Biggest Needs (In order)

[dieselpower]

i think our biggest need is for the front office to do a better job.

but ya.....ill role with elway 7 days a week and twice on sundays.

[johnlimburg]

Sorry couldnt help myself.

Back to the thread now.



Dammit it didnt work. It was about 40 people doing a facepalm. Lol.

What does everyone think about our OG position. I dont see it as a need as we currently have an unknow guy named manny ramirez on the roster. He is a guy i loved a few years ago coming out of college. I think him and olsen are preety solid backup guards and centres. I think on the oline the biggest problem is OT. Another thing i thought of to help the OT depth is tony washington anyone remember him. We should bring him in for a workout. What he done was gross but forgivable.

[SoundsOfSuccess]

Ok i get it. You were wrong and turning the tthread off topic . JUst leave it at a triple and back to the needs.

lol, I'm done now.

[johnlimburg]

Ok i get it. You were wrong and turning the tthread off topic . JUst leave it at a triple and back to the needs.

[SoundsOfSuccess]

Hahaha. Well how about you throw in a "IMO" every once in a while itstead of making it sound like it is fact, this is the way it works. Thats it. And really. A facepalm for that. Thats deserves a double facepalm back to you sir.

Anyway back on topic I beleive OT is one of our largest needs that doesnt get recognized all that much. I think we should use a 2nd/3rd on an OT. Even if harris is good to go and is resigned we must have a plan B. Right now we have some chris clark or something and I dont want an injury to either of the starters and then to have to have guys like batiste and clark in there possibly starting.

[johnlimburg]

Hahaha. Well how about you throw in a "IMO" every once in a while itstead of making it sound like it is fact, this is the way it works. Thats it. And really. A facepalm for that. Thats deserves a double facepalm back to you sir.

Anyway back on topic I beleive OT is one of our largest needs that doesnt get recognized all that much. I think we should use a 2nd/3rd on an OT. Even if harris is good to go and is resigned we must have a plan B. Right now we have some chris clark or something and I dont want an injury to either of the starters and then to have to have guys like batiste and clark in there possibly starting.

[BeardedWonder]

MLb > dt > s > fb = OG/OT= te

[SoundsOfSuccess]

Incorrect. This isnt true. The situation changes who ever is on the board and that determines what happens. There is no set formula teams go by. They make their decision on the spot depending on who falls.

Plus the 6 and 7 rounders are mostly going to be players that may fall into our laps that are BPA.

What you said is not true

[

It can't be true, its my opinion...

[johnlimburg]

No matter what order of needs you have, you don't draft players at those positions in that order.

Your first rounder should always be BPA that will start immedietely, except if you're a team where you can afford luxury picks.

Your second and third rounders should be picks that strictly fill your needs, but again, not in specific order other than BPA at your positions of need.

Your 4-7 picks should be 100% by need and for depth, because you don't expect 4-7th round picks to step in and be game changers immedietely like early rounders.

I don't buy the "the four biggest needs of the team are __, __, __, and ___", so therefore we're drafting "__, __, __, and ___", because they play those positions.

Incorrect. This isnt true. The situation changes who ever is on the board and that determines what happens. There is no set formula teams go by. They make their decision on the spot depending on who falls.

Plus the 6 and 7 rounders are mostly going to be players that may fall into our laps that are BPA.

What you said is not true

[SoundsOfSuccess]

No matter what order of needs you have, you don't draft players at those positions in that order.

Your first rounder should always be BPA that will start immedietely, except if you're a team where you can afford luxury picks.

Your second and third rounders should be picks that strictly fill your needs, but again, not in specific order other than BPA at your positions of need.

Your 4-7 picks should be 100% by need and for depth, because you don't expect 4-7th round picks to step in and be game changers immedietely like early rounders.

I don't buy the "the four biggest needs of the team are __, __, __, and ___", so therefore we're drafting "__, __, __, and ___", because they play those positions.

[Amari24]

1.dt
2.s
3.te
4.mlb
5.cb
6.rb
7.olb

[johnlimburg]

Broncos needs

1. DT
2. LB
3. S
4. OG
5. TE
6. RB
7. FB

in that order

Question: Why OG and where is OT

[Ohenhen12345]

Broncos needs

1. DT
2. LB
3. S
4. OG
5. TE
6. RB
7. FB

in that order

[darklord]

DT,DT,MLB,S,OLB,OT(if we loose Harris),TE,RB

[diesel51]

I voted other. My order is based off getting players that will upgrade our defense the most next season, with the understanding that it's not going to be fixed in one draft.

We need new startes at DT, SS/FS, SLB/MLB and possibly OT. We need depth at RB, TE, and CB and possibly another QB and OG.

So my needs in order are:

DT
DT
SS or FS
OT
SLB or MLB
RB