Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sports kings Mock Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by DenverBlood
    Yeah I know. I watched a 9 minute video from his junior year. He doesn't impress me much. Sure he made some nice throws but the video showed his negatives too and he had a ton of throws that made you go what??? Kind of like Tebow. Missing wide open guys by 10 yards, way over throwing, throwing in the dirt to a wide open guy. However unlike Tebow he was forcing a lot more passes into double and triple coverage for int's.

    I do like the idea of a QB third round but if available I think I would prefer Wheedon, Tannehill, Keenum. Though Keenum likely goes second round.
    I believe I've seen the same video. When I look at Lindley I see a bunch of potential. The way he throws his deep balls reminds me a lot of Drew Brees. He has a pretty good arm. He does force passes and makes mistakes. He is sort of a streaky passer. I also like his vision, he seems to always be looking around and makes quick decisions.

    About the other QBs you mentioned, they are all realistic possibility's. I think Tannehill will go 1st rd and the others will be right in our 3rd rd range. I'm also high on Nick Foles but i believe he will be drafted late first or early second.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by westcoastbronco15
      I believe I've seen the same video. When I look at Lindley I see a bunch of potential. The way he throws his deep balls reminds me a lot of Drew Brees. He has a pretty good arm. He does force passes and makes mistakes. He is sort of a streaky passer. I also like his vision, he seems to always be looking around and makes quick decisions.

      About the other QBs you mentioned, they are all realistic possibility's. I think Tannehill will go 1st rd and the others will be right in our 3rd rd range. I'm also high on Nick Foles but i believe he will be drafted late first or early second.
      Tannehill will most likely be second round as well. The teams drafting in the late first don't need a QB much less using their first round pick on one. Also I thought about mentioning Nick Foles but I haven't seen enough tape on him to compare to these other guys.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by DenverBlood
        Tannehill will most likely be second round as well. The teams drafting in the late first don't need a QB much less using their first round pick on one. Also I thought about mentioning Nick Foles but I haven't seen enough tape on him to compare to these other guys.
        Yeah but you have to think that at least one team is going to trade for a late first rd so they can select a QB. I haven't really looked too much into Foles either but from what i have seen he looks pretty good. I'm going to be paying a lot of attention to Brock Osweiler and Nick Foles.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by westcoastbronco15
          Yeah but you have to think that at least one team is going to trade for a late first rd so they can select a QB. I haven't really looked too much into Foles either but from what i have seen he looks pretty good. I'm going to be paying a lot of attention to Brock Osweiler and Nick Foles.
          I realize it has happened in the past such as the Browns trading back up to get Brady Quinn but that's a huge mistake. Look how that turned out for them. I just don't understand the logic of someone wanting to give up a future first round pick and their current early 2nd round pick to get back into the first round to take a QB. Much less Tannehill. When you can most likely wait and either nab him with your second round pick or trade up early second round to get him from a team in the second round who already drafted a QB. You give up a lot less in that sort of trade or possibly don't give up anything at all.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by DenverBlood
            I realize it has happened in the past such as the Browns trading back up to get Brady Quinn but that's a huge mistake. Look how that turned out for them. I just don't understand the logic of someone wanting to give up a future first round pick and their current early 2nd round pick to get back into the first round to take a QB. Much less Tannehill. When you can most likely wait and either nab him with your second round pick or trade up early second round to get him from a team in the second round who already drafted a QB. You give up a lot less in that sort of trade or possibly don't give up anything at all.
            I completely agree with you, but you never know whats gonna happen. I could see a Team like the Redskins trading back into the first round to take Tannehill if they don't get a QB in the first. But yeah its risky bussiness

            Comment


            • #96
              Let's Help Tebow draft

              My last mock draft had Denver going for a DT first but I realize that they like to get experienced DT's from free agency so this time I want to help Tebow and the offense, so here goes:
              #1 Cordy Glenn OG 6'5" 348 Good backup OL to start with but will be a starter soon.
              #2 Chris Polk RB 5'11 220 Big enough to take a pounding, pretty fast also.
              #3 Trumaine Johnson CB 6'1" 204 Big corner, fast, with a little mean streak in him.
              #4 Jake Bequette DE 6'5" 271 One of the faster DE in the draft, he has ran a 4.54 40 and should add a little support to Ayres and Doom!
              5A Jerry Franklin ILB 6'1'242 Fox's size LB , fast (4.52 40) and 2nd on his college team in sacks!
              5B Akiem Hicks DT 6'5" 324 Perhaps a little bit of a reach but has the potiential to make it worth the risk!
              #7 Ron Brooks CB/S 5'11" 178 Played safety at LSU, has the speed (4.36) to develope into a CB at this level.

              Glenn and Polk should help Tebow plus help the running game. The rest should help our defense in the immediate future!

              Brooks and Hicks are projects but loads of potiential!

              Comment


              • #97
                Ew we don't need a guard high, we would be better to use it on a DT like cox, worthy or brockers. we have 2 starting guards drafting a guard in the first round would mean starter day one, which is what you want to go for in the first, and glenn may never start here.
                sigpic
                oakland raders gm
                latavis murray trade bait

                Comment


                • #98
                  Love it, i think ou could get lindley in the fourth, turbin in the 5th and then move a guy like joe adams in to the number 3 spot.

                  i'd predict that tannehill and foles or os or both will be first rounders.
                  sigpic
                  oakland raders gm
                  latavis murray trade bait

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Kyousukeneko
                    Ew we don't need a guard high, we would be better to use it on a DT like cox, worthy or brockers. we have 2 starting guards drafting a guard in the first round would mean starter day one, which is what you want to go for in the first, and glenn may never start here.
                    I agree, I had lots rather have Blockers than Glenn but Denver showed us last year that they won't use a high round draft choice on a DT! There was some really good ones left when they drafted in the 2nd round and the drafted a safety and right tackle!

                    Comment


                    • worthy? no no, Id perfer to get Devon Still, theyre more agressive, and even Jared Crick in the 5th or 6th would be better than worthy IMO

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Kansas Bob
                        I agree, I had lots rather have Blockers than Glenn but Denver showed us last year that they won't use a high round draft choice on a DT! There was some really good ones left when they drafted in the 2nd round and the drafted a safety and right tackle!
                        well then our Defense will never reach where it needs to reach. we are missing that penetraition from the middle and we really need it. make it. even if they don't got DT high i can see them passing on jenkins or minnifield for a back up OG. some one who could replace goody right away is more important then some one who may never start for the broncos.

                        plus looking back at least year, we obviously made a mistake drafting moore over paea or Austin.
                        sigpic
                        oakland raders gm
                        latavis murray trade bait

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Kyousukeneko
                          Love it, i think ou could get lindley in the fourth, turbin in the 5th and then move a guy like joe adams in to the number 3 spot.

                          i'd predict that tannehill and foles or os or both will be first rounders.
                          Yeah that would be awesome if we could get those players later in the draft. And yeah, many teams are going to be looking for QBs so it wouldn't be surprising to see them go in the first.

                          Comment


                          • With so many people having Fletcher Cox as our pick this year, there is no doubt in my mind we will not get Fletcher Cox.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by xX-Bronco-Xx
                              With so many people having Fletcher Cox as our pick this year, there is no doubt in my mind we will not get Fletcher Cox.
                              I like that more than the TE or other mocks that have Dennard CB from Nebraska.
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by xX-Bronco-Xx
                                With so many people having Fletcher Cox as our pick this year, there is no doubt in my mind we will not get Fletcher Cox.
                                Yeah he seems like the best possible option for us. Even if we don't get him first rd there is no doubt in my mind we will take a DT in the first 3 rounds. The NFL.com mocks all have us taking Jerel Worthy but I'm not sold on him especially coming off on injury.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎