Originally posted by bigtimebronco
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Broncos Schedule Private Vist With Cam Newton April 18th in Denver
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lukic View PostGabbert and Newton are highly regarded QBs in an extremely weak draft class dude.
Gabbert is inaccurate and struggles greatly produced in arguably the easiest offense in football.
Chase Daniels was lethal in the offense and look where he is. Gabbert has nothing on Daniels as a passer, yet because of his measurable is a first round prospect in the media.
Newton much like Tebow made his crust of being a dual threat, Newton the better runner and Tebow the better passer. Tebow however comes without character concerns and had done it over 3/4 years, Newton, only 1 and he's coming out. Most teams if they had the choice of the two would take Tebow imo. Tebow presents a very similar package with excellent intagibles and leadership.
Also, I don't understand how you have Clausen going before Tebow. If 2 teams had a first round projection for Tebow, it means none had a first round projection for Clausen. There was 24 picks between where they went, surely Clausen would've gone earlier then.
I don't think Jimmy Clausen is better then Tebow, or any of the guys I listed after him. However I put that list together as if the 2010 draft hadn't happened, and last year Clausen was the #2 consensus QB.
Newton is 50x the passer Tebow is, and if it wasn't for his character issues. He'd be the clear #1 QB this year. Newton has Tebow beat on EVERYTHING related to passing. Mechanics, motion, release, arm strength, accuracy.... Everything. That's not even debateable man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Project KSL View PostThat is 100% false. Before we took him.... Everyone last year hated the idea of taking Tebow. Don't believe me? Go look up
my
mock last year that I posted in January. Where I HAD THE BRONCOS TAKING TEBOW. Go look at those comments. Yeh you did call that but it was it november. CP.
If they merged the classes bias aside. This is how it would go
Bradford
Gabbert
Newton
Clausen
Locker
I beleive the class would go if it was based purely on talnet alone. Mallet would be there if he wasnt a drug using partying bum. Appaarently.:
Bradford
Gabbert
Newton
Mallet
Then you can have your pick of 6th among Ponder, Kaps, Mallett, Tebow and whoever else.
NO ONE HAD A FIRST ROUND GRADE ON TEBOW
Just because he's now on the Broncos' roster doesn't mean he's better now.
I beleive a few people actually did have a first round grade down. Not a high first but a 20-65 guy. Apparently if the broncos didnt trade up for him there were a few other teams that would of according to mark schlereth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Project KSL View PostGabbert also had a big arm, better accuracy then anyone not named Bradford from last year's class, and the measureable you want. I'm not a Gabbert fan, but he is a very good PROSPECT.
I don't think Jimmy Clausen is better then Tebow, or any of the guys I listed after him. However I put that list together as if the 2010 draft hadn't happened, and last year Clausen was the #2 consensus QB.
Newton is 50x the passer Tebow is, and if it wasn't for his character issues. He'd be the clear #1 QB this year. Newton has Tebow beat on EVERYTHING related to passing. Mechanics, motion, release, arm strength, accuracy.... Everything. That's not even debateable man.sigpic
God Bless. Go Broncos.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnlimburg View PostI beleive a few people actually did have a first round grade down. Not a high first but a 20-65 guy. Apparently if the broncos didnt trade up for him there were a few other teams that would of according to mark schlereth.
move up an take him. Which I do believe. However taking a player in the 1st, and that player having a "1st round grade"
is entirely different. We were pressured to trade up to secure him. Anyone who covers the draft had him AT BEST a 2nd round prospect. This year any number of 2nd round QB's will go in the first. But they won't have a "first round grade" they'll just be chosen in the first,
Like I said, I'm not a Gabbert fan. He struggled a lot, in a lot of games. But he has what you can't coach, the size and the arm strength.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Project KSL View PostPeople also raved about the arms of Vick, Favre, Big Ben, McNabb, Cutler...... That could go both ways.sigpic
God Bless. Go Broncos.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigtimebronco View PostI agree, but someone who may appear 50x the passer of someone else prior to the draft doesnt mean they will be 50x the quarterback. Look at Tom Brady's scouting reports, they were downright awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Project KSL View PostTom Brady is THE MAJOR EXCEPTION. Which is why his story is so amazing. That stuff nearly NEVER happens. Scouts are right mote often then not, which are why they have the jobs they have.
Besides the size concerns he sounds a little like Tebow huh? That was said about Drew Breessigpic
God Bless. Go Broncos.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Project KSL View PostTom Brady is THE MAJOR EXCEPTION. Which is why his story is so amazing. That stuff nearly NEVER happens. Scouts are right mote often then not, which are why they have the jobs they have.
They get it wrong on a lot of highly rated ones, and some good ones totally get underrated.
Malcolm Gladwell wrote an excellent article analyzing this phenomenon.
Comment
-
There's negatives about EVERY prospect. Next year Andrew Luck will still have negatives.... Every prospect does. Tebow had a lot
more then most.
Throwing motion
release
accuracy
footwork
arm strength
spread offense
no under center experience
the only positives to Tebow as a prospect were his intanglibles.
Look at Gabbert's pro con list
ideal size
above average arm strength
quick release
good mechanics
great accuracy
high football iq
more mobile then you think
natural leader
for cons
below average numbers
bad footwork
tends to force throws
pocket awareness needs work
spread offense
no under center experience
You could also probably throw a few more on either side. But you can see why Gabbert is the #1 QB ofthe class... And some wanted Tebow to play TE
Comment
-
Originally posted by Project KSL View PostTebow had a lot
more then most.
Throwing motion
release
accuracy
footwork
arm strength
spread offense
no under center experience
the only positives to Tebow as a prospect were his intanglibles.
Throwing motion and release are basically one thing.
Footwork and no under center experience are basically the same thing. And Sam Bradford had very little experience under center and ran the spread.
On the positives, Tebow as a prospect had more than intangibles. He smoked the combine, has great size and strength, good downfield accuracy, and demonstrated incredible statistical efficiency against great competition.
It's a myth that only McD like Tebow. He was the second quarterback taken, and would have been if you ran that draft 10 times. He went right where Aaron Rodgers and Brady Quinn went -- second best, in the 20's, but some questions about him so no one traded up higher.
I guarantee the following teams would have taken Tebow with their next pick -- Minnesota, Buffalo, Panthers, and probably Cleveland. Maybe Seattle. McD traded to right where he needed to be to get ahead of a wave of teams looking at Tebow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigtimebronco View PostI agree, but someone who may appear 50x the passer of someone else prior to the draft doesnt mean they will be 50x the quarterback. Look at Tom Brady's scouting reports, they were downright awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jay3 View PostThat's not really accurate. First of all, most people are running from the "arm strength" knock and claiming they never said it. It was never a valid negative, and the real pros said he had an NFL arm. So already, you've incorporated some of the Kiper echo chamber stuff.
Throwing motion and release are basically one thing.
Footwork and no under center experience are basically the same thing. And Sam Bradford had very little experience under center and ran the spread.
On the positives, Tebow as a prospect had more than intangibles. He smoked the combine, has great size and strength, good downfield accuracy, and demonstrated incredible statistical efficiency against great competition.
It's a myth that only McD like Tebow. He was the second quarterback taken, and would have been if you ran that draft 10 times. He went right where Aaron Rodgers and Brady Quinn went -- second best, in the 20's, but some questions about him so no one traded up higher.
I guarantee the following teams would have taken Tebow with their next pick -- Minnesota, Buffalo, Panthers, and probably Cleveland. Maybe Seattle. McD traded to right where he needed to be to get ahead of a wave of teams looking at Tebow.
Tebow was very athletic, I will never take that away from him. But his Pro/Con list is very bottom heavy.
You can't guarantee anything related to Tebow. You can only assume. What we do known is nearly every team
you listed passed on him, and no one had a 1st round grade on him.
He wasn't even on some team's
boards. He wasn't a high regarded prospect, he wasn't supposed to go in the first, and had it not been or his "intangibles" he probably wouldn't
of even been drafted to be a QB. Like I said, if you want to see unbiased opinions on Tebow in Denver before it happened go back and look at my mock last year. I said Tebkw would be Josh's pick, and was RIPPED for it. We all want to believe people on our team are better then they are. But we have to be realistic,
Comment
Comment