Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

reasons to trade back up in the first

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Kyousukeneko View Post
    i would prefer a nelson and ot even if we lose lets say a third round pick. it would be really good.
    Agreed - we don’t have a history of drafting well in the second or 3rd

    Comment


    • #17
      Say we did trade with the Bills out of 5. What could we realistically expect for compensation.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by NVthosebroncos View Post
        Say we did trade with the Bills out of 5. What could we realistically expect for compensation.
        I honestly think the Jets overpaid...and overpaid when they don't have a particular player in mind. I mean obviously they have a big board, and their top 3 players on that board were deemed to be worth that price(at least I hope so...well actually not because I don't like the Jets but that is another matter). But as most have gleaned...they are probably targeting a QB. With the Browns, Jets and possible Giants going to take QB....I don't see the Bills moving up until Draft Day and it probably won't be for NEARLY as much. I honestly don't think we will be getting a Kings Ransom of a deal, comparable to Jets Colts trade, if one of the QB's falls to us at 5 and they want our pick to select him.
        New England Patriots GM

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by NVthosebroncos View Post
          Say we did trade with the Bills out of 5. What could we realistically expect for compensation.
          y
          I would be happy with 12-22 a second and say 4th . Then select either Mcglynchey Or Bpa then at 22 select Hernandez . Then use draft capital to select boa at ILB DLine RB etc

          Comment

          Working...
          X