I realize it's only been one year, and I'm really pulling for Ronnie Hillman, and especially Montee Ball, but I really question our FO's ability to draft effective RB's.
I was not a fan of the Hillman pick when it was made. Instead, there were three other running backs who I thought highly of that we passed up.....Lamar Miller, Bernard Pierce, and Robert Turbin. In my opinion, all three had the size and speed to be more of a featured back, as opposed to the scat-back role I see Hillman fitting. Their rookie statistics tend to bore that out.
Miller had 51 rushes for 250 yards. That's a 4.9 YPC. Turbin had 354 yards on 80 carries for a 4.4 YPC. Pierce had 108 carries for 532 yards, which comes to a 4.9 YPC. Hillman had 85 carries for 330 yards for only 3.9 YPC. All three are bigger than Hillman, and two of them are faster as well. What did we see that was so special in Hillman?
I hope our evaluation of Montee Ball is not in the same vain.
I was not a fan of the Hillman pick when it was made. Instead, there were three other running backs who I thought highly of that we passed up.....Lamar Miller, Bernard Pierce, and Robert Turbin. In my opinion, all three had the size and speed to be more of a featured back, as opposed to the scat-back role I see Hillman fitting. Their rookie statistics tend to bore that out.
Miller had 51 rushes for 250 yards. That's a 4.9 YPC. Turbin had 354 yards on 80 carries for a 4.4 YPC. Pierce had 108 carries for 532 yards, which comes to a 4.9 YPC. Hillman had 85 carries for 330 yards for only 3.9 YPC. All three are bigger than Hillman, and two of them are faster as well. What did we see that was so special in Hillman?
I hope our evaluation of Montee Ball is not in the same vain.
Comment