be there I will put him there as well)

Reach - Dareus & Miller

If somehow Fairley falls to 2 he should be the selection. If he is picked 1st it would be a waste to pick anybody else aside from the guys I have mentioned above unless we trade down.

[Ringo56]

I would love if we took Watt and I think people will see that he isn't a huge reach after they see what type of player and person he is. Watt is the total package and I would jump for joy if we end up getting him on draft day.

[Kno-Sean]

JJ Watt will be drafted in the top 10 IMO

I wouldn't mind seeing the Broncos trade back only a few spots and snag another draft pick while still getting JJ.

[Al Wilson 4 Mayor]

JJ Watt will be drafted in the top 10 IMO

I wouldn't mind seeing the Broncos trade back only a few spots and snag another draft pick while still getting JJ.

That won't surprise me at all. It sounds like they want to use Elvis situationally, which would probably be better for his production. His production has historically tailed off in the second half of each season he's been healthy. Considering his size I think he's better off not playing 50 snaps a game.

[Kno-Sean]

That won't surprise me at all. It sounds like they want to use Elvis situationally, which would probably be better for his production. His production has historically tailed off in the second half of each season he's been healthy. Considering his size I think he's better off not playing 50 snaps a game.

What round pick do you think we get if we swapped first round picks with someone and we stayed in the top 10?

[Al Wilson 4 Mayor]

What round pick do you think we get if we swapped first round picks with someone and we stayed in the top 10?

I'm not a guru, but I think if we even move back one spot we should get atleast the equivalent of a 2nd round pick. If we move back to the 6-10 range we would hypothetically get a 2nd plus a next year 1st, or a 2nd, 3rd and a 4th......I think.

[Kno-Sean]

I'm not a guru, but I think if we even move back one spot we should get atleast the equivalent of a 2nd round pick. If we move back to the 6-10 range we would hypothetically get a 2nd plus a next year 1st, or a 2nd, 3rd and a 4th......I think.

So with 3 second round picks.

JJ Watt, Martez Wilson, Marvin Austin, Quinton Carter, Luke Stocker.

I like the sound of that.

[Al Wilson 4 Mayor]

So with 3 second round picks.

JJ Watt, Martez Wilson, Marvin Austin, Quinton Carter, Luke Stocker.

I like the sound of that.

Kyle Orton being traded might bring another 2nd as well. I really like where our first 2nd is. It would be nice if we could use a mid 2nd to trade back into the first.

I do think there will be a couple of good DT's available between picks 25-45.