Originally posted by HUMCALC
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reasons to draft Quenton Nelson
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by ERoyal248 View PostThe only team i can see in the top 10 take him is maybe Chicago and they seem to be wanting Nelson or a LB'er.
SF and Oak could take him but i think they take Roquan/Edmunds specifically or Oakland could draft McGlinchey to shore up their OL, hole at RT.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by the0rangecrush View PostDidnt say, but if we are to use what incarcerated Bob reported
They offered the giants
Both 1sts, 2nd, 3rd, and next years 2nd.
I've also heard rumors maybe Shady gets included but idk about that
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ERoyal248 View PostRegarding Bills, what are they offering?
You know both 1's are in the offer, are they giving up a 1 or 2 next year, plus a 2nd and/or 3rd next year.
Ward and Hernandez seem to be where Denver would go if both were on the board in that scenario.
They offered the giants
Both 1sts, 2nd, 3rd, and next years 2nd.
I've also heard rumors maybe Shady gets included but idk about that
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chillez View PostI wouldn’t be against trading back and getting both Ward and Hernandez. I’m not sure Ward would be there past first 10 picks.
SF and Oak could take him but i think they take Roquan/Edmunds specifically or Oakland could draft McGlinchey to shore up their OL, hole at RT.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by the0rangecrush View PostThis is what Allbright tweeted based on what hes hearing right now
If I had to guess today...
1. Browns - Darnold
2. Giants - Barkley
3. Jets - Mayfield
4. Browns - Chubb
5. Bills - Allen
6. Colts - Nelson
Also said our targets would be Denzel Ward and Will Hernandez with the 2 1sts.
You know both 1's are in the offer, are they giving up a 1 or 2 next year, plus a 2nd and/or 3rd next year.
Ward and Hernandez seem to be where Denver would go if both were on the board in that scenario.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Butler By'Note View PostMaybe I'm wrong here, but I don't think Payne ends up being a pass rusher at all. Over 3 seasons and 35 games at Alabama he accounted for a total of 3 sacks. I think he ends up being a very good player against the run, but a guy who comes off the field in obvious pass rushing situations.
Perhaps I'm wrong on which Payne we're talking about? Or there's some underlying aspect I'm missing?
Edit-also just read on his draft profile he had 27 pressures so I think the ability is there.Last edited by shawinkerpoppin; 04-18-2018, 03:58 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gbt31 View PostNope. I would prioritize a pass rushing 3 tech over a NT. Not like I don't appreciate a good NT(Peko played well last year and is getting old), but with Gostis possible seeing a suspension his way, Wolfe coming up on his contract soon and always being injured and Walker being severely mismanaged by our staff...we need a pass rushing DT more than people think. Vea is a great player, but once again...he is a NT. Pass Rusher >>>> Run Stuff all day.
Perhaps I'm wrong on which Payne we're talking about? Or there's some underlying aspect I'm missing?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gbt31 View PostNope. I would prioritize a pass rushing 3 tech over a NT. Not like I don't appreciate a good NT(Peko played well last year and is getting old), but with Gostis possible seeing a suspension his way, Wolfe coming up on his contract soon and always being injured and Walker being severely mismanaged by our staff...we need a pass rushing DT more than people think. Vea is a great player, but once again...he is a NT. Pass Rusher >>>> Run Stuff all day.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Murph2432 View PostYou wouldn’t want Vita Vea over Payne?
Leave a comment:
-
My dream scenario is to trade back with Buffalo, pick up Da'ron Payne then Hernandez and then trade up with our second and take Isaiah Oliver
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by samparnell View PostAt least three of the four top QBs, B. Chubb, Barkley and Nelson will get picked in the top ten along with Fitzpatrick, Ward and other possibilities. Indy at #6 probably won't draft Nelson. Tampa Bay at #7 could use Nelson, but they might go DL or DB instead. If Nelson is there when Chicago picks at #8, they might take him as BPA although they probably need a TE or WR more, but #8 might be too early for one. After that, he increasingly becomes the BPA who can't be ignored and must be picked. I think he's gone in the top ten for sure, but that's just me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chillez View PostI wouldn’t be against trading back and getting both Ward and Hernandez. I’m not sure Ward would be there past first 10 picks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by maaskesr View PostI would be happy if we could trade back a spot or two and get Nelson. I'm coming around to taking Nelson and one of the top 3 backs (Guice, Jones) with the 2nd pick, if one were still there. I would love to have a dominant running game again where play action passes actually worked.
Not sure if there is any chance we could move back to 7 though (and hope he drops that far).
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: