Biggest Needs (In order)

[broncos SB2010]

I voted other.

1. DT
2. OLB
3. MLB
4. OT
5. DE
6. S

[BroncoSexyDaddy]

I chose the other option. I would like 2 DTs, 2DEs, 3OLs,LB, and a TE.

I hope it could be possible with some trades if the CBA goes through.

[omahaBroncoFan]

DT,S,.... is the best one up there I'd say despite disagreeing with the rest of the list, but 'other' is too ambigious so DT,S,...rest of our many needs...

[Project KSL]

Dt
lb
s
qb
de
te
rb

[johnlimburg]

Defensive Tackle

Safety

Linebacker

Offensive Tackle

Defensive End

Tightend

Running Back

Offensive Guard

[Iron Clady]

1=dt
2=rt
3=ss
4=mlb
5=slb
6=rb
7=te
8=dt

[diesel51]

I voted other. My order is based off getting players that will upgrade our defense the most next season, with the understanding that it's not going to be fixed in one draft.

We need new startes at DT, SS/FS, SLB/MLB and possibly OT. We need depth at RB, TE, and CB and possibly another QB and OG.

So my needs in order are:

DT
DT
SS or FS
OT
SLB or MLB
RB

[darklord]

DT,DT,MLB,S,OLB,OT(if we loose Harris),TE,RB

[Ohenhen12345]

Broncos needs

1. DT
2. LB
3. S
4. OG
5. TE
6. RB
7. FB

in that order

[johnlimburg]

Broncos needs

1. DT
2. LB
3. S
4. OG
5. TE
6. RB
7. FB

in that order

Question: Why OG and where is OT

[Amari24]

1.dt
2.s
3.te
4.mlb
5.cb
6.rb
7.olb

[SoundsOfSuccess]

No matter what order of needs you have, you don't draft players at those positions in that order.

Your first rounder should always be BPA that will start immedietely, except if you're a team where you can afford luxury picks.

Your second and third rounders should be picks that strictly fill your needs, but again, not in specific order other than BPA at your positions of need.

Your 4-7 picks should be 100% by need and for depth, because you don't expect 4-7th round picks to step in and be game changers immedietely like early rounders.

I don't buy the "the four biggest needs of the team are __, __, __, and ___", so therefore we're drafting "__, __, __, and ___", because they play those positions.

[johnlimburg]

No matter what order of needs you have, you don't draft players at those positions in that order.

Your first rounder should always be BPA that will start immedietely, except if you're a team where you can afford luxury picks.

Your second and third rounders should be picks that strictly fill your needs, but again, not in specific order other than BPA at your positions of need.

Your 4-7 picks should be 100% by need and for depth, because you don't expect 4-7th round picks to step in and be game changers immedietely like early rounders.

I don't buy the "the four biggest needs of the team are __, __, __, and ___", so therefore we're drafting "__, __, __, and ___", because they play those positions.

Incorrect. This isnt true. The situation changes who ever is on the board and that determines what happens. There is no set formula teams go by. They make their decision on the spot depending on who falls.

Plus the 6 and 7 rounders are mostly going to be players that may fall into our laps that are BPA.

What you said is not true

[SoundsOfSuccess]

Incorrect. This isnt true. The situation changes who ever is on the board and that determines what happens. There is no set formula teams go by. They make their decision on the spot depending on who falls.

Plus the 6 and 7 rounders are mostly going to be players that may fall into our laps that are BPA.

What you said is not true

[

It can't be true, its my opinion...

[BeardedWonder]

MLb > dt > s > fb = OG/OT= te